| |
|
»
»
|
|
| |
native Linux port?
|
|
|
|
| 26 Apr 2015 07:42 PM |
"my original point is to use an OS that suits your needs"
Okay, sure that can be your argument, but my point still stands. Why do people use Chrome, FireFox more than Internet Explorer when they all fit your needs?
"you constantly act like you're better."
No, you only think I act better, because you don't do research upon a topic and post educated replies. You then attempt to use words or phrases wrong such as "ad hominem" (yes, I remember) or "egomaniac" and try to belittle people who are educated in a topic. You are probably one of the most arrogant, ignorant persons on this forum who fails to act intelligent. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Manwich1
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1735 |
|
|
| 26 Apr 2015 07:46 PM |
IT is possible, either porting the mac version or using WINE |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Apr 2015 10:51 PM |
| WINE doesn't work and we can't "porting the Mac version". |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Apr 2015 03:01 AM |
damn this escalated quickly
pcmasterrace |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Apr 2015 06:25 AM |
"Okay, sure that can be your argument, but my point still stands. Why do people use Chrome, FireFox more than Internet Explorer when they all fit your needs?" 1. your question answer: for the same reason people don't buy things on the internet from Asian countries same reason why nobody likes fruitcake while never trying it the media, society, other people, everyone wants to be like everyone else the few people who don't want to be like everyone else are put down and shunned away while everyone else supports their own broken view of individuality. however, in your case, those browsers have some things that the others do not 2. that specific point does not specifically address the case at all, but is only an added comparison
"No, you only think I act better, because you don't do research upon a topic and post educated replies." the funny part is that I did do research- enough to make a reply.
"You then attempt to use words or phrases wrong such as "ad hominem" (yes, I remember) or "egomaniac" and try to belittle people who are educated in a topic." there is a difference between attacking and pointing out a quality of the other that is making their argument look weak you're probably going to end up whining about the original way i typed this so i just moved everything around into easy to read sections, wow. -you attack me in a passive way to seem smart, and yes, it exists, people do it often, and when you are properly educated on the topic (because my school had some educator guy come and talk about debates and stuff), you know how to recognize it -since this is not an official or organized debate in any sort, and we're both teens with problems in one way or another, we're going to end up using some sort of attack because teens always get incredibly affected by the simplest thing (except those with some sort of problem where they can't be affected easily) -that's what fl-chan was pointing out, mostly because of your behavior, and your responses, it actually does say a lot about the person -I've debated/argued with you before which gives me a good, strong base to work from, since i know how you argue, what you bring up, and how you put down the opposing side just by studying this makes it incredibly simple to "win"* a debate -in a debate, i state when i am wrong, unlike most, and just being able to think you are wrong in a debate and say you were wrong in a debate makes you much better at a debate. with an inability to possibly be wrong in a debate, regardless if you are actually correct with your information, it just makes it harder for anyone to exactly "win"* *i don't really call it winning, but the other side giving up is when i see they've recognized i only respond to see how long the other will whine and push on, because it's funny to see how much they continue and take it so seriously on a kid's game. it's the same thing I'm doing here, actually.
"You are probably one of the most arrogant, ignorant persons on this [sub]forum who fails to act intelligent." no that's fl-chan and she doesn't even try to be arrogant or ignorant, she just tells you the facts and stuff but then again she's just programmed that way and doesn't try to act intelligent in reality I'd say that title goes to either littlel0l or that other guy who whines about how nothing works for him when he can't do anything with a computer whatsoever which I forgot the name of and look a non-passive attack that's a first, sweetheart wowowowowowow |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Apr 2015 01:39 PM |
"however, in your case, those browsers have some things that the others do not"
All three browsers display content on the internet. All three browsers read and parse JavaScript. All three browsers are HTML5 compatible. All three browsers have plugins (Though Chrome removed support for Java, Flash,etc). Your counter argument is weak. In my argument, there's 3 things that share the same exact purpose, yet we choose favorites.
"the funny part is that I did do research- enough to make a reply."
The funny part is that you didn't make an educated response, and show that you even researched it. Looking at other forums or asking opinions != research. There's a big difference in being open-sourced and "leaning towards programmers". It's an OS that's supposed to be used every day, like Windows and OSX.
"there is a difference between attacking and pointing out a quality of the other that is making their argument look weak"
I'm not attacking nor pointing out qualities. You couldn't even be bothered to do some decent research into a topic and then put your opinions into. You don't know how to code (or probably very little) and you don't know much about Linux and you probably looked at a few forums about other people's opinions. That's not research.
"you attack me in a passive way to seem smart, and yes, it exists, people do it often, and when you are properly educated on the topic (because my school had some educator guy come and talk about debates and stuff), you know how to recognize it"
I did not attack you. Telling someone that they are ignorant is not an attack. Telling someone that they should not participate in the discussion because they are ignorant, is not an attack. Being ignorant != stupid. Telling someone that they're ignorant != name calling. Telling someone that they're ignorant != ad hominem.
"since this is not an official or organized debate in any sort, and we're both teens with problems in one way or another, we're going to end up using some sort of attack because teens always get incredibly affected by the simplest thing "
I am not a teen. I said this earlier, and I am saying this now. My age is not <20 (and >12).
"-that's what fl-chan was pointing out, mostly because of your behavior, and your responses, it actually does say a lot about the person"
"-I've debated/argued with you before which gives me a good, strong base to work from, since i know how you argue, what you bring up, and how you put down the opposing side"
The fact that every time you argue, you don't support with facts but rather opinions, and then get all pissy and call people egomaniacs, because they know more about something than you do. That doesn't make them egomaniacs. Ego is importance pertaining to one's self. You sound like you must have some self-esteem issues to be attacking other people's esteem.
"*i don't really call it winning, but the other side giving up is when i see they've recognized i only respond to see how long the other will whine and push on, because it's funny to see how much they continue and take it so seriously on a kid's game. it's the same thing I'm doing here, actually."
No one here is whining, but if you really want to waste your time with this, then go on, be my guest.
""You are probably one of the most arrogant, ignorant persons on this [sub]forum who fails to act intelligent.""
I dunno why you added sub to that. Suggestion & Ideas is it's own forum. ROBLOX Forum is board index, and ROBLOX is a category.
"no that's fl-chan and she doesn't even try to be arrogant or ignorant, she just tells you the facts and stuff but then again she's just programmed that way and doesn't try to act intelligent"
No, she just talks about things that are off-topic. I was referring to you. You come into a thread, and attempt to troll, and then when you try to be more serious, you attack a person's self-esteem. GG m8, nice debate skills you have there.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Apr 2015 08:22 PM |
skipped a whole ton of the first part because it's mainly just the usual "i'm right you're wrong i can't possibly be wrong" rants i get from the usual s7i bunch
"You don't know how to code (or probably very little)" i severely edited chat voice, posted in .obj scripts and other junk, wrote a few things to get a handful of things to work correctly because what people made for me didn't work the way i told them to make it work for whatever i can't write right now sorry but scripting is not my cup of tea, therefore i could care less (commence meme about how i still do care, at least a little, you know you want to use it) about doing something useful with my knowledge, ex. seeing how much i can break my headphones with DAWs or throw RCA cables around whatever
"I did not attack you. Telling someone that they are ignorant is not an attack. Telling someone that they should not participate in the discussion because they are ignorant, is not an attack. Being ignorant != stupid. Telling someone that they're ignorant != name calling. Telling someone that they're ignorant != ad hominem." ignorant is an adjective, an adjective is used to describe, in short you said "you are ignorant", you are saying i am ignorant, you are describing what you think i am
"The fact that every time you argue, you don't support with facts but rather opinions" doubtful i state what i think, what i have found researching (if applicable), whatever, whatever, who cares i'll say the same thing i said to yozoh a long time ago you will be called things, described as things, etc. based on what you dress like [this "dress like" part is not applicable here] and how you act. in this case, she was whining about being called a [W word that girls get called a lot these days] whilst acting+dressing like a stereotypical [W word]
"and then get all [do you actually realize why we're calling you a teen?] and call people egomaniacs, because they know more about something than you do." we call you egomaniacs because of how you act. simple as that. I'm not the one who brought it up actually, it was curzon of all people, but of course you'd just think I'm insane considering this is gullible idiot land where people think everyone acts exactly how they post Curzon is actually a very intelligent individual and is the age she claims to be
"You sound like you must have some self-esteem issues to be attacking other people's esteem." i only call myself a loser/nerd/whatever as a joke though and if you feel that i am attacking your esteem in any way i do suggest counseling, if you play it right they can tell you a lot about emotions was wrongly forced into counseling for a few months once, due to a teacher not having the right credentials for treating highly gifted children. informed my counselor of the situation, she understood. instead, we talked about the nature of emotions of other children my age (at the time) and about society and stuff a good reason why i can understand a lot about it now
"I am not a teen. I said this earlier, and I am saying this now. My age is not <20 (and >12)." at least unlike most people on roblox you know how to keep your age to yourself few people know my actual age and most of them know because they know me irl
"No one here is whining" i don't mean whining seriously, captain obvious
"but if you really want to waste your time with this, then go on, be my guest." the best part about how i treat debates on here is when people respond with this, acting like they're doing the same thing when i say why I'm continuing to respond.
"I dunno why you added sub to that. Suggestion & Ideas is it's own forum. ROBLOX Forum is board index, and ROBLOX is a category. " being stuck in multiple subforums here, administrating the biggest OT Wikia and currently helping one of the newer ones since i know who she is irl, i know the breakdown, and how the majority, including long-time forum veterans, refer to it (aka the breakdown) "Forum" tab on the sidebar = the forums "ROBLOX", "Club Houses", "Game Creation and Development", etc. = forum group All Things Roblox (ATR), ROBLOX Talk (RT), Pop-Culture (PC), etc. = subforum "native Linux port?", "Catalog suggestion", "Unwanted Hats.", etc. = thread "huihuihuihuyghuyggyuhuihuihiuihuhui" (first response to this thread) = a reply or post
"No, she just talks about things that are off-topic." fl-chan only is off topic when she's referring to her character, otherwise I'd say she is one of the most intelligent people here, regardless if she knows of the subject or not (and the best thing? she can't google it) the actual FL-chan is a mascot for the program FL Studio, and she isn't the only foruming namesnipe that stays in an interpretation of the character actually a handful of accounts that do the same thing as her
"I was referring to you. You come into a thread, and attempt to troll, and then when you try to be more serious, you attack a person's self-esteem." i do not troll, i use sarcasm, there is a difference. i understand the difference is hard to see but i would expect someone oh so smart as you to get it is sarcasm. rather obvious sarcasm.
"GG m8, nice debate skills you have there." "GG m8" is a good reason why people are still thinking you are younger than you may claim. meanwhile i've been requested multiple times to be in a debate team, probably due to my education status and reccomendations during the mini-debates held in specific subjects, and being able to handle insults (not taking any of them seriously, but still responding to them.)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Apr 2015 08:31 PM |
| So many paragraphs of nothingness... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Skywaffl3
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 387 |
|
|
| 27 Apr 2015 08:37 PM |
"Almost nobody uses linux"
You use iOS? You use steve job's stolen, prettied up version of linux.
Its a major operating system.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Apr 2015 04:46 PM |
"i severely edited chat voice, posted in .obj scripts and other junk, wrote a few things to get a handful of things to work correctly because what people made for me didn't work the way i told them to make it work for whatever i can't write right now sorry"
.Obj files if referring to the 3D format, are not scripts. Editing doesn't mean you know how to code and that's why you're not a scripter if all you do is copy and paste other code. A scripter would be able to make something from the ground up.
"ignorant is an adjective, an adjective is used to describe, in short you said "you are ignorant", you are saying i am ignorant, you are describing what you think i am"
Your point? Describing you as ignorant is not calling you a name and is not attacking you. Being described as ignorant is not calling you stupid, I'm not insulting your intelligence in any way and if think that I am then you're ignorant on what ignorant means.
"doubtful i state what i think, what i have found researching (if applicable), whatever, whatever, who cares"
Opinions are outspoken thoughts, what you think and what you tell me is an opinion.
"we call you egomaniacs because of how you act. simple as that. I'm not the one who brought it up actually, it was curzon of all people, but of course you'd just think I'm insane considering this is gullible idiot land where people think everyone acts exactly how they post Curzon is actually a very intelligent individual and is the age she claims to be"
You call us egomaniacs, because you simply do not understand what an egomaniac is. Opinions cannot beat facts. Facts are logical and data proven, opinions are not. If you think you're right and argue with only opinions, then you're an egomaniac because you think your opinions are highly valued, more so than logic. I however have given some facts about Linux.
"being stuck in multiple subforums here, administrating the biggest OT Wikia and currently helping one of the newer ones since i know who she is irl, i know the breakdown, and how the majority, including long-time forum veterans, refer to it (aka the breakdown)"
Take it from someone who has worked with forums on websites before, the link to forums is the board index, the next part will be category (in this case ROBLOX) and then you will get into a forum (in this case Suggestions and Ideas). Look at the definition of forum. It's a place, or meeting where views and ideas can be exchanged. You do not exchange views on the Forum link. And you do not exchange ideas in ROBLOX.
"i do not troll, i use sarcasm, there is a difference. i understand the difference is hard to see but i would expect someone oh so smart as you to get it is sarcasm. rather obvious sarcasm."
"step 1 don't use Linux
step 2 if you have to use Linux then use the 13337 code hax0r skillz that you use to go and WOOWOWOWWOEWOWOOEWOWWWOWOWWOW the system for code code coders and make it work for you thanks"
This is trolling, not sarcasm. Sarcasm involves irony. Your steps involve stupidity.
" is a good reason why people are still thinking you are younger than you may claim. meanwhile i've been requested multiple times to be in a debate team, probably due to my education status and reccomendations during the mini-debates held in specific subjects, and being able to handle insults "
No, I'm pretty sure people think I'm younger than I claim, because I'm playing a children's game. Not because of how I act. If I could some of what I have done that is not against the rules, you'd tell I'm not a teenager. Also 'gg' nor 'm8' aren't exactly new terms out on the internet. Now there's this newer generation overly using it. To put this into perspective, I am a college student, not a dual enrollment student, but a college student. I study computer science, which is mostly about programming and various other things about computers (go figure). I joined Roblox in 2007 (8 years ago) when I was a teen (teen being >12 so I cannot possibly be a teen). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Apr 2015 06:44 AM |
".Obj files if referring to the 3D format, are not scripts." "posting in" "Editing doesn't mean you know how to code and that's why you're not a scripter if all you do is copy and paste other code." relevancy? "A scripter would be able to make something from the ground up." which I have done, on occasion, nothing major, and usually glitch-filled madness, as usual
"Your point? Describing you as ignorant is not calling you a name and is not attacking you. Being described as ignorant is not calling you stupid, I'm not insulting your intelligence in any way and if think that I am then you're ignorant on what ignorant means." a simple grammar lesson I did not question what it meant reread the statement
"Opinions are outspoken thoughts, what you think and what you tell me is an opinion." o·pin·ion /əˈpinyən/ noun: opinion; plural noun: opinions a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
"You call us egomaniacs, because you simply do not understand what an egomaniac is." once again the whole thing came from curzon, go whine to her if the usage upsets you. she's a bit better w/ words than I am "Opinions cannot beat facts. Facts are logical and data proven, opinions are not." thanks for telling me something I already know "If you think you're right and argue with only opinions, then you're an egomaniac because you think your opinions are highly valued, more so than logic. I however have given some facts about Linux." and I accepted them, stating I was wrong in the process, but you have yet to actually respond to my main point with anything but "You're ignorant". if you are going to accuse me of thinking I'm always right, please take a look at yourself
"Take it from someone who has worked with forums on websites before, the link to forums is the board index, the next part will be category (in this case ROBLOX) and then you will get into a forum (in this case Suggestions and Ideas). Look at the definition of forum. It's a place, or meeting where views and ideas can be exchanged. You do not exchange views on the Forum link. And you do not exchange ideas in ROBLOX." hence the term "sub" beforehand. it may work that way for you, but even a handful of moderators view it the way I defined.
"This is trolling, not sarcasm. Sarcasm involves irony. Your steps involve stupidity. " I'm starting to REALLY think you are oblivious to sarcasm whatsoever my steps are not even steps, if not obvious enough "step 1 don't use Linux" aka use an OS that works for what you do "step 2 [other stuff]" common teenspeakmemespeak as a joke, obviously. but if Linux is a code thingywhatever with some preset os things people have made (thanks google?), it should be easily editable for your "native Linux port" which by now we aren't even on the topic on and it's just you pushing it on for a self-esteem boost
and by now, I can't really put you all separate, lop's right, this is gullible idiot land, regardless if they're gullible or idiots or both, every single person who claims to be a s7i forumer (note: i am still classified as an OTer) ends up being one or both of the two roughly half of them are people who can't read and comprehend basic rules to the point where they put them down and attack them and the rest think they know everything and act like they're in a top university studying every single course provided there. arguments always have someone pushing it on for a stupid reason, hence why i sit back and give minor responses to make them write wordwalls that take me less than 5 minutes to type out a response to and two minutes to fix a few things in it
"No, I'm pretty sure people think I'm younger than I claim, because I'm playing a children's game. Not because of how I act." well it's probably both now that i think of it
"If I could some of what I have done that is not against the rules, you'd tell I'm not a teenager" you what
"Also 'gg' nor 'm8' aren't exactly new terms out on the internet. Now there's this newer generation overly using it." and said newer generation is not going to be fixed up at all.
"To put this into perspective, I am a college student, not a dual enrollment student, but a college student. I study computer science, which is mostly about programming and various other things about computers (go figure). I joined Roblox in 2007 (8 years ago) when I was a teen (teen being >12 so I cannot possibly be a teen)." i could play the EXT card and go all ase atorne and claim you prove this all, but then again, i said i was classified as extremely gifted and i can't prove that without violating multiple rules from multiple sources, so i'll just imply this is true for the moment and continue (if it's false, it just adds you onto the second half of the majority [if not all] of s7i forumers) if I'm not mistaken a teen is usually classified as anyone older than 13 and younger than 18, by 15 they're wannabe adults and always try to override their parents and stuff. it's kind of strange how you suddenly claim to be some computer science person. it's really hard to believe it, considering you are not the only one who brings up being in college for computer science in the middle of an argument regarding something that regards computers.(coughcoughminklecoughsaldorcoughfattyguineacough) it just comes up so often it's hard to believe sorry
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dosbox7
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Apr 2013 |
| Total Posts: 7 |
|
|
| 27 Aug 2015 05:21 PM |
| Roblox deserves to be ported to Linux in a NATIVE way. The Linux kernel is very secure, and it's lightweight, meaning that it's easier for PCs to run it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Aug 2015 05:25 PM |
windows has security issues and isnt open source is illegal to see how windows works, and besides its expensive af (no, windows 10 is not free, you need to buy windows 7/8.1 first), also large companies use linux for their programs (except maybe microsoft) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
»
»
|
|
|
|
|