Valhalas
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 67829 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:55 PM |
Not just the ones they flood with defenders.
Whether or not server-hopping happened is irrelevant.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:55 PM |
Exactly.
Inb4"UAFshutdownuurservers"
Because you broke 2 war terms, dingos. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:56 PM |
why are you including uaf in the tittle?
its VAK whos not defending servers |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Valhalas
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 67829 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:56 PM |
Brun I do not know both sides of the story, just that there are problems with VAK. Who knows if there is a problem with UAF, too?
Just trying to be as unbiased as possible haha |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:57 PM |
uaf have been responding to every single server
but when they dont respond then we gotta take actions |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ivancs
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 133 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:57 PM |
| vak refused to defend a server with 30 peepz sitting around doing nothing |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lucara
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5741 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:57 PM |
| The hilariously ironic thing about all of this: VAK serverhopped before we did, but we still defended |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Valhalas
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 67829 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:58 PM |
Well, I didn't expect much from VAK anyhow.
At this point its just typical I suppose. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:59 PM |
| are vak claiming that they're defending even though they're apparently not defending the servers UAF is in or what |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 10:59 PM |
UAF's fault was shutting down servers as a result of VAK's refusal to defend at SMO. We admit that. However,
Allasaphore: Defend against the official raid, Vaktus. Allasaphore: Now. Vaktus, Father of Vaktovia: We agreed to defend SMO and we are defending it, we never agreed to following your troops around. Vaktus, Father of Vaktovia: That is final. Vaktus, Father of Vaktovia: Goodnight, to both of you.
was the response when we asked Vaktus to defend. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:01 PM |
@False and Lucara,
technically, there's no war term stating we can't shutdown servers...
http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=168833271
So, yeah...fun... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Valhalas
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 67829 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:02 PM |
Not shutting down servers should be considered a given.
But so should defending all even if the enemy server-hopped. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sencu
|
  |
| Joined: 13 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 11262 |
|
|
| 25 Jul 2015 11:05 PM |
@Valhalas,
pretty much, but since they're exploiting the war terms, why not use a similar reason to justify shutting the servers down, even though them breaking the war terms is more than enough justification in itself. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|