|
| 23 Feb 2015 10:26 PM |
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TITLE.
1: This amendment may be cited as the "Judges Amendment"
SEC. 2. INACTIVITY.
1: Any Federal Judge who has not successfully completed a court case within any 30-day period shall be removed from their position as soon as the 30 day approaches. The judge shall be removed without impeachment. This amendment does not affect Supreme Court Justices!
SEC. 3. Employment
2: Congress shall get the power to appoint Judges, and the person appointed must be approved by the President of the United States or the Attorney General. First a person is recommended at either a Senate or House of Representatives session, they vote on it in one house, then it goes to the other for voting. If it passes both houses, it's sent to the President OR the Attorney General for approval. 3/4 of the House and Senate can override the veto. Depending if the person is sent to the President or AG, if one of them disapproves of the person, it cannot be sent to the other. Example: A person passes Congress to be a Judge and they send the person to the POTUS to sign off. If the POTUS Vetoes it, it CANNOT go to the AG for approval, as the person has been officially denied being a Judge.
Signed, HoR SmokedDeath |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
dans59
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8606 |
|
| |
|
|
| 23 Feb 2015 10:42 PM |
Let me explain one thing: the Department of Justice and the Judicial Branch are two distinct things.
Additionally, this wouldn't work, because sometimes cases aren't asked for. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
kach
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 412 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Feb 2015 01:15 PM |
this amendment would contradict currently standing amendments i'm not against the concept, but it's illegal :p
nay
rossb654mail || i'm right you know |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|