Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:09 PM |
Sorry for the word wall but I don't want people to get the wrong idea simply because it's boring digging up chatlogs for an online argument
Falsewarrior has fabricated an entire story where RAA is to blame for everything. He takes chatlogs out of context and uses them to argue. Well, I'm here to clarify everything. First, I'd like to remind you that I never have these issues with respectable leaders. Paul and I knew that False would be a pain in the ass to deal with which is why we agreed to allow TGI time to convince False to drop out and allow a more useful group to assist against the RAA/SF juggernaut.
We pounded both groups mercilessly for weeks on end. Falsewarrior concluded since his bases were harder to raid, it was somehow TGI's fault that they were sustaining so many losses. False quoted a "10/30" success rate on UAF. What he doesn't mention is most of those raids were on an updated UAF recruitment center. Our raids on Phoenix City were 9/12 and the 3 were just because of broken jeep (ironic, eh?). When confronted by TGI Lords Boostpowah (bootypowah) and Shadownize about UAF's lack of combat ability, he became defensive and accusatory. He talked down to his TGI allies that had sustained most of our raids and were still fighting. (Theres a reason so many TGI joined RAA to fight UAF)
So, 6 weeks later, RAA and SF agree to 1 v 1 TGI and UAF respectively. SF swiftly defeated TGI and that was that. And of course, as predicted, False is being difficult. We worked out some terms and I agreed to them. Then UAF added a term I strictly said I did NOT want: raid times. Well the war began and I was out. I had left Coventry 1 open, the version that contained Control Points. Well, UAF raided and immediately noticed the guns were broken. So Paul, on his own accord, opened Coventry 2, a base not rated for server floods. UAF gathered 2 wins in 3 hours (not sure why not more but lol XD), and Senior Admiral Nowihaveyou ordered the base closed, and Coventry 1 reopened. However, the guns still didn't work, so Paul reverted to an older version of Coventry without the Control Points. UAF got 0 wins on this fort and complained about health glitching guns.
Well, they demanded I fix the issue and after a day of bug checking and fixing, we reopened the original Coventry with the control points. UAF raided 2 servers immediately and was beaten back in both, losing horribly. Falsewarrior freaked out and accused me of breaking war terms, which is expected since it's False. We tried to explain but he completely ignored us and keeps posting chatlogs about war terms and such that is completely irrelevant. Even their General Lucara agreed I had the CPs added in prior to the war.
Well, here we are. UAF is crying because they can't hold multiple points like they make raiders do at their base. Hypocrisy at it's finest. Well, we're done with UAF. I've already dominated UAF 3 times over the course of 5 years even while they had TGI on their back. I don't want to deal with lying crybabies such as Falsewarrior. You're 21 years old, grow the hell up.
That's all. RAA OR DIE |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PIebeian
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6969 |
|
| |
|
qwbbedly
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 3119 |
|
| |
|
Karmasx
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 260 |
|
| |
|
Zapolean
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9217 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:12 PM |
| I don't get why this war is so intense. Why not say both RAA and UAF is good? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
INVASlON
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12830 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:12 PM |
| I don't recall most of those statements about UAF, but you did break war terms |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:12 PM |
| Because UAF isn't good. They're top 10 but they do not belong in the conversation as a top group. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:13 PM |
I don't recall most of those statements about UAF, but you did break war terms ----------------------------- Actually, I didn't. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PIebeian
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6969 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:14 PM |
why cant we have uaf defend cov and raid kopervich and raa defend kopervich and raid cov |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iKeno
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jan 2008 |
| Total Posts: 27490 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:14 PM |
| does no one understand that raa has cp's before the war? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Garzen
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 7584 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:14 PM |
| To was expecting this to say "UAF sux" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:16 PM |
| And also, what's with all this accusing about breaking war terms? Whether I like the RAA or not, I know for a fact, they're honorable. I have like five close friends, and I know, they don't cheat. So, why not like hold a court case on this or something? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:17 PM |
"Well, they demanded I fix the issue and after a day of bug checking and fixing, we reopened the original Coventry with the control points. UAF raided 2 servers immediately and was beaten back in both, losing horribly. Falsewarrior freaked out and accused me of breaking war terms, which is expected since it's False. We tried to explain but he completely ignored us and keeps posting chatlogs about war terms and such that is completely irrelevant. Even their General Lucara agreed I had the CPs added in prior to the war."
If you want to lie, make it less obvious. [23:28] [UAFGEN] Lucara: RATonemanary: they putting cps on the mountain for RAA [23:28] [UAFGEN] Lucara: Is that for real? [23:29] [RAA] Sasook: you probably have the wrong idea [23:29] [RAA] Sasook: its on your side of the map [23:29] [RAA] Sasook: we fixed the cps [23:29] [RAA] Sasook: so we're adding them back [23:32] [UAFGEN] Lucara: to be honest, we were hoping that there'd be no updates for either base [23:32] [UAFGEN] Lucara: especially with the war starting tomorrow [23:33] [RAA] Sasook: dont worry itll be fair [23:33] [RAA] Sasook: itll be like coventry before we removed them [23:33] [UAFGEN] Lucara: so they'll be in the same positions as last time? [23:33] [RAA] Sasook: no [23:33] [UAFGEN] Lucara: where would they be? [23:33] [RAA] Sasook: well 1 will [23:34] [RAA] Sasook: oh can we start the war at 5' [23:34] [UAFGEN] Lucara: 1 sec [23:37] [UAFGEN] Lucara: what are the updates [23:39] [UAFGEN] Lucara: also, can you make the serversize 20 [23:40] [RAA] Sasook: yeah [23:40] [UAFGEN] Lucara: can you come to cov to show us where the cps will be [23:41] [RAA] Sasook: still working that out with peathis
And then the CPs were never discussed for the rest of the night
-Lucara |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Indicize
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1373 |
|
| |
|
ice180
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 12382 |
|
| |
|
INVASlON
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12830 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:18 PM |
I'm pretty sure UAF raided twice, won twice.
Cov was closed
we raided with HG guns, and lost.
Then complained about it for ages on the forums, then I'm guessing you sent a message to your efficient 1 man dev team, who couldn't fix it. Then UAF for some reason stopped raiding with HG guns (I wonder why), and we were brought to this right here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:18 PM |
[23:29] [RAA] Sasook: we fixed the cps [23:29] [RAA] Sasook: so we're adding them back [23:32] [UAFGEN] Lucara: to be honest, we were hoping that there'd be no updates for either base [23:32] [UAFGEN] Lucara: especially with the war starting tomorrow -------------------------------------- Proof they were added the night before. Thanks Gears, didn't feel like getting the chatlogs. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Exoknotz
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2383 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:19 PM |
| Where are the UAF bookworms? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synoan
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15658 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:19 PM |
I'm pretty sure UAF raided twice, won twice. -------------------------------- Correct. Coventry 2 was never supposed to be open. But I allowed you to keep those 2 wins. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:19 PM |
Proof they were added the night before. Thanks Gears, didn't feel like getting the chatlogs
[23:40] [UAFGEN] Lucara: can you come to cov to show us where the cps will be [23:41] [RAA] Sasook: still working that out with peathis
Proof they weren't actually added in. No problem, synoan. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
INVASlON
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12830 |
|
|
| 12 Apr 2015 09:20 PM |
Well it was opened, which would still be the fault of the leader, but who am I kidding?
We should've continued to raid with the HGing guns, I really wouldn't mind, but I see why they didn't. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|