Killicide
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 13715 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:49 PM |
"so because your clan is not very active you need to force other clans to deal with it?"
so because your clan is very active you need to force other clans to deal with it?
there is a difference between being active and not wanting to defend raids that have pre-determined outcomes
activity doesn't mean anything when there's 30 raiders at your base only leaving enough room for the bare minimum to get in
but the beautiful thing about ROBLOX is, noone has to do anything
if you pre-flood my base, I don't have to defend your raid
it was clear from the moment you flooded with 24 people and left only 6 spots that if we came you'd of won the raid so what's the point
10 minute notices give us as a clan an opportunity to process whats going on and at least get some defenders there ready for however many raiders are coming
no ragrets
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:49 PM |
people literally wait until people aren't at a base to raid
how can any war be fun if people just do it the easiest way |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:52 PM |
I blame vak for this spread of stupidity
clans should be defending ALL servers, NO MATTER the numbers
you don't get to pick and choose |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Z007
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11729 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:52 PM |
there should be common courtesy on both sides, but that doesn't mean you have to warn the other group
common courtesy is dismissing some of your members to make it even, maybe not even leaving the raider spawn until it's official
common courtesy is also being mature and handling things like an adult idc that most of us (me included) aren't adults, doesn't mean you can't handle stuff like one |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fleetcom
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 15546 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:53 PM |
anti preflood script people
cmon. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Zapolean
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9217 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:54 PM |
"so because your clan is very active you need to force other clans to deal with it? " yes because it's the point to prove your better. being active shouldn't be a disadvantage, being inactive should. "there is a difference between being active and not wanting to defend raids that have pre-determined outcomes " if it does have a pre-determined outcome you should fix your base "activity doesn't mean anything when there's 30 raiders at your base only leaving enough room for the bare minimum to get in " yes that's why you get skilled too.
zap zap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Killicide
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 13715 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 10:59 PM |
""so because your clan is very active you need to force other clans to deal with it? " yes because it's the point to prove your better. being active shouldn't be a disadvantage, being inactive should. "there is a difference between being active and not wanting to defend raids that have pre-determined outcomes " if it does have a pre-determined outcome you should fix your base "activity doesn't mean anything when there's 30 raiders at your base only leaving enough room for the bare minimum to get in " yes that's why you get skilled too."
sorry me and my 170 member clan cant patrol our base 24 hours a day to appease your clan and sorry that we decided to make our base fun and fair
no ragrets
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 11:00 PM |
| u don't have to patrol 24/7, clans will dismiss members so defenders can join |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Desolade
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 4657 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 11:02 PM |
exactly what I said when VOID refused to defend our servers because it was a "server flood"
glad we're on the same page now |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Z007
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11729 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 11:03 PM |
has anyone in this argument considered handling it more maturely
granted a 170 member group can't easily monitor the base consistently unless it has, say, an 80% activity rate or has the base on the group page (like a group game or whatever that shows how many players are on RIGHT THERE)
but i mean, in situations like that the raiding group can just have courtesy and notify the other group before or after they enter the server, it shouldn't have to be a rule or anything like that
if they skip most of the raid (like waiting at the capture point(s) then just implement a feature that prevents them from leaving spawn until it's official, lol
it'd cause a heck of a lot less controversy and arguments, and is way simpler and obvious |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|