|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:20 PM |
From the Office of the Solicitor General, dated 9/2/2015 by the Solicitor General.
September 2nd 2015, 8:19:53 pm
United States v. Kenny1160 : 18 U.S. Code § 1831
FORMAL INDICTMENT, BY THE OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL AND THE UNITED STATES.
The defendant has been formally indicted on the following charges,
Economic Espionage (18 U.S. Code § 1831) Economic Espionage (18 U.S. Code § 1831) Economic Espionage (18 U.S. Code § 1831) Economic Espionage (18 U.S. Code § 1831)
< 4 COUNTS >
1. Kenny1160 is accused of illegally distributing confidential trade secrets of the corporation, Tim Hortons. Evidence of such is clear, and may be found on the case documentation.
Kenny1160 is to participate in the scheduling of his case thereof, or his refusal to do such shall be perceived as a waiver of his right to be a member of the scheduling. Failure to arrive at the scheduled date shall be considered evasion, and shall be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
https://trello.com/c/Tz3UjGV1/916-united-states-v-kenny1160
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kilos2
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 2024 |
|
| |
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:28 PM |
| a)In General.—Whoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent, knowingly— |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:29 PM |
i accuse myself for being too cool of a dude
plz make a trello thank u |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:30 PM |
| Didn't benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality or foreign agent(s). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:35 PM |
| Also Indictments are to be done by a Grand Jury! 5th Amendment |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:39 PM |
You're appealing an indictment? That's interesting.
Secondly, one could argue that the public disclosure of such trade secrets not only revealed the information to entities whom are foreign instruments to the COMPANY thereof, but also distributed it to the open market, where persons whom are entirely of foreign origin may receive such.
There is no purpose in filing fruitless appeals, even upon the conclusion of the case itself. It's quite clear the crime was committed, so what's the issue here?
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:40 PM |
sry sir, but indictments are only done by grand jurys for felony offenses, and are really just part of practice, not of due process. no requirement for a grand jury, other than state law.
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:41 PM |
| They were group payouts, not trade secrets. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 10:50 PM |
Let me just display a small portion of the United States' argument right here, to explain how Kenny1160 committed the crimes shown here,
1. The audits were images of trade between a corporation and one it's constituents thereof.
2. No piece of the audits was made public by the corporation, and as per such, direct implication that such records of trade were intended to be private (as are all portions of the audit) was made.
3. The only viable method for the audits to be brought to the court, would have been upon probable cause and a search warrant, neither of which Kenny1160 had. It's no crime for a corporation to simply make a payment, within the constraints of law, to another entity; so such probable cause never existed.
Does this answer your concerns?
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 11:22 PM |
1. The audits were images of trade between a corporation and one it's constituents thereof.
Trade is defined as: Commercial transaction involving the sale and purchase of a good, service, or information
The two Robloxians in the picture were paid and I see no evidence showing they sold anything to get these payments.
2. No piece of the audits was made public by the corporation, and as per such, direct implication that such records of trade were intended to be private (as are all portions of the audit) was made.
Refer to #1 reply.
3. The only viable method for the audits to be brought to the court, would have been upon probable cause and a search warrant, neither of which Kenny1160 had. It's no crime for a corporation to simply make a payment, within the constraints of law, to another entity; so such probable cause never existed.
Here you stated payment which the correct term, a payment is not a trade secret.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 02 Sep 2015 11:45 PM |
XDDDD
he made u look dumb af kot
~warrior horse~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 12:54 AM |
@lord; Don't worry, I was just eating dinner, I have an argument still. @iiwashington;
I don't see why you persist. I've shut down numerous arguments presented by you, and yet you continue to try and find workarounds. Unfortunately for you, my case is always full-proof, and these arguments have already been thoroughly accounted for. If you have any further protest, save it for the court. Let me just respond to your previous point.
a. You act as though full evidence of a transaction is included within the burden of proof. It's actually known as exculpatory evidence for your client, Kenny1160. You are the party intended to prove a monetary transaction did or did not occur.
b. The transaction is not required to be any form of trade of goods or services, indemnification for personal damages also qualifies as trade. Any monetary exchange is a qualifier of trade.
c. The “trade secret” in question is not the information itself. It's the individuals involved within the exchange. Those individuals are, in some way or another, involved with a trade deal, which is a means for the company to ascertain it's control on a certain field (by ensuring that it's records of trade are not released).
d. It's at the discretion of the company to reasonably determine what is and what isn't a secret of trade.
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 01:06 AM |
@optitheory**
sorry am tired
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
GodOfRuin
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 707 |
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 02:37 AM |
| Opti doesn't like bad cases which are not worth it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MrRCL
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Aug 2015 |
| Total Posts: 24095 |
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 02:40 AM |
You have been reported... please don't break the roblox terms of service... Thanks!
R$0 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
takendogs
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Oct 2012 |
| Total Posts: 165 |
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 07:22 AM |
| Trade requires one side to give something to one side and receive something back. If you say it was payment for damages the one side. Also if that counts as espionage does my saying NightGaladeld bought a gamepass for Soros restaurant count too under your obsurd theory? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AsheinVI
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jun 2014 |
| Total Posts: 8037 |
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 08:07 AM |
wtf kind of trade secrets would tim hortons hide
this is why DoJ is bad |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 10:17 AM |
I have to agree with opti on this
This is a stupid case |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 10:30 AM |
| Aye Ash we ain't bad. People understand the law in different ways. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 12:50 PM |
Actually, whoever referenced some Soros thing, you are fully misinterpreting my statement, and the law altogether. Public records do not qualify as trade secrets in any way, but the information that is detailed within this case, is in fact private record, which can only be obtained through access to company audits; which were marked as private for a reason. Many rights are enumerated to the private sector, and it's the responsibility of company employees to respect them.
Ashein, you have no clue what law is, just resign. Opti, save it for court.
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Sep 2015 01:19 PM |
jk ash, but srs, u don't know law
- U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Pardon Attorney » KOTwarrior |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|