| |
|
|
| 13 Apr 2015 11:57 PM |
"Of all time"
How can we compare swords clans that don't exist any more with clans of today?
I say sword clans years ago were better then the ones now but don't exist now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Apr 2015 11:58 PM |
1) NFC 2) TSG was it 3) NB 4) RB 5) SF idk much more for "ALL TIME" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:01 AM |
Based on what? Purely skill? Endurance? Likability? Popularity?
Which variables should we consider? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:02 AM |
no it's not
NFC and NB being the only sword superclans of its time RB and SF being the strongest sword powerclans of their time FWC wasn't a sword clan back then and yeah |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:05 AM |
So basically you are saying just because they are superclans they are top 15? Lol RB and SF FWC wasn't a thing back then so I can agree with you on that
I can definetly say there were better sf clans then those two superclans
Also consider "ALL TIME"
Not back then, so consider this time too, and no RB and SF aren't top 5 lol, I know a lot of clans that were better then those two.
And I am not even going to come up with my own list cause I am going to be bias'd anyways. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:08 AM |
I'd have to put NFC in the top 3, all things considered. We're on of the few sword clans which stood the test of time. We're still alive and going just fine to this day.
Granted, we are behind in a lot of areas which modern-day clans have pioneered. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:09 AM |
Only reason why my clan is hated on C&G is because we have survived for over 4 years now and won't die when C&G wants us too.
It's funny how hard C&G tries to kill an invincible legacy :^)
HAIL TDW |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:09 AM |
| A lot of SF Clans back then were so OP |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:10 AM |
@Lord
Exactly my point, and a ton of them were unnoticed too.. so you can't say who's best and worst without knowing 100% of ALL sf clans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:12 AM |
| No offense to SF and RB but they would have been demolished back then |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:14 AM |
I really don't like SF< especially after they couldn't admit the fact that they lost at our base and had to admin abuse when they wanted to check logs cause apparently "TDW AA'D" and funny thing is he saw we didn't AA (ywis) and he health'd members: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=159273776
RB is alright |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:15 AM |
NFC was a top sword clan for a long time NB was one of the first sword clans, but it was considered a "clan" because it only warred gun clans because of the lack of sword clans back then a few years later people tried to copy the idea of sword clans and made trash forts a few power clans came and failed TSG was one of the best power clans of its time RB and SF don't make my list for top clans, but let's just consider this
Let's say "ALL time" ok? Statistically.
The sword clans back then were really hype, like NFC and NB. Believe it or not NB's history has some of the greatest fighters you'd see out there now. So when you say "ALL TIME" I'm including those great fighters that were in NB at the time then and the time its going passed right now
NFC has a bunch of members, was really active, and was raided and raided a lot. They werea really respectful group. NFC is #1 because "ALL TIME" Back in the time of NFC, it had wonderful fighters you'd see today as well, also fought VAK with yes, support members, but "ALL TIME" means any period and all periods.
TSG because they were the first sword power clan to actually succeed and were really active, and most of the time, activity was the best part of sword fighting in most forts that sword clans made back then, and even to this day really.
RB because they were a noticed sword clan from while back as well and were raided often. Also they were really honorable and fair, but I gotta say, back then they weren't that good at all to be honest, so maybe it's just out of the honor they had back then that I added them
SF was always ally based in wars, so the statement "No allies" in ever war was trash. SF was known as a very active sword clan, even though you know... They won defenses at a fort, were named a power clan, and whatever. The fort was literally just fighting at the flag.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:15 AM |
| TDW is good so was Sapphire Supremacy, SC, NFC, TDE, RL, most have died |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:16 AM |
well, I said statistically and didn't add any statistical information.
clap. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:17 AM |
"TDW is good so was Sapphire Supremacy, SC, NFC, TDE, RL, most have died"
I only did 5 of the top 15 clans of all time. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:18 AM |
| Was replying to Cel notyou GG |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:19 AM |
"TDW is good so was Sapphire Supremacy, SC, NFC, TDE, RL, most have died"
nfc didn't die
Bulwark of Topixa |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:21 AM |
| Read "most" a lot of unsaid ones |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Apr 2015 12:22 AM |
HAIL REV'S AERONIUM
back in Aeronium's prime, it was easily number one. it curb stomped SF.
ACCEPT MY LOVE ☆ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|