|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:52 PM |
Demand determines value Rarity determines how easy it is to project something
Proof: look at every SFOTH, Eerie, etc. items with under 100 stock but even 3 competing owners for no offers drives them into the ditch |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:52 PM |
finally some1 with common sense. i tried saying this like last year.
demand > rarity |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:53 PM |
Rarity has as much or more of a part to play than demand
-If RS/Domini/:( hats/etc. didn't have such low stock, they wouldn't be so much Rarity made them like that. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:53 PM |
where as rex has 12391723 owners but op demand so eZ money
yeeee ~moneyman1236 !!!!! REXOLUTION !!!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:53 PM |
Didn't think I'd have to spell this one out to you Don't try to argue its fruitless |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:54 PM |
@demonic
I think I know a bit more than u sry |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:54 PM |
Actually you're wrong, its neither Thats like saying Legit>>>>>DH
famed in da house looking to upgrade |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:54 PM |
| Rarity is just as important as demand |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:55 PM |
@Om You obviously don't because you made this post |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:55 PM |
| yeah but when owners don't compete for offers and are biased it turns into a chryso or an eh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Consal
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 17884 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:55 PM |
Rarity and demand go hand in hand.
If you just have rarity but no demand, then it will not be successful. If you have demand but a lot of it (bucket, valk, sk9r, etc) It will not succeed.
Your comparison with rarity and demand is illogical. You need both. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:55 PM |
| Did you trade up from an egg to a dominus? Didn't think so |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:56 PM |
@consal
Valk is very successful lololol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:56 PM |
this rule only applies to higher level limiteds obviously.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:56 PM |
That has nothing to do with this. @OP
I agree @Consal |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PappyWood
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 44199 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:57 PM |
| I like having this Helmet set. HAd to give over 170k+ for it and I don't care. Nearly impossible to get the whole set and I don't care anymore about value or demand, I care more about how the hats look and how cool they are. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Consal
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 17884 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:57 PM |
| It is successful in retrospect to a 15k value item. It will never reach 100k+ due to the lack of rarity. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:57 PM |
the fact that so many people think rarity matters does affect the value |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Squidr
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 63665 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:58 PM |
if rarity doesn't even matter slightly, why is eerie 1.2m when so many items under 500k look better then it and have 3x the demand
~Flavoured~ Disregard Zeyad, Acquire Frigidus |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:58 PM |
| Why can't valk one day reach 100k? people used to think it was absurd for cf to be 30k |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PappyWood
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 44199 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:58 PM |
| I had to give over 50k for earth helm because like none in circulation. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
caspianIX
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11336 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:59 PM |
explain EST
¤ [¢αѕριαηιχ] ¤ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:59 PM |
@squid
Becuase some want eerie and there are only some eeries If no one wanted eerie it'd be dead |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Consal
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 17884 |
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 05:59 PM |
@omega
Put it this way. If valk had only 100 in stock, it would be waaay more than it is now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Aug 2015 06:00 PM |
@OP You're wrong, just accept it and move on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|