|
| 23 May 2015 10:05 AM |
Office of Mark S. Emblox Federal Chancellor Senatorial Bills Voting _______________________________________________________________________________________
Note. I'm really sad that I only received ONE bill via private messaging.. You need to step up your games, Senators. - Yes, this continues. We'll just see if the activity increase after the elections and specially in summer. [3]
Voting. 1. Definition Act: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=162648834 2. Political Parties Organisation Act: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=162461329 3. Senator Self Defence Act: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=162680726
Vote like this: 1. Aye/Nay/Abstain. 2. Aye/Nay Abstain. 3. Aye/Nay/Abstain.
You may amend like this: 1. Aye/Nay, I amend to (remove/add/change); Aye to amend. 2. Aye/Nay, I amend to (remove/add/change); Aye to amend. 3. Aye/Nay, I amend to (remove/add/change); Aye to amend.
Signed, Mark S. Emblox Federal Chancellor |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Quitstee
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 198 |
|
| |
|
Quitstee
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 198 |
|
|
| 23 May 2015 10:22 AM |
1. Aye 2.Nay, I amend to remove number One from Section Three; Aye to amend. 3.Aye |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
nikekool
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 253 |
|
| |
|
Xonuz
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1074 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Krenth
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6622 |
|
|
| 24 May 2015 11:53 AM |
1. Aye 2. Nay. If a party simply does not have enough members to actively get one member into congress, it should still be a party nonetheless. I can use multiple IRL parties in multiple countries to back my point if need be 3. Aye |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2015 04:52 PM |
1. Aye 2. Nay. If a party simply does not have enough members to actively get one member into congress, it should still be a party nonetheless. I can use multiple IRL parties in multiple countries to back my point if need be 3. Aye |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Declasse
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 10 |
|
| |
|
chukl
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 660 |
|
|
| 25 May 2015 06:20 PM |
1. Nay - I think this gives the Chancellor too much power... 2. Nay - As I've stated before, just because a party doesn't have a member in congress, it should still be allowed to be an official party 3. Aye - Simple Protection isn't horrible, however, we see abuse of this bill I'll be killing this bill |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 May 2015 09:52 PM |
| @chukl, As I stated in the bill I already have 99% of those powers, I'm just re-defining them; i.e. definition act. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
chukl
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 660 |
|
|
| 26 May 2015 03:26 PM |
| @Marcus Please don't comment on the way I voted? Please PM me privately if you have a question or concern about the way I voted. Thank you! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|