|
| 09 May 2015 07:14 PM |
| it actually looks like the old one, in my opinion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 May 2015 07:20 PM |
| You're absolutely right, that's what it was meant to be. The new face fixed the topological errors of the first one, along with the white outlined anti-aliasing. It made the same face with a clean look. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 May 2015 07:22 PM |
| The new face looks BETTER than the old one. The old one was 2 lines curving into each other. This one is a clean 180 degree arch and it's much more aesthetically pleasing. It amazes me that people can complain about such a small difference. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
jjblox26
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4941 |
|
|
| 09 May 2015 07:26 PM |
"the old one was still classic,
why remove it if there was a option between the 2 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Kaboom680
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 384 |
|
|
| 09 May 2015 07:32 PM |
the whole "the old one was classic" was stupid but i have to say i agree with im there was a choice between the two, why just remove one if we could've had both? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gabe163
|
  |
| Joined: 31 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 869 |
|
|
| 09 May 2015 11:53 PM |
| The new face looks terrible. I prefer the old one because the old smile looks like this: :> |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 May 2015 11:55 PM |
ya agreed
maybe they should sell old one though |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gabe163
|
  |
| Joined: 31 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 869 |
|
|
| 09 May 2015 11:56 PM |
| ^ That'll be a good idea. If not, screw this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 May 2015 01:59 AM |
| I spent 10 robux on the new face and then they make it the default face. Thanks, ROBLOX! I love the old face, it's so nostalgic. I need it back. Badly. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|