|
| 15 Mar 2015 11:54 AM |
That life would have to be a created on a planet too...
The argument dies as fast as the dinosaurs. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 11:55 AM |
ya life didnt come from space we evolved from monkeys, which are on earth and earth is in space
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 11:58 AM |
| The panspermia hypothesis is that comets carrying water brought life to Earth. It is contrasted by abiogenesis which is that life developed from organic material on Earth. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:01 PM |
"ya life didnt come from space we evolved from monkeys, which are on earth and earth is in space"
that's not even what atheists are supposed to believe gosh is atheism just a cesspool of BS or what because this site really rubs it that way |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:01 PM |
| This could be contrasted by a mutual approach in which water which is integral to the formation of organic life on Earth was brought by comets. Life could have then developed on Earth later |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
MadSanity
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41506 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:06 PM |
"atheism just a cesspool of BS "
Why is atheism automatically tied with evolution?
As if people can't have a religion and believe in evolution? As if some atheists don't believe in evolution? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:09 PM |
in general here atheists have like 3 different ideas but that did seem like it was from an atheistic point of view, and if it wasn't, I'm wrong
regardless if you're an atheist and you think you evolved from monkeys you're completely and utterly wrong |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
wertymon1
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 469 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:12 PM |
anything is possible with God
EVEN EVOLUTION!1/1?!?!?1/1/?!?!?! win |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:13 PM |
im not even an atheist lol im an agnostic also >not what atheists are supposed to believe >implying that somebody cant be an evolutionary atheist |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:18 PM |
i wouldn't of cared if what you said made sense ill criticize someone as long as it means it had a use
what seems to be the most logical idea is that humans didn't evolve from apes "millions" of years ago they split of into 2 different species, then they evolved or what have you. so we have been the same species this whole time, but have gone through adaptation and natural selection, up until recently |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:23 PM |
I already explained this in the other thread about the subject.
Human and ape populations had common ancestors that evolved into separate species through a process of Allopatric speciation. The one population of common ancestors separated by migrating as two separate populations. Over time, genetic mutation and genetic drift contributed to the speciation of the two separate populations. Eventually they would have different enough DNA to be considered separate species. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:25 PM |
| *above* DANG U DID RESERCH! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:27 PM |
what vak said pretty much
not that i believe it but it's the most logical idea |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:29 PM |
| What I said was very rudimentary just to explain how it occurs. There are countless more variables and vast amounts of time that this process takes place over. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
diIpi
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1097 |
|
|
| 15 Mar 2015 12:31 PM |
| wait some people actually think that? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|