generic image
Processing...
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
  • Search in Players
  • Search in Games
  • Search in Catalog
  • Search in Groups
  • Search in Library
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • Games
  • Catalog
  • Develop
  • Robux
   
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
Home Search
 

Re: [UAF] Response to Synoan and Paul's Thread

Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:01 AM
This is a response to the following thread.
http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=157723418


Let me respond to a few things that my good opponents have listed on this thread.

1. Your claim about UAF's defensive capability is hogwash, at the very best, and demands that my clan caters to the demands of your clan when no official state of war exists between us. Furthermore, I will not ask my members to compromise their endeavors in the real world simply to fight a war with those who don't care about these endeavors.

2. If you do not have evidence to support a claim, then your claim is unsupported. That which is claimed without evidence may also be dismissed without evidence.

4. You're repeating precisely what you claimed in 1 and 2, both unclaimed and poorly considered accusations. The war was supposed to be a long war, which is why I accepted your proposal of 150 wins.

That's right, ladies and gentlemen. PAUL proposed the 150 raid limit to me. I decided to step down from my position from 200, and he from his position at 100, to meet me there. It is only through Synoan's meddling that Paul refuses to accept this term.

Supporting Chatlogs:
[23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): Meet me in the middle false.
[23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): 150 raid wins.
[23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): Thats all I'm offering.
[23:41] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): poaul
[23:41] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): no
[23:41] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): hes doing door in the face
[23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): THere are terms to 150
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): trying to make an unreasonable request so you meet middle
[23:42] [UAFCOM]FalseWarrior000 (falsewarrior): Hmm...let me consider it, Paul.
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): dont agree to 150
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): you're egtting played
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): by a psychology technique
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): google door in the face
[23:42] [UAFCOM]FalseWarrior000 (falsewarrior): I'll speak with Rodger quickly and try to get back to you within 20 minutes.
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): thats exactly what hes doing
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): false
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): 100 is the max
[23:42] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): we're not going over
[23:42] [UAFCOM]FalseWarrior000 (falsewarrior): Really? Paul's willing to negotiate, and I like that. I'll be back shortly, Paul.
[23:43] [RAA] Sasook (seclusive): paul isnt negotiating 150
[23:43] [UAFCOM]FalseWarrior000 (falsewarrior): [23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): Meet me in the middle false.
[23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): 150 raid wins.
[23:41] [SF COM] Paul321321 (paul321321): Thats all I'm offering.

Furthermore, any claims that I'm proposing a war of this length in the hopes of Sasook's clan dying are False. I haven't spoken personally with Isolaytor in the past 3-4 months, my HRs serve as my primary liaisons between him and I. Thus, any claim that I (FalseWarrior000) told Isolaytor (the leader of VOID) that which Synoan claims must patently be false. Furthermore, Synoan's willingness to make such claims reflects poorly on his credibility.

Chatlogs are available to those of you who have me on Steam.
Report Abuse
PIebeian is not online. PIebeian
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Total Posts: 6969
13 Mar 2015 12:03 AM
Well
200 wins is pretty much a giveaway to a ditf
Report Abuse
Preantepenultimate is not online. Preantepenultimate
Joined: 15 May 2012
Total Posts: 6539
13 Mar 2015 12:04 AM
hi false

do you remember me!

Bulwark of Topixa
Report Abuse
xSabreKillerx is not online. xSabreKillerx
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Total Posts: 6171
13 Mar 2015 12:05 AM
Okay so you're saying you can't defend sometimes cause your members have their "endeavors" but you want a longer war to 150?

Doesn't make sense
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:05 AM
Don't touch the purple snow. It's my snow.
Report Abuse
Preantepenultimate is not online. Preantepenultimate
Joined: 15 May 2012
Total Posts: 6539
13 Mar 2015 12:06 AM
my purple snow....

Bulwark of Topixa
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:07 AM
"Okay so you're saying you can't defend sometimes cause your members have their "endeavors" but you want a longer war to 150?

Doesn't make sense "

Please tell me where the logic is faulty, sir. I wanted a temporally longer war, not necessarily a single intense set of battles where the war ends before it's even started. The fact my members have things to do in the late evening doesn't seem to preclude this possibility.
Report Abuse
xSabreKillerx is not online. xSabreKillerx
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Total Posts: 6171
13 Mar 2015 12:08 AM
If you're too busy to defend then neither side will reach 150. It's tactics by you I get it.
Report Abuse
NightBladeFighter is not online. NightBladeFighter
Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Total Posts: 3798
13 Mar 2015 12:09 AM
might join uaf to kill raa
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:11 AM
The fact that a war can be fought over a long period of time says nothing about the intensity of the fighting. Battles will be fought daily, but you may not be winning 10-20 raids in a day. In fact, you may take several weeks to accrue the required number of victories if we account for raids and counterattacks.

If anything, my members' work simply affects your ability to raid at a specific time, not all the time. As per my motto, I will not ask my people to sacrifice their lives beyond ROBLOX simply to be omnipresent at PC. That's a ridiculous request on my part.
Report Abuse
NightBladeFighter is not online. NightBladeFighter
Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Total Posts: 3798
13 Mar 2015 12:17 AM
rekt
Report Abuse
paul321321 is not online. paul321321
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 12997
13 Mar 2015 12:18 AM
100 or nothing
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:22 AM
The door's behind you, Paul. Don't pick a fight you're not willing to finish.

1. I've worked to compromise for 150 victories, to the point I have actively attempted to convince Rodger of this point.

2. I will not be cowed into accepting your initial term. You will offer the terms of the compromise to Rodger and I (I'm still unsure of where he stands, but I know he wants a long war) or you will recede back from whence you came.

That is all, Paul. We've given so much in these negotiations as is, and I will not move any more.
Report Abuse
NightBladeFighter is not online. NightBladeFighter
Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Total Posts: 3798
13 Mar 2015 12:24 AM
rekt again
Report Abuse
paul321321 is not online. paul321321
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 12997
13 Mar 2015 12:26 AM
I'm not giving you 150 false and I'm not giving rodger an endurance war.
Report Abuse
eminemrocks93 is not online. eminemrocks93
Joined: 04 Nov 2011
Total Posts: 12992
13 Mar 2015 12:26 AM
False be wrecking them xd
Report Abuse
Scelus is not online. Scelus
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Total Posts: 3425
13 Mar 2015 12:30 AM
UAF can't even achieve one win without TGI.

How can they get 150?

False, you live under a rock then you decide to come out to post that if your silly and outrageous demands aren't met, you will probably do something unprofessional as a leader.
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:30 AM
Alright Paul. By virtue of your refusal to negotiate terms, I'm afraid I'll have to ask you to withdraw. I will not think any less of you for your refusal to fight, though your members might.
Report Abuse
paul321321 is not online. paul321321
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 12997
13 Mar 2015 12:31 AM
What your trying to negotiate I do not want nor will myself or synoan accept it, if you thnk I'm pulling out that is just you looking for an excuse, by you not standing by 100 victories you're the one trying to pull out because 100 victories is BY FAR a reasonable amount of victories for a war.
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:33 AM
You offered to meet me in the middle, Paul. I accepted your offer until it was rescinded at Synoan's behest. If anything, I'm offering you the terms that you initially proposed to me in this thread.

Check the chatlogs, sir. You brought up the idea of 150 wins, not I. I simply accepted it.
Report Abuse
Laedere is online. Laedere
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Total Posts: 23601
13 Mar 2015 12:33 AM
paul can't even begin to accomplish beating uaf like usf did smh
Report Abuse
GearsOfPower is not online. GearsOfPower
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Total Posts: 554
13 Mar 2015 12:34 AM
"UAF can't even achieve one win without TGI."

We've raided RAA three times in total. Two of those times we won, both of those times we either had more UAF than TGI or no TGI at all. Besides, I find it funny that you're complaining about receiving ally assistance in a 2v2 war..
Report Abuse
paul321321 is not online. paul321321
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 12997
13 Mar 2015 12:35 AM
8 - 1 Laedere


False, I was going to be polite and meet you in the middle but synoan does not want that and if he isn't comfortable with it I won't force it on my behalf. I see how 150 could be a long war with the current rate of UAF/TGI defending, I still feel that 100 is long enough but 150 would be even longer but its better than 200 or an endurance war.
Report Abuse
Falsewarrior000 is not online. Falsewarrior000
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Total Posts: 14507
13 Mar 2015 12:38 AM
Paul, Rodger isn't comfortable with anything but an endurance war from my discussions with him, yet I still try to convince him out of it. Similarly, you must convince Synoan that a war to 150 will be better for him and his clan. We will have no agreement if we cannot compromise.
Report Abuse
paul321321 is not online. paul321321
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Total Posts: 12997
13 Mar 2015 12:40 AM
False, 150 raid wins is just outright boring, raiding the SAME base for over a VERY long time is VERY boring especially when that clan can't even defend properly. I don't think that would suit RAA because after we beat you in this war they'll probably go back into hibernation because they are only active during war time or if they get raided. And rodger might want an endurance war but you don't, neither do I, neither does synoan which means 3v1 that idea is off the table and out of the window.
Report Abuse
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 1 of 1
 
 
ROBLOX Forum » Club Houses » Clans & Guilds
   
 
   
  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Parents
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy

©2017 Roblox Corporation. Roblox, the Roblox logo, Robux, Bloxy, and Powering Imagination are among our registered and unregistered trademarks in the U.S. and other countries.



Progress
Starting Roblox...
Connecting to Players...
R R

Roblox is now loading. Get ready to play!

R R

You're moments away from getting into the game!

Click here for help

Check Remember my choice and click Launch Application in the dialog box above to join games faster in the future!

Gameplay sponsored by:
Loading 0% - Starting game...
Get more with Builders Club! Join Builders Club
Choose Your Avatar
I have an account
generic image