|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:59 PM |
PLEASE.. DEAR GOD TELL ME, how VAK not defending 1 server is reason enough to SHUT DOWN NOT 1, BUT 3 VAK SERVERS, WHERE 1 RAID WAS ALMOST WON, 1 MORE WITH 500 SECONDS LEFT, and a last 1 which just started?!?!
please. I AM WAITING
also weren't there TERMS for if u didnt defend or not? like did they follow all the correct procedures AND THEN MAYBE SPEAK TO VAK COMMAND and simply count that server as a win
NOT SHUTDOWN 3 SERVERS.
makes 0 sense and they really fvked themselves in the end for doing that. LASTLY, u guys joined a server that was 11v11 and didnt like the terms so u left, (drunk)
UAF=trash |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Valhalas
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 67829 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:00 PM |
Quote from Falsewarrior: "UAF's fault was shutting down servers as a result of VAK's refusal to defend at SMO. We admit that. However,
Allasaphore: Defend against the official raid, Vaktus. Allasaphore: Now. Vaktus, Father of Vaktovia: We agreed to defend SMO and we are defending it, we never agreed to following your troops around. Vaktus, Father of Vaktovia: That is final. Vaktus, Father of Vaktovia: Goodnight, to both of you." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bloxman26
|
  |
| Joined: 27 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7509 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:00 PM |
because war terms state
vak and uaf must defend all servers |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:01 PM |
Valhalas, those chat logs hardly even tell us anything.
Cool, so Vaktus said we will not follow you around into other server hoops after we already defended from you. Want a cookie? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
devPEREZ
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 694 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:01 PM |
"because war terms state
vak and uaf must defend all servers"
exactly, so uaf must defend the servers, not shut them down.
:+) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:01 PM |
| terms also state that it results in 1 win for that side, it doesnt state that u can shut down 3 servers. dumb arse |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Axtrius
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 676 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:04 PM |
| we defended all of our servers, you didnt for up to/more than 15 minutes. that justified the UAF HiCOM's actions |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:05 PM |
both groups should defend all servers
but shutting down servers as retaliation against vak not defending all servers isn't the right move |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:06 PM |
omfg no it does in no way shape or form justify the actions, the actions for not defending a server were originally stated in the war terms, which states if the server isn't defended after the procedures are met, that THAT server counts as >1< win, it doesnt state u can go and shut down the enemy's raiding forces
wat u did was basically give us 3 wins for 1 win. good going, u guys r trash,
i wonder if ur dumpster is mobile |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Epicus
|
  |
| Joined: 05 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2503 |
|
| |
|