Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 02:13 AM |
Top 100 posters in designated sub forum categories For example, there would be the top 100 posters in the entertainment category, which holds sub forums such as video game fans, pop culture, video creation and roleplaying. The other categories would have top 100 posters too, I'm just using entertainment as an example.
The way this would work would be, every month the top 100 people in, for example the entertainment category would be the 100 people who made the most posts in a month, so every month the top 100 posters refreshes. It wouldn't have to do with overall posts, just how much you accumulated over the course of a month. Obviously this would mean sending more forum mods to the forum so they could ban spammers from becoming top 100 posters to make sure people aren't spamming for it.
This wouldn't be a life changing update or anything but it'd be a cool feature. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
cruon
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 6831 |
|
| |
|
iWindowz
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1809 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 02:32 AM |
support
#code --hello there! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 11:40 AM |
| The top 100 posters feature has been broken for years. First fix that system. Then focus on other stuff. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 11:41 AM |
| This would be one way to fix it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
Cirv
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Mar 2014 |
| Total Posts: 14344 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 01:29 PM |
that system is broken and i think that system is not necessary
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 01:30 PM |
I said it wasnt necessary at the bottom, but okay..?
How is it broken? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cirv
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Mar 2014 |
| Total Posts: 14344 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 01:50 PM |
"How is it broken?"
there are people with more than 100k posts (ventus spammed them) and he isnt in the top posters??
yoo?? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 01:57 PM |
| There are people with only 7k posts and they still have the title of "Top 100 poster" when there are people with 50k posts left without any title. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
vasa43052
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Apr 2015 |
| Total Posts: 4438 |
|
| |
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 02:03 PM |
Lmao... If top 100 posters focused on the MOST posts, people with 50k+ posts would keep the title and newer forumers would have no chance in becoming top 100. Botters and people whove been foruming for years would take it over, that'd be stupid af,
If we made it so each category had 100 people who posted the most in a month, everyone would have a chance. And the chances of a botter being top 100 would lower because there would be mods which would watch out for spamming and botting in each category (5 mods or so per category), and when findimg spammers and botters they would ban them from the top poster title This is broken because it gives more people chances at becoming the top 100 posters, rather than people who've just been posting since 09? Your logic is broken |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 02:06 PM |
@cyber
Like I said in my post If top 100 posters focused on the most posts in general, botters and people who've been posting actively since 09 would take the titles over. Thos gives newer forumers a chance.
So uh It's broken for giving newer people a chance? Ok lmao |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 02:07 PM |
| You haven't been reading what I've been saying. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
|
| 04 Oct 2015 02:10 PM |
Mb
Yes that's why I'm saying to replace the old top 100 forumers with this, because the old version is broken. so ?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
Deusific
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 16151 |
|
| |
|
| |
|