|
| 07 Aug 2015 06:54 AM |
raid as in lead raids and fight
develop as in building and or scripting |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 06:55 AM |
That depends
How rich is the leader that can raid? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 06:56 AM |
leaders who can lead a raid/defence are better because they can actually lead
if your leadership consists on developing alone then you suck ass tbh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ExoSentry
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 722 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 06:57 AM |
leaders who can do both>
xpraetorius/lorcan/cs2401/ocular | exosentry.deviantart | Add 4k to my post count |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 06:58 AM |
"leaders who can do both>"
how does developing come into leading?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:00 AM |
not very @money dude
also no both wasn't an option IDIOT!!!!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ExoSentry
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 722 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:01 AM |
harl
i'm saying that the leaders who can lead raids/defences AND develop are better than either one of the 2 categories within the title
genius...
xpraetorius/lorcan/cs2401/ocular | exosentry.deviantart | Add 4k to my post count |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Natteko
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Jan 2015 |
| Total Posts: 9999 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:03 AM |
i prefer the ones who can develop cause they can actually do something themselves
leaders that can raid is basically every leader on c&g who tries to prove their superiority based on the things other people do which in this case is his/her soldiers shooting people better |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:04 AM |
"i'm saying that the leaders who can lead raids/defences AND develop are better than either one of the 2 categories within the title"
well lsw couldn't develop to save his ass and he was a far better leader than ct was
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ExoSentry
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 722 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:04 AM |
i dont think you've understood a single thing that i've said at all
xpraetorius/lorcan/cs2401/ocular | exosentry.deviantart | Add 4k to my post count |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:05 AM |
leading raids is a decent bit more challenging than it's generalized to be tho
a lot of people who consider themselves capable raid leaders will find they lose a lot more than they think they should be |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Natteko
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Jan 2015 |
| Total Posts: 9999 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:07 AM |
| i wouldn't really know much about the raiding aspect of things anyways since from what i gather from the majority of c&g is that capable leaders aren't really a thing with one or two exceptions |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:07 AM |
"i dont think you've understood a single thing that i've said at all"
i could say the same for you.
"a lot of people who consider themselves capable raid leaders will find they lose a lot more than they think they should be"
a lot of people who develop think they're capable leaders too!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:09 AM |
exactly, which is why i think if you build your clan on development you're less of a war clan and more of a development showcase considering you lack the ability to properly raid
it only gets worse if your officer core has the same mindset |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:12 AM |
god damnit this is what anime makes me understand
good name op..... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Xaela
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1477 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:13 AM |
you need a co-leader to raid if the leader is developing i.e. crimson>crymsonslayer/wisemaximmovies + me |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:13 AM |
| alright i'm glad we've come to an agreement on that one. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:14 AM |
it's still better to have a leader that can raid imo
also thx my name is p good |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Veloric
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 12668 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:17 AM |
leaders that can develop.
why: Who cares if you can win if your fort breaks all the time? Who cares if you lose when your tech is 90% better than the enemies?
Throwing freezers at people that need to chill. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Natteko
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Jan 2015 |
| Total Posts: 9999 |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:19 AM |
i can see how developing is important and i think the main reason i prefer dev leaders is just cause i talk to devs all the time
but who honestly cares if a clan has better tech cause i'm pretty sure the point of going to war and stuff is to compete in who the best clan is so the point is to try and win for sport not to look pretty
if you want to look pretty don't make a clan which are made to fight and go and make a fashion group |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:20 AM |
it's fairly easy to get your hands on decent tech now, original or not
innovation is subjective |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:20 AM |
depends on a lot of factors.
id go with leader that can raid, and is rich |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:22 AM |
| both can't be compared really |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 07 Aug 2015 07:34 AM |
leaders with money and street smarts (roblox smarts?) >
this is coming from a leader whose only developmental aptitude lies in making ads and pretty much my entire era in NFC revolved around war which i highly regret
money makes the world go round unfortunately |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|