Obtention
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15509 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 10:53 PM |
A lot of people seem to agree with the lists.
Do you think they're the most accurate?
♔ Charles Obtention Radelek II ♔ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
| |
|
Laedere
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 23601 |
|
| |
|
HeIbrecht
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 10013 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 10:54 PM |
| if you didnt switch vak and void as soon as vak got hyped (especially before it had done anything notable to be moved) yes |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Obtention
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15509 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 10:57 PM |
"could use explanations"
I honestly want to but then I would get tl;drs and a lot of wasted effort.
@Helbrecht
Alright, the reason why I switched them is because in my opinion, V O I D isn't doing so well as it was a few weeks ago. jimmywind, thea96, Zapolean have left, and I hear around 13 members, 3 high ranks included, left for VAC.
They lost their main developer, thea, who has their main base. So right now they could technically be considered an in-development clan. Meanwhile, VAK is on the rise to power and are beginning their war with UAF later this week.
♔ Charles Obtention Radelek II ♔ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 10:58 PM |
You never specify criteria (what makes a clan better than another) upon which you make your decisions so the list in general is ambiguous
You don't provide any analysis either but outlining the criteria would help make it more self-explanatory and open to discussion |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Obtention
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15509 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:00 PM |
Belmont, I can agree on that, but that would take a lot more effort and most people wouldn't care to read the entire thing.
♔ Charles Obtention Radelek II ♔ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Seviro
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 46758 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:01 PM |
| No. It's mainly based on clan reputation. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:02 PM |
| It's not accurate unless you put Silverfall in the top in-dev clans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:03 PM |
For criteria you can just list factors if you'd like
i.e. activity, skill, war record, stability, internal community (how fun it is to be a member), external community (basically just maturity in a flame-oriented sense) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:03 PM |
nope lists are flawed to begin with
C R E N A T U S │ THE GODSEND |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:04 PM |
| Silverfall has guns made, a fort, entrance course, a rally being built, and good activity. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Inevera
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2014 |
| Total Posts: 22514 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:04 PM |
They are ok. Change around a few clans and they will be accurate.
R.I.P my keyboard. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Seviro
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 46758 |
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:05 PM |
| A-SOV has everything except the capability to raid the fort. Anything else we're making is extraneous. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:07 PM |
> vak is above void even though they lost to EL
> vs is a top 10 clan for sure /end sarcasm
> Rat is above sf even though we all know rat only wins from floods
> Give yourself more credit you could definitely beat sc until they close their base |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 19 Jul 2015 11:11 PM |
| Also forgot to mention how fc is number one when they cant even score a win off any of sf's bases showing their real raiding skill. If they even tried to raid a base like 8c that required any sort of coordination they wouldnt last a minute |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|