|
| 30 Aug 2015 12:28 PM |
Preamble: I am tired of all the disputes from everyone wanted to know whether certain jobs are Civil Offices or not, so I shall clarify this amendment.
Original Amendment: NINETEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION
SECTION 1. Employment in more than one civil office shall be prohibited. In addition, holding a civil office and having a high-ranking position in the military shall be prohibited.
SECTION 2. A civil office is defined as a Cabinet-level, directorial, or Congressional position, as well as federal judges and supreme court justices. In addition, positions that must be approved by the Senate, except ambassadorial and military judicial positions, shall be deemed civil offices.
SECTION 3. A high-ranking position in the military is defined as being an officer of rank O9 or above, being a joint chief of staff or its chief. While service secretaries, their deputies or under-secretaries, and service chiefs are not military positions, for the sake of this amendment they will be treated as a high-ranking military position.
Amended Amendment: NINETEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION
SECTION 1. Employment in more than one civil office shall be prohibited. In addition, holding a civil office and having a high-ranking position in the military shall be prohibited.
SECTION 2. A civil office is defined as a Cabinet-level, directorial, or Congressional position, as well as federal judges and supreme court justices. In addition, positions that must be approved by the Senate, except ambassadorial and military judicial positions, shall be deemed civil offices.
SECTION 3. A high-ranking position in the military is defined as being an officer of rank O9 or above, being a joint chief of staff or its chief. While service secretaries, their deputies or under-secretaries, and service chiefs are not military positions, for the sake of this amendment they will be treated as a high-ranking military position.
SECTION 4. Exemptions to some positions not being Civil Offices include all City Council positions and Deputy Directors of a senate approved agency also shall not be defined as a Civil Office. (This does not include Deputy Secretaries)
The reason I changed this is because people argue whether these 2 jobs are Civil Offices, when it seems like even in the original amendment they aren't. I am changing this because it clarifies the original amendment to where there are no more disputes.
Signed, FallenRegrets |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 12:29 PM |
| This will probably be voted on in session, but feel free to voice opinions below. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bobherry
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 785 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 12:31 PM |
| You don't sign these things, you support them. But I guess that is the same as support. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
OwenBuild
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 542 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 12:35 PM |
LVCC is not a civil officer with or without this amendment.
~GOP Chairman and President of LVCC Dwight D. Eisenhower |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 12:41 PM |
@Ichigo
At the moment, it could be seen as one by someone who interprets the constitution differently. This is why I want to clarify the amendment so there is no more confusion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 01:04 PM |
SOMEONE WHO FINALLY KNOWS THE LAW.
11/10, YOU GO!!!!
100% SUPPORT
~Adam Venziano | Professional Smartass |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 01:13 PM |
Just impeach RyanRevan for abuse of power. Call a Representative.
~GOP Chairman and President of LVCC Dwight D. Eisenhower |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 01:21 PM |
| Fking LVCC idiots, stop trying to get more power, the reason SCJ are going after you is because you mess up your jobs so much. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
AsheinVI
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jun 2014 |
| Total Posts: 8037 |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 01:21 PM |
signed
~ If you're reading this, you can read. | +23779 ~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 01:49 PM |
i will aye
a very swagalicious muffin |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Inventour
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jul 2015 |
| Total Posts: 13 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 05:56 PM |
| The thing in Section 4 with City Councils could be clarified with a simple SC ruling, this seems unnecessary. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jonyzx100
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 491 |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2015 06:26 PM |
I don't know what to say so..... 360 Cross Map Jump Sliding Around the Corner No Scoped
Signed, Jonyzx100||FaZe Shrek
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Corviex
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jun 2011 |
| Total Posts: 342 |
|
| |
|
| |
|