epikdud1
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 127 |
|
|
| 23 Jun 2015 10:41 PM |
Hello, today I will be running for the Verdantine governor, and you're probably asking, what can I do that will benefit the Verdantine Sovereignty if I do become the governor? Well here's some things that may convince you to vote for me/and or believe in my words.
The military would display order and enforce peace with strength, I would put most of the tax money into defense and the navy's ships and equipment. Thus, the advisor I pick will be "Ezmra," He's a good and effective military leader. He has good tactics, and he could form our navy into something that should be feared by our enemies.
For our economy we would welcome it and endorse it to the men and women of the Verdantine. For the taxes, I would keep them very low, but I would sometimes increase them for the benefit of the navy and the defense. But back to trading, I would happily have everyone trading in our waters, it does not matter if they're Whitecrest or Verdantine we're all equal men and women of the islands. For my advisor i would pick "DevShertic"
For diplomacy we would be some what peaceful for the most part, but if something happens in our waters i would do something about it rather than lay idle. I guess you could say that we would be passive aggressive against other nations, as i would love to keep peace, but if war calls i will sadly have to answer it. So for my advisor i would pick "Milbert23" As he has been our Governor for a while now and he does excellently as a diplomat.
That concludes it, This is everything possible that I will do for us. I'm not going to lie about things that I can and cannot do. So thank you for reading, and I hope you pick me as your next governor! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jun 2015 11:23 PM |
"For our economy we would welcome it and endorse it to the men and women of the Verdantine."
I hope you're not a native English speaker, this makes no sense. We would welcome the economy? We would endorse it to the men and women? What?
"But back to trading, I would happily have everyone trading in our waters, it does not matter if they're Whitecrest or Verdantine we're all equal men and women of the islands."
I'm confused on why you think we're all equal, but I like the sound of free trade.
"For diplomacy we would be some what peaceful for the most part, but if something happens in our waters i would do something about it rather than lay idle. I guess you could say that we would be passive aggressive against other nations, as i would love to keep peace, but if war calls i will sadly have to answer it. So for my advisor i would pick "Milbert23" As he has been our Governor for a while now and he does excellently as a diplomat."
First of all, regarding being passive aggressive, are you not comfortable being openly aggressive to get what you want? Do you need to put on a charade of still trying to please others to get your way, but still like you? This kind of tactic in diplomacy isn't for me, thanks. Being direct and honest in diplomacy is the way to go, that's doesn't mean sharing everything, but you don't become passive aggressive to get your way when negotiating.
Secondly, I applaud your decision to have Milbert as an adviser, but I see no confidence in you or your ability to negotiate, which is a key skill for this position. You seem to want to tax us to create some empire, some superpower of a navy. I don't want a hawk governing where my taxes go.
Because of these reasons, I would advise you to rework your speech. As it is, I cannot vote for you.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
irunui
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7 |
|
|
| 23 Jun 2015 11:43 PM |
| Ah. Perhaps this is why Milbert will be governor again. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
epikdud1
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 127 |
|
|
| 23 Jun 2015 11:47 PM |
I see, But the endorsing part means declare one's public approval or support of. This means that the people would like to trade with us, Unless you did not know that i don't know what you mean.
Well, If you don't know if whitecrest's citizens trade with us the tax goes to us, And were all human no need to have war every second over people and in a nutshell i'm saying that were all free to trade.
Well i admire your thought of your idea for diplomacy, But what im saying is ill be peaceful but if the time comes for war ill be aggressive with it, Not just try to be peaceful and pushed around by whitecrest.
Well i thank you for my decision of milbert for an advisor, but you may think my skills are flawed. I'm not going for an empire or something along the lines of that, I want a navy that displays order and can keep the peace. Not a empire that is going to toy with taxes, Only reason i would increase taxes if war comes.
Thank you for talking to me about my speech, But i think you misunderstood some of my wording, so read this please if you may.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Jun 2015 11:12 PM |
1. You approve and support the economy? Well, that really makes you stand out! This tells me nothing about your plans to improve the economy, it tells me you like the economy (which tells me nothing).
2. I never said anything about taxes in my second part, I would rather taxes come from Whitecrest. I never suggested war, I'm not sure why war was the first thing that came to mind, you said we're all equal, and I find that ridiculous. Is a self-made millionaire equal to a homeless man with no initiative? I said I agree we should have free trade, why are you defending that point? Lol.
3. Then you need to look up what passive-aggressive means before using it in a political speech. Using aggressive naval strategies has nothing to do with implementing passive-aggressive diplomatic tactics, the two are not necessarily related.
4. I mean to say your speech makes you out to be a hawk, not a dove. A hawk is one who favors increased military spending (past the point of necessity).
5. My failure to understand your speech is your failure in speech writing, I am a potential voter, you shouldn't be telling me I'm misunderstanding, you should make yourself more understandable. Your grammar is horrific and I have trouble understanding parts of your speech. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
epikdud1
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 127 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 03:30 AM |
| Well, You may keep telling me how bad i am at doing things i guess, But i wanted a good defense, that could do good in battle. Not an empire to steam roll over anyone. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 03:32 AM |
Tradelands is a colonial game is it a war group? no
hahahahahahahahahahah no we claimed the colonial era gtfo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
epikdud1
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 127 |
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 03:32 AM |
| And, If you could stop commenting on my forum, I don't need you to criticize me. You look like you have been doing that to EVERYONE that has a a speech calling them "Hawks" Witch makes no sense when you need navy to not get steam rolled. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 03:58 AM |
| I would actually play this game if it were modern and pirates had ak47s and crap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Jun 2015 12:31 PM |
I'll support BTW i have some more iron for ya
JacobMorcello |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|