Goaty2
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 6459 |
|
|
| 30 Jul 2015 03:38 AM |
A battle I would pay to see is UAF with benblue level activity go up against VAK. I think this whole war is just an ego booster and filler for Vaktus to feed to his men so they dont think he has totally abandon them. UAF is obviously going to loose no offense to them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
toxic69
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 11787 |
|
| |
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Jul 2015 03:40 AM |
Only because you shutdown servers.
Would have been 5-3 VAK. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
|
| 30 Jul 2015 03:41 AM |
If you only need to defend one The same logic follows with us. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Jul 2015 03:42 AM |
Actually if all went well for both sides then the war score would have been
4-4 tied because we were nearly about to win 2 servers at UAF
and if UAF had won the server that we did not follow you into then you would also get a win.
So war would have been tied. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Jul 2015 03:44 AM |
| Yeah. I wish we could have continued getting wins instead of this... wait game. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Jul 2015 03:45 AM |
| According to the UAF-VAK War terms, both sides are to defend all servers |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|