|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:31 AM |
| according to the scientists who look for new sea creatures |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IoIiderp
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8613 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
CIarisa
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 8079 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:33 AM |
| how would you know there are 6 species in the ocean undiscovered if you havent discovered them like umggggg |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IoIiderp
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8613 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:33 AM |
| Because there is no way of knowing what you don't know. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:35 AM |
| they make a list of all the known sea creatures and circle the ones that arent on the list |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
IoIiderp
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8613 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:36 AM |
| And how do they know what creatures exist if they don't know they exist? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:37 AM |
| they have a list of what creatures exist and they make a circle around the creatures that arent on the list |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:38 AM |
"they have a list of what creatures exist and they make a circle around the creatures that arent on the list"
How is that even logical |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:39 AM |
| it helps them find out which species they need to discover |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iwafflee
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2191 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:41 AM |
| we have taken mores rips to the moon than to the ocean trench. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:42 AM |
| how do they have a list of undiscovered creatures if their undiscovered |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:43 AM |
| they take the list of discovered creatures and compare it to the list of all creatures and the ones that arent on the discovered list go on the undiscovered list |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 09:54 AM |
| They have to be lying. The ocean is the least explored place on earth. We actually know more about space than we do about the ocean. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:01 AM |
| if we know more about space then the ocean: what lives in space |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:04 AM |
Here's what lives in space; matter, void, and spacial fabric.
Sometimes, you think you're going to unfold. http://web.roblox.com/bad-time-2-item?id=314956292 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
MadSanity
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41506 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:13 AM |
| How can you know the amount of what is undiscovered by comparing incompletes? That makes no sense. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:16 AM |
| comparing a complete list of all the species with an complete list of what theyve discovered would absolutely leave nothing but the undiscovered ones |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MadSanity
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41506 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:40 AM |
"comparing a complete list of all the species with an complete list of what theyve discovered would absolutely leave nothing but the undiscovered ones"
Except the "complete list" would include an imaginary, undefined amount of species. If we had the absolute total number of species, that would assume we discovered ALL of them, and there wouldn't be a need for this discussion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:42 AM |
| are you saying things cant exist if humans havent discovered them |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Resizes
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 3474 |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:49 AM |
| Were those religious scientists? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:49 AM |
| no theyre scientific scientists |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MadSanity
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41506 |
|
|
| 29 Oct 2015 10:54 AM |
No.
I'll make it simple. Solve this:
t - d = u
Where all variables are positive integers.
t = total
d = discovered
u = unduscovered |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|