FruitsZ
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 25722 |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:14 AM |
Preamble: Recently the Supreme Court has gone off and instead of doing what their really supposed to do, they have decided they can now overturn impeachments if they disagree with the reasoning. The Senate decides if the Impeachment is just and no one else. The Supreme Court only interferes if guidelines were not followed.
Be it enacted by the House of Represenatives and the Senate,
1. The Supreme Court shall not interfere in ANY impeachment unless the following has happened.
2. The accused has not been given a trial.
3. The accused was never voted out with 2/3rds that are needed from both sides.
4. Mistrial found and guidelines broken.
5. Charge is not treason, bribery, inactivity, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
6. The Supreme Court shall not act as the Senate and overturn if they don't feel the impeachment was right.
Signed, SoH, FruitsZ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:17 AM |
| SC think they can interfer with impeachments, lol. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:18 AM |
| Is this a Constitutional amendment or law? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:18 AM |
| didnt u start a flame thread yesterday |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
FruitsZ
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 25722 |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:24 AM |
This is just a bill.
Also Mask they can save their friends from impeachments if their restrictions aren't limited.
In real life they can't interfere with impeachments so.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:24 AM |
This appears to just be a bill for a law, so I will vote Nay.
Congress does not have the power to overturn Supreme Court Amendments without using a Constitutional amendment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
FruitsZ
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 25722 |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:26 AM |
What...
Since when could the SC make their own amendments, this isn't overturning anything.. Would you guys read. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:37 AM |
| Aye, I do not believe the SC should be able to overturn things we do. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 11:41 AM |
apparently you still don't know how to format a bill:
Preamble: Abuse of power has run rampant within the Supreme Court of the United States. To combat this, I propose the following measures be taken.
Be it enacted by the House of Represenatives and the Senate,
1.) The Supreme Court shall not interfere in ANY impeachment unless the following has happened:
1.a)The accused has not been given a trial.
1.b) The accused was never voted out with 2/3rds that are needed from both sides.
1.c) Mistrial found and guidelines broken.
1.e) Charge is not treason, bribery, inactivity, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. <----- congress would be breaking some laws if impeachment happened without these
2) The Supreme Court shall not act as the Senate and overturn if they don't feel the impeachment was right.
i don't have time to rewrite your bill so i'll just leave you with this but you need some serious help
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Vursuz
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 286 |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 01:05 PM |
Aye
Vursuz |House of Representatives| |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
AluminumX
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 17997 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Unit8699
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1647 |
|
| |
|
SigmaHD
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3328 |
|
| |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 07:05 PM |
| Unconstitutional, we may overturn any action if we find it to be unlawful. Reasoning of the impeachment was brought up because it was not considered a valid charge by the majority, which would constitute it as unlawful. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SigmaHD
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3328 |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 07:17 PM |
| your ruling was unconstitutional btch1 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
RyanRevan
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 684 |
|
|
| 31 Jul 2015 07:19 PM |
I reccomend the Congress familiarize themselves with the Supreme Court Case of Sheldon v Sill.
The Congress cannot limit what topics the Supreme Court may hear. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Aug 2015 08:26 AM |
@Ryan
"Sheldon v. Sill, (1850), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that Congress may restrict the jurisdiction of the lower federal courts by limiting the subjects those courts may hear, even if those subjects fall within the federal judicial power defined by the United States Constitution."
Only talks about Federal Courts, nothing about the Supreme Court. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|