|
| 05 Aug 2015 06:54 PM |
So we'll have a GUI picking defenders or raiders, and sort of like at RCL battle grounds both groups are able to vote on either
-KDR Based Victory -Domination -CTF -Hold Terminal
The maps for each of these will either be personally made or go as following.
KDR base will be Varcia Domination will be 2uo's Madison CTF will be the Reaper warzone Terminal holding will be SH2.
And with this system I think it'd be fair since each map I've put it is completely reasonable, so thoughts on it?
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
alanc123
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 363 |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 06:55 PM |
| Sounds interesting, I like it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 06:56 PM |
You're just mad Yia??
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 06:59 PM |
Make it like Galaxy Sector.
Scripts that spawn in a new map and a new gamemode for each server, meaning you can't prepare to raid, or prepare to defend.
Having a vote for it sounds kinda stupid, one of them is going to be easier to win than the other, and it's going to be picked over the other options. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 07:00 PM |
Oh so like TSU's?
Hm could be interesting, but why is the voting sound displeasing if I could ask other than easier to raid/defend.
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 07:02 PM |
Why the system is flawed:
-KDR Based Victory: It's easy to get a good KDR if you outnumber the defenders by 3 to 1, or something like that. -Domination: It's easy to dominate the defenders if you outnumber the defenders by 3 to 1, or something like that. -CTF: It's easy to capture the required amount of flags if you outnumber the defenders by 3 to 1 or something like that. -Hold Terminal: Just a regular raid, probably the most decent of the ideas for all of this tbh, considering the other "game modes" pretty much require an equal amount of raiders to defenders, or an almost equal amount. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 07:03 PM |
Ah so you're worried about numbers, I can agree somewhat.
Thanks for the insight.
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 07:04 PM |
Neither do I see how patrolling would work at a fort like this either, when you have the vote system, unless you just generally spawn the terminal option in from the start, and deploy the vote when the required amount of raiders/defenders are present.
And would only raiders be allowed to vote? Surely it should be their choice how they want to raid, and not the defenders' choice to choose how they want to defend. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 10:08 PM |
Alright then what other rounds should I do since you did bring up some Valid points?
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 10:08 PM |
| did u take the term out of varcia? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iBlakers
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3852 |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 10:09 PM |
will it before crusaders/reapers?
I wanna be the minority! I don't need your authority! Down with the moral majority! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 10:10 PM |
A gun similar to the reapers Blake my group isn't coming out till next summer tho
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 10:11 PM |
no, you can use the rounds, they're completely fine
you just need to find a way so that you can prevent server-flooding from giving too big of an advantage |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Aug 2015 10:12 PM |
Oh wow that's actually smart, so like a raider limit?
SQ is cool |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|