Luigi463
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10468 |
|
| |
|
Ouendan
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2013 |
| Total Posts: 30191 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:35 PM |
| learn spanish and become a proud one |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mantine55
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8417 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:35 PM |
do you think mexico should reclaim its lands in the western united states or expand to the south or neither |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:35 PM |
how do you feel being a manlet?
how do you feel knowing you will never achieve a height of over 5 ft?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
exeras
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4056 |
|
| |
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:37 PM |
Mantine
the US has owned those lands longer than Mexico
and during the time of its annexation lots of the territories had more US occupants than mexican
and lots of the mexicans were more than willing to be part of the US |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Luigi463
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10468 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:37 PM |
@Ouendan
how
it's kidna hard
@Mantine
Reclaim.
Or just merge with Mexico
@Neostic
idk and I don't care about my height as long as I'm not midget sized. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:40 PM |
Luigi
Why do you believe the mexicans should reclaim these lands?
Without the US, today a lot of these lands would be as poor as the rest of Mexico
why would you want to spread your third world filth elsewhere?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mantine55
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8417 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:41 PM |
i think we should merge too
that'd be pretty swag |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:43 PM |
wow these skids
Do you really want the cartels killing and rap ing the american populous
wow you are truly autistic
ruining the US infastructure because you'd think it'd be "swag" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mantine55
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8417 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:43 PM |
"wow these skids
Do you really want the cartels killing and rap ing the american populous
wow you are truly autistic
ruining the US infastructure because you'd think it'd be "swag"
>implying our borders are effective |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:45 PM |
>implying completely opening them would help >implying sharing lands with a foreign third world nation is completely reasonable >implying that doing this would have no negative consequences
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Luigi463
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10468 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:47 PM |
Oh boy...
If America and Mexico merged in the 1700's...
Then America wouldn't be 3rd world... in fact there wouldn't be this giant debt. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Luigi463
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10468 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:49 PM |
ah whatever
can someone else ask questiosn? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
exeras
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4056 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:49 PM |
"more than a month ago" I asked one |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ouendan
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2013 |
| Total Posts: 30191 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:51 PM |
"Cuantas veces te la jalas" Estas preguntas no se preguntan, amigo! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:52 PM |
"Oh boy...
If America and Mexico merged in the 1700's...
Then America wouldn't be 3rd world... in fact there wouldn't be this giant debt."
The rest of Mexico is useless land
during the US Mexican war the US easily swept through mexico and took all the land that wasnt worthless
if we merged with mexico, the mexican populous would be more than unhappy with the occupying force starting uprisings and disorder
your statements are completely unreasonable you should keep to yourself
>mexican education |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Luigi463
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10468 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:53 PM |
@Neostic
OH COULD YOU JUST GO I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW HOW TO ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION IN THE FIRST PLACE. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mantine55
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8417 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 10:54 PM |
">implying completely opening them would help"
um yes because then american law enforcement could take care of them
plus i'm sure if a drug cartel decided to move into a city in the usa, the citizens would be more than willing to pull out their own guns
this is america we're talking about
">implying sharing lands with a foreign third world nation is completely reasonable"
mexico is a rapidly developing nation and is not third world
third world is zimbabwe
">implying that doing this would have no negative consequences"
oh no americans have more land and more economic opportunities wow how on earth would we ever cope
point 4: we took over mexican land in the past and now these areas are economically very important, why wouldn't a similar change occur today?
there is the probable scenario of rich people from usa buying all the land and creating a huge lower class, but this could probably be deterred by raising land taxes for large landowners |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mantine55
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8417 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 11:00 PM |
"The rest of Mexico is useless land"
no it has tons of minerals plus the population of mexico speaks for itself you can't have 100 million people living on just rocks and sand
"during the US Mexican war the US easily swept through mexico and took all the land that wasnt worthless"
ok whatever
"if we merged with mexico, the mexican populous would be more than unhappy with the occupying force starting uprisings and disorder"
probably some, and there would be angry people in usa but i'll bet americans would be like "yay now we own mexico murica ftw" and mexicans would be like "yay now our economy will be good" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 11:06 PM |
>Steeply increasing the crime to let ur mexican friends in
>Law enforcement-Expending thousands of officers and billions of dollars to stop the threat of cartels
>Endangering American lives
>It would not be economical,
>mexicans are unskilled laborers with little education
We took all of the valuable mexican land and left Mexico the deserts and tropical rainforests
I dont think annexing mexico would be worthwhile or we would have taken in it by now
REMEMBER annexing any territory We would have to bring it up to US standards enforce its borders managing the territories managing population drug cartels
The resources in Mexico will not pay for all of this
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Mantine55
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 8417 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 11:17 PM |
">Steeply increasing the crime to let ur mexican friends in
>Law enforcement-Expending thousands of officers and billions of dollars to stop the threat of cartels
">Endangering American lives"
do you think drug cartels would just be allowed to roam free?
no more than they already are. they don't obey laws, the borders don't really freaking matter. the reason they don't head to the usa is probably because we have a powerful police force and national guard
">It would not be economical,"
why
">mexicans are unskilled laborers with little education"
ok then educate them?
besides, they're mostly willing to work and there's nothing wrong with that
"We took all of the valuable mexican land and left Mexico the deserts and tropical rainforests"
ok you seriously need to stop making this statement
most of the land we took from mexico was desert absolutely worthless desert that we made something worthwhile out of california was the best thing we took from mexico
the northern part of mexico is minerals, the south is the fertile region once known as the aztec empire
"I dont think annexing mexico would be worthwhile or we would have taken in it by now"
the only thing we took from mexico was their frontier
the reason we did not take all of mexico is a. it would have been pretty ungovernable then and b. it'd be freaking impossible to march over harsh terrain for hundreds of miles before reaching the heartland of mexico where tons of people would be willing to put up a fight
"REMEMBER annexing any territory We would have to bring it up to US standards enforce its borders managing the territories managing population drug cartels"
dude this is the same stuff they said about california except for the drugs "oh no those dirty spanish people will make bad americans no please don't annex california"
"The resources in Mexico will not pay for all of this"
on the contrary, mexico is rich in resources i thought we covered this |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neostic
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4733 |
|
|
| 31 Mar 2015 11:30 PM |
Jesus christ dude stop grabbing facts from your ar se
Certain cartels are paramilitary forces with more man and firepower than a lot of the police departments here it would be costly to somehow get rid of them And theyre not here now because have no need for a presence in the US except to make sales
"why" What is the cost to maintain 100 millions people?
How do you expect to educate a bunch of third world cholos? We cant even educate the onees currently in our own borders
"We took all of the valuable mexican land and left Mexico the deserts and tropical rainforests"
bs Texas and California have the largest populations and economies in the US
the northern part is barren desert infested with drug cartels
"I dont think annexing mexico would be worthwhile or we would have taken in it by now"
The thing is the US DID reach the heartland of Mexico and took over Mexico City thus ending the war. The US made an agreement to not continue if they were given the territories in the mexican cession
"dude this is the same stuff they said about california except for the drugs "oh no those dirty spanish people will make bad americans no please don't annex california"
There were many Americans living in California. California was mineral rich and was where the 1849 goldrush took place. Also California had a large fur trapping industry and had a large non desert coast
no profit to be made from the resources when you are spending trillions on managing defending enforcing law and matching Mexico to US standards |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|