|
| 03 Jun 2015 07:47 PM |
The dog is the only thing that seems ugly to me. THE ENVIRONMENTS LOOK AMAZING. The foliage between the rocks and hanging off of houses, Anyone else notice the yellow fog wherever the death claw was? The light shining through the roof where the ghouls were.. The atmosphere looks breathtaking to me. The dog needs fur and everything else will look great lol.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jun 2015 07:50 PM |
| I could care less about the graphics tbh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jun 2015 07:54 PM |
Only thing i care about is immersion, and graphics help with that tremendously.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
adambenn
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5950 |
|
|
| 03 Jun 2015 07:54 PM |
| Compared to other games(witcher 3) there's an obvious difference graphics wise. For a 2015 game you'd expect decent-high end graphics. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jun 2015 07:59 PM |
Lol but the witcher series has always been known for great graphics. Bethesda hasnt - but to me they have exceeded my expectations in the graphics department. Especially because this is what we will be seeing on console, as was with the case with skyim (a guess). If you compare fallout 4 to the xbox one version of witcher 3 and realize that fallout 4 will *probably* be running at 60 fps instead of the shoddy 30 fps that witcher has on console.... It seems as though fallout might actually be quite decent in the graphics arena.
Once again, that dog looks pretty bad though. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Jun 2015 08:03 PM |
although i do want to mention that witcher 3 does have a more vibrant art style, as is expected. but if you look at the amount of foliage, the texture resolution, ect and then account for the fact that fallout 4 will *probably* be 60 fps compared to 30...
Man, i cant get over how detailed the environments look on fallout 4. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|