JassonG
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1899 |
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 09:47 AM |
| make it so that we can ban them instead of kicking them because they will join back. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
todayholo
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3284 |
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 10:29 AM |
| I somewhat agree but people will abuse it sadly. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 11:14 AM |
"people will abuse it" how? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
todayholo
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3284 |
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 11:37 AM |
| They abuse by ban everyone they dislike. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 12:44 PM |
| It's their group -- they're free to decide who is in it or not. If they're corrupt, then people will leave their group. And a permanent status of the lowest rank isn't a whole lot different than banned from the group for the person who'd be banned. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rexnfx
|
  |
| Joined: 31 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2857 |
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 12:58 PM |
Or you could set the group to request only and keep the request pending
Logic
"When life gives you lemons you take those lemons and burn your neighbors house down!" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Apr 2015 06:24 PM |
It's their group -- they're free to decide who is in it or not. If they're corrupt, then people will leave their group. And a permanent status of the lowest rank isn't a whole lot different than banned from the group for the person who'd be banned. [2]
~nearly almost close to being somewhat fairly decent at rcl~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|