|
| 18 Apr 2015 12:55 PM |
---------------- I. Introduction. II. Body III. Conclusion. ----------------
I.Intro ------- The Primary Election Act (PEA) is the real way the election's happen. A candidate is picked by a national party to be the presidential candidate, such as, The Republican National Party will come up with a way to have an election inside the party. Which means, the people of the National Party must elect a presidential candidate. Instead of having support groups, you will have primary elections. This will help with the majority. There are several parties out there, with the (PEA) we would be able to have a majority election. Naturally, the presidential candidate gets to pick the Vice Presidential Candidate, but the National Parties will decide how they will pick a majority leader.
II. Body -------------- Just like any Senate or House of Representatives election, they will have ballots, the person who is running for presidential candidate inside the party must have around 35+ signatures to get onto the ballot (Again, the party chooses which way they want the elections.) You may be thinking, support groups are fine, well, with the (PEA) the MAJORITY of the Democrats, Republicans, Plutocrats, will decide how they make the elections. I suggest that you vote aye because of the sense in this. Anyone would rather have a majority elected presidential candidate then someone just running in a support group. As I previously stated, the parties decide most of this. Whether they would let the presidential candidate choose his VP Candidate or not. The elections would be stronger and there would be less alts. The people of the national party they are supporting would be happier. It would be less of a hassle to find out who voted for who. The majority would be strong and overall the party that wins the elections would be happy with both the VP and Presidential candidate.
III. Conclusion --------------- I urge you to vote aye for this bill/act. You may argue, but in my eyes the majority is what matters. Wouldn't you want a president voted on by the majority of your party? I would. If you have an questions regarding, ask me. I can explain it thoroughly and quickly. Just look upon the way we elect president's in the real world. The majority would be happy on both parties and the people would elect which president that would do a better job.
Thank you,
TheFinestPatriot |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iBuzBear
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3315 |
|
| |
|
bill52600
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3464 |
|
|
| 18 Apr 2015 01:13 PM |
| Absolutely not. Will lead to manipulation and gridlock in Congress and the Oval Office. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Apr 2015 02:14 PM |
@Bill54600,
Well we kinda need a bill like this. For example. When you have someone who owns a political party, that party is approved by Congress and allied to Congress. The ISSUE, however, is that there is no regulation on how the Party observes supporting members of their party. The Chairman picks one person to endorse and that is it. No one else. There is 1 other democrat running for President this summer, and they currently have no recognition, nor any possibility of being the Democratic Nominee. They don't have that fair opportunity.
In the GOP, I have encouraged people to run, and we have 1 person facing against me in the GOP Primary Elections which are going to take place next Friday.
I support.
- Ronald W. Reagan | United States Senator (R-MA) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Apr 2015 04:13 PM |
I like it, but I feel it could be tweaked
-Senate Majority Leader YoutubeDizzle100(R) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Apr 2015 08:26 PM |
Could add more details, but, support.
- EthanTheDev, Defense Criminal Investigative Service Director.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|