rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:09 PM |
Introduction: Removal of none law enforcement, intelligence, and reconnaissance departments provided weapons. It’s a little frightening that regular departments, that don’t require weapons are provided military grade weapons or any other kind of weapon. This bill will stop the government from providing weapons to departments that don’t require them.
Argument: Isn’t it harsh to remove these teams’ weapons? They need some sort of protection.
Counter Argument: We shouldn’t have to reside in an environment so cruel and dangerous, that our main focus is protection. Even if protection is a concern that would be considered a member of the law enforcements responsibility? I mean they are suppose to “protect and serve” people around D.C and L.V. There’s certain agents/workers tasked with protecting and serving the people. Let these people do their job.
Introduction Section 1A: We need to start being realistic. Since when were members of these departments provided weapons by the government: White House Staff, Department of Transportation, Health and Human Services and more. Members of these departments don’t require weapons, and some of these members are unfit for the weapons provided. A lot of them have little or no training, and have no idea when to use their weapon.
Introduction Section 1B: Although this bill doesn’t only focus on White house staff, but it’s a common misconception that the White House Staff serves as a White House security force, they do not. The White House Staff consist of member of the Presidential staff, department advisors/directors, and members of the press. It’s not their job to secure or protect anyone or anything.
Section 1: Weapons will no longer be provided to departments that does not act as law enforcement, intelligence, investigative, or reconnaissance agencies. Departments that fall under one of those categories actually need their weapons, and it serves a purpose for them to have a provided weapon.
Section 2: Workers in a department that doesn’t work under a law enforcement, intelligence, investigative, or reconnaissance agency will still be allowed to carry a firearm if legal. It’s against the law to take away your weapons, and it’s just not right. Agents will be allowed to bear arms, this bill only states that they will not be provided a gun.
Conclusion: The purpose of this bill is to stop providing weapons to departments that doesn’t require the use of a firearm. We are providing weapons to workers just for their protection, and some of these weapons are too dangerous for just anyone to have. We need to start being realistic, and this is the first step. Also there’s no true reasoning behind why we provide weapons to departments, that don’t need them, other than protection.
Let’s stop living in fair, and lets start being fair!
*Note: This bill is not intended on limiting the rights of people in anyway. I created this bill not for revenge, but for equality. There’s no reason for certain departments to have a gun or a Taser. If they need protection so bad, they can buy a game pass, just like all the other citizens, who has a big issue with protection.
Signed Rodedawg
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:10 PM |
| This bill is written better than my last one, and it isn't just intended for one department. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:13 PM |
Please excuse some of my grammatical errors. Thanks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:13 PM |
no. never.
David G.C Attorney |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:14 PM |
| Yes, so people work hard to get a job and just work and work, no benifit in it at all, that's what your saying. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:18 PM |
| I don't like it. Why as a WHS member, cant I have a gun provided by the government? The SS sure isn't going to protect me. I have been attacked many times inside the WH and the weapon I had kept me alive. This is my opinion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:19 PM |
| This bill = terrorism is a-okay. (Keep going!) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:26 PM |
"I don't like it. Why as a WHS member, cant I have a gun provided by the government? The SS sure isn't going to protect me. I have been attacked many times inside the WH and the weapon I had kept me alive. This is my opinion."
Its illogical to provide guns to departments that don't need them. The only way you guys intend on using them is for protection. Here is my problem, regular citizen need protection ,if safety is such a big concern, and they feel that law enforcement isn't doing such a good job, but we aren't providing them any guns, they have to pay for them. The moral of this statement is why are we providing you guys guns just because y'all work for the government. We aren't providing regular citizens guns, and they fuel the government. I'm pushing for equality. Just because we are federal workers doesn't mean we should receive special items or special treatment. You feel as your tasked protectors aren't doing such a good job and they feel as their protectors aren't doing a good job, if thats the case why dont we supply everyone with guns.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:27 PM |
| People work for a job, they recive they're own protection. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:29 PM |
| We are living in fear. We rely on weapons to much. Lets stop being simple minded and stop thinking about everyone being a threat. We need to live in peace in order for us to have more fun in D.C or any other map. Lets stop murdering each other and learn to have peace and fun with each other. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:29 PM |
I agree, but I must ask why NGB was removed of the following: Police Motorbike Icer (Other weapons I forgot) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:30 PM |
Support Im all for takin weapons away from pigs :) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:36 PM |
| The developers thought those tools/vehicles should be removed, because they're unrealistic and often abused. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:37 PM |
| First off SS doesn't provide protection for me. Second off its not the governments job to provide all citizens with guns. That is the right for each citizens on there own. There is no equality when it comes to guns. This bill is one of the most ridiculous bills I have ever seen. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:39 PM |
| Call why do you feel that way? Is it because you are apart of WHS, and that's your only department, and if this bill is passed you will lose the weapons provided to you? If this bill is passed you can buy your gun just like every other citizen has to. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:43 PM |
| I feel this way because this is a crap bill. Not everything can always be equal. Also, I am in WHS and its my only department and I would loose my guns but I already have guns purchased. That's not why I don't like this bill. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synapsic
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1388 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:44 PM |
Rodedawg, criminals buy guns; we have guns provided for us. Until average citizens can't get illegal weapons from gun dealers for free, we need all the weapons we can get. Anyway, this oversteps Congressional boundaries since developers handle this, not Congress. All in all, I can tell you right now that the President won't sign this, I'm going to whip votes against this, the developers won't implement it, and your idea is bad to begin with.
Synapsic, White House Press Secretary Chief of Staff to the Attorney General Deputy Secretary of the Interior FBI Counter-Terrorism Division Delta Squad
~watch out for slithery slimy snakes~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:46 PM |
Signed, Theophilius.
Take those weapons from the abusive pigs, and shove them down their throat, and pull the trigger! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:46 PM |
| I can get developers consent. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:47 PM |
| Thank you syn. If this ever did pass, which it wont. I would advise the President not to sign it as well. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
rodedawg
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 659 |
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:50 PM |
| I am not trying to suppress you guys, because it would be limiting your rights, but I prefer the citizens responses, since they know how bad inequality is. In real life members of these departments don't recievee weapons, and I dont know whose idea it was to supply you guys with weapons. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:51 PM |
| if I were POTUS and if this ever passed congress (it won't btw!) I would veto this so fast lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Mar 2015 09:54 PM |
| @rode, in real life, WHS is surrounded by hundreds of secret service and a lot of fences. Also in real life they don't have fence hoopers coming in every other minute with a gun wanting to kill you. I have been killed many times by breachers. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|