generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
Home Search
 

Re: Bernie Sanders is going to win it all

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
ThugTwig is not online. ThugTwig
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Total Posts: 3306
09 Sep 2015 11:14 PM
Trump is gonna lose LOL
Report Abuse
RulerDomino is not online. RulerDomino
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Total Posts: 44172
09 Sep 2015 11:20 PM
If you thought trump had a chance in the first place you're a fool. Same with Hillary.
Report Abuse
iiAirstrike is not online. iiAirstrike
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Total Posts: 2075
09 Sep 2015 11:21 PM
Up like donald trump
Report Abuse
ThugTwig is not online. ThugTwig
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Total Posts: 3306
09 Sep 2015 11:22 PM
Bernie sanders is like the only decent human being there
Donald trump is a racist that hates Mexicans and Hillary was in scandals
#feeltheburn
Report Abuse
sdght34 is not online. sdght34
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Total Posts: 5781
09 Sep 2015 11:23 PM
Sanders has 0 chance.
Report Abuse
iiAirstrike is not online. iiAirstrike
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Total Posts: 2075
09 Sep 2015 11:23 PM
^

burned
Report Abuse
Breadcounts is not online. Breadcounts
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Total Posts: 3397
09 Sep 2015 11:23 PM
'sanders has 0 chance'

the internet disagrees
Report Abuse
Stagsz is not online. Stagsz
Joined: 20 May 2012
Total Posts: 1910
09 Sep 2015 11:23 PM
feel the bern
Report Abuse
sdght34 is not online. sdght34
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Total Posts: 5781
09 Sep 2015 11:25 PM
@breadcount:


The internet is pretty irrelevant, since most of it is on welfare. People on welfare don't vote. Also, Socialism is an automatic failure for a nation of the size of the United States.
Report Abuse
Stagsz is not online. Stagsz
Joined: 20 May 2012
Total Posts: 1910
09 Sep 2015 11:26 PM
its not burned its


berned


god get it right
Report Abuse
billythefail is not online. billythefail
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Total Posts: 684
09 Sep 2015 11:27 PM
raa is going to win it all*

RAA OR DIE
Report Abuse
VialOfSands is not online. VialOfSands
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Total Posts: 62682
09 Sep 2015 11:27 PM
Sanders isn't going to win. The only people who want Sanders to win are ignorant teenagers like yourself who think Sanders's promises of free crap won't come at a cost.

Do you even know what socialism is lol

Clinton has a better chance than him
Report Abuse
emilyjeanstone is not online. emilyjeanstone
Joined: 07 Jul 2015
Total Posts: 178
09 Sep 2015 11:28 PM
well tbh a lot of people say theyll go for someone and then when you ask them if they voted a lot later they'll say they were too lazy or make up some excuse

- emma
Report Abuse
iKeno is not online. iKeno
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Total Posts: 27490
09 Sep 2015 11:32 PM
well bernie helps college tuition and stuff with education so it's already an a+ in my book.
Report Abuse
VialOfSands is not online. VialOfSands
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Total Posts: 62682
09 Sep 2015 11:33 PM
At the cost of the economy lol.

You think your free college tuition is going to help you get somewhere in life.

You think it's actually going to be FREE xD?
Report Abuse
VialOfSands is not online. VialOfSands
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Total Posts: 62682
09 Sep 2015 11:34 PM
"Sanders framed the need for free public college by saying that, "in a global economy, when our young people are competing with workers from around the world, we have got to have the best educated workforce possible. And, that means that we have got to make college affordable."

While these goals are the right ones, the reality is that free public college would make it harder to achieve them. Part of the concern relates to how best to use government funds. The idea would cost $70 billion per year, more than twice what the federal government spends on Pell grants. And much of that money would provide a free education to students whose families can already afford it.

But even more important than how much we spend and who we spend it on, we should ask ourselves what impact free public college would have on the delivery system of higher education. That is, would free college make higher education more efficient, more innovative and higher quality?

This question is not insignificant. At a basic level, there are two routes to affordability: subsidizing to bring price down or making something cost less to deliver. The focus of government policy for decades has been on the former approach. We need more of the latter.

And cost aside, it's becoming increasingly clear that the system often fails to deliver the high-quality educational pathways that many students need to be successful in the modern workforce. For example, as I mentioned in my last post, a recent Gallup-Lumina Foundation survey found that only four in 10 Americans agree that colleges are changing to "better meet the needs of today's students." Only 13 percent of respondents felt that college graduates are "well-prepared for success in the workforce."

Given the shortcomings of the status quo, it's important to ask if free public college would make the system more cost-effective. And would it lead to a larger variety of high-quality, flexible options, fostering, as Sanders mentioned, the "best educated workforce possible"?

Unfortunately, there are good reasons to be skeptical. Right now we have a decentralized system where students can take much of their student aid with them to the institution of their choosing. This enables a wide variety of organizations – public and private – to offer a range of different educational programs.

In contrast, free public college would limit choice as many private institutions, now trying to compete with a highly-subsidized, free public option, would likely struggle to survive. In addition to reducing options, this would significantly reduce pressure on public institutions to serve students effectively.

Many free college proponents would likely point out that by providing aid directly to institutions, the government can actually exert more direct control over how they operate. For example, Sanders' bill would require institutions to reduce their reliance on adjunct professors. But are such top-down controls really likely to create the dynamic and innovative system that we need? By trying to dictate innovation from Washington, such a proposal is more likely to create a system that is rigid, bureaucratic and unresponsive to the changing needs of students and the economy over time.

Some readers would rightfully ask: If a decentralized, choice-based system is so virtuous, why do we see so many issues with quality and cost under the status quo? As my colleague Andrew P. Kelly and I wrote last year, two fundamental issues plague the current system. First, for a variety of reasons, institutions have much more incentive to meet enrollment targets and pass students through than to help ensure they are successful after graduation. The recent debacle with Corinthian Colleges is an extreme example of this. In short, institutions need more "skin in the game" in terms of the outcomes of their students.

Second, there are a remarkable number of regulatory barriers preventing new and innovative educational institutions from gaining a foothold. Thus, what occurs naturally in other industries – innovative market entrants shaking up the status quo – rarely occurs in higher education. Policymakers must work to clear out unnecessary regulatory underbrush that impedes new options.

Fundamentally, the "price" of free public college is more than the money taxpayers would spend on it. By moving us to a system based largely on public institutions managed through top-down regulation, Sanders' proposal would exacerbate the challenges above, not solve them.

Instead, policymakers should look to foster more entrepreneurship in higher education while giving all institutions a real stake in their students' success. Rather than reinforcing the status quo, such reforms would move us toward a higher education system built for the 21st century."
Report Abuse
Stagsz is not online. Stagsz
Joined: 20 May 2012
Total Posts: 1910
10 Sep 2015 06:32 AM
You quoted but you gave no source..?
Report Abuse
KiIIah is not online. KiIIah
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Total Posts: 23251
10 Sep 2015 06:49 AM
lol i rather have trump for president and im mexican at least america will be still great under trump.

bernie will kill america
"FREE STUFFF XDDDDD"
thats what most of his supporters want not a better america lol


Hello my name is Killah and I'm the prophet of Arcadia.
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image