generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
   
ROBLOX Forum » Roblox » Suggestions & Ideas
Home Search
 

Re: Petition to REMOVE 2.0/3.0 Packages[READ BEFORE POSTING]

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
xxepicnessxx12345 is not online. xxepicnessxx12345
Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Total Posts: 2159
17 Oct 2015 04:31 PM
Now I know what majority of you are thinking:"OMG ROBLOX WOULD NEVER DO THAT, YOU'RE STUPID, ETC", but hear me out on this.

Though many people tend to deny that OD'ing has nothing to do with appearance, they are simply attempting to be politically correct. It has EVERYTHING to do with appearance. Think about it. These children tend to 'date' others because of their virtual look. If everyone was just blocks, why would they have a reason to do that?

Besides OD'ing, ROBLOX is supposed to be a building game. It's a world that's separate from real life. Why should we be dressing like real human beings? I mean, literally more than 50% of individuals who wear 2.0/3.0 use it for OD'ing purposes.

I'm positive the only reason ROBLOX still has it up despite a massive majority of the community being OD'ers is simply because they make money off these squeakers.

3.0 is HIDEOUS as many can agree, and really make the community look ugly as a whole due to the vast majority of new players looking like that.

Furthermore, I seem to recall a certain instance where ROBLOX was sued for having lego-like studs on parts. And now, this 3.0 package. The hands are exactly the same as a lego toy character's. So are the arms and legs. So not only is this promoting online OD'ing, it's also unoriginal.

That's all I really have to say. Post your thoughts below and let me know what you think.


Too long didn't read - It promotes OD'ing heavily, is unoriginal and makes a virtual building game look like real life which is un-necessary.



raise ur hams
Report Abuse
CasperTheGhost7 is not online. CasperTheGhost7
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Total Posts: 10991
17 Oct 2015 04:34 PM
One word....

No.
Report Abuse
RobloxStar4536 is not online. RobloxStar4536
Joined: 16 Sep 2013
Total Posts: 313
17 Oct 2015 04:35 PM
WNTS


Congrats OP! You got a F- for making this suggestion.
Report Abuse
spectrumspark is not online. spectrumspark
Joined: 21 Feb 2014
Total Posts: 930
17 Oct 2015 04:45 PM
sorry to say but roblox is evolving whether you like it or not
Report Abuse
xxepicnessxx12345 is not online. xxepicnessxx12345
Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Total Posts: 2159
17 Oct 2015 04:48 PM
ROBLOX is evolving, but it shouldn't be evolving into an eyesore.

Making the 2.0 package was probably the biggest mistake right alongside the price floors.

It shouldn't be evolving into online dater paradise.

We don't need that crap.



raise ur hams
Report Abuse
AMkidd408 is not online. AMkidd408
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Total Posts: 1187
17 Oct 2015 04:48 PM
let em wear whatever they like
Report Abuse
xxepicnessxx12345 is not online. xxepicnessxx12345
Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Total Posts: 2159
17 Oct 2015 04:50 PM
Well, Rip the opportunity to reverse the effects of that horrible day in which this package was released.

I give up, I quit.

The hideous new players will overflow the site, and the already existing OD'ers will continue to rot it from the inside.

gg



raise ur hams
Report Abuse
FileDeIeted is not online. FileDeIeted
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Total Posts: 621
17 Oct 2015 05:08 PM
i would like very much but its wnts
Report Abuse
fireking100489 is not online. fireking100489
Joined: 10 Mar 2011
Total Posts: 5586
17 Oct 2015 05:10 PM
2012'er posted this
2.0 came out in 2009 or 2010

gr8 b8 m8
Report Abuse
CoolIzzy227 is not online. CoolIzzy227
Joined: 09 Aug 2011
Total Posts: 2570
17 Oct 2015 11:00 PM
hello fellow 2011'er




Hey guys, this time I saved the dragon from the princess
Report Abuse
luciandean2004 is not online. luciandean2004
Joined: 08 Mar 2014
Total Posts: 302
17 Oct 2015 11:25 PM
2.0 is more acceptable than 3.0... 3.0 is completely terrible and un-original, but some things I disagree with. ROBLOX is evolving into a more professional game developing platform (and thank god, it draws away the 5 year old's). 3.0 just looks ugly, but 2.0 is not that bad. Yeah, it supports OD'ers, but why take it away from everyone? Anyways, ROBLOX is getting graphically better almost every update, and it only makes it more realistic. ROBLOX is an easy to work with platform, and I would be glad if it gets more features and capibilities.

To make a long story short: 3.0 BAD, 2.0 OK.
Report Abuse
LightLucario951 is not online. LightLucario951
Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Total Posts: 201
17 Oct 2015 11:42 PM
Even without 2.0/3.0s they will still OD.
Report Abuse
cody123454321 is not online. cody123454321
Joined: 21 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 5408
18 Oct 2015 12:56 AM
Kids OD'ing is not necessarily a problem.
> Quit going to those games
> Stop prohibiting other peoples rights
> Don't judge, their parents are failing
Report Abuse
rex2856 is not online. rex2856
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Total Posts: 3145
18 Oct 2015 01:38 AM
hilary for pres
Report Abuse
CPRAHQ is not online. CPRAHQ
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 3511
18 Oct 2015 02:09 AM
No, 2.0 isn't linked to ODing in anyway. Its the person who chooses to get it, and not everyone who wears it is an ODer.
Report Abuse
CPRAHQ is not online. CPRAHQ
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 3511
18 Oct 2015 02:11 AM
OP is a 9 year old who thinks every package is for ODing.
Report Abuse
budowniczy10 is not online. budowniczy10
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Total Posts: 1638
18 Oct 2015 02:24 AM
No, all people can wear what they want its they'r opinion

And join my group
Report Abuse
femaleguest649 is not online. femaleguest649
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Total Posts: 228
18 Oct 2015 02:42 AM
Online Dating is a action not a look. OP get rekt by 3.0 girls who have woman face.
Report Abuse
femaleguest649 is not online. femaleguest649
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Total Posts: 228
18 Oct 2015 03:11 AM
bump ODer noobs.
Report Abuse
dragonwhelp101 is not online. dragonwhelp101
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Total Posts: 653
18 Oct 2015 03:26 AM
WNTS much? People have the freedom to choose what they want to wear. I have seen COUNTLESS 1.0's OD. ODing is an action, not a look.[2]

~I'm not racist
Report Abuse
megatiger78 is not online. megatiger78
Joined: 18 Oct 2012
Total Posts: 349
18 Oct 2015 03:33 AM
SUPPORT
BOT THIS UP NOW
Report Abuse
mathsman49 is not online. mathsman49
Joined: 28 Jul 2014
Total Posts: 1488
18 Oct 2015 04:12 AM
ODing is an action, not a look. [3]
Report Abuse
plastikJoker is not online. plastikJoker
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Total Posts: 1320
18 Oct 2015 04:16 AM
yes
support
Report Abuse
ihatecreeper600 is not online. ihatecreeper600
Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Total Posts: 5009
18 Oct 2015 04:17 AM
Theres a difference between "Oding" and "Oder".

"ODing" is an action and "Oder" is a look. Get your facts right.



how can we live on a world without jontron?
Report Abuse
ihatecreeper600 is not online. ihatecreeper600
Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Total Posts: 5009
18 Oct 2015 04:18 AM
Wasn't addressing you OP, addressing those who think "oder" is an action.



how can we live on a world without jontron?
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Roblox » Suggestions & Ideas
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image