|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:16 PM |
It's pretty pathetic at how 6 Vaktovians defended off from 14 VOID/HIVE
- VOID knows the base more than VAK - VOID had stronger fighters than VAK in that server - VOID had the number advanatage
If number and skill can't beat 6 decent VAK gun fighters then...
YOU KNOW THAT LABS IS UNFAIR
LOOKS CAN BE DECEIVING
IT SEEMS FAIR IT LOOKS FAIR PEOPLE SAY ITS FAIR - BIAS
BUT IT REALLY ISNT!!!!!!
boom |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yeller
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5342 |
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:24 PM |
| The fact that such a large population of the C&G said labs was unfair way before this war occurred was saying something. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:25 PM |
It only proves that their base is overpowered, but to some extent.
==// The Noxian Emperor, Vaktovian Private | Join The Noxian Imperium |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:27 PM |
Two things,
1. The bomb health is scripted so that the less defenders there are, the lower the bomb health is so it can be easily destroyed. That's why flooding or pre flooding against VOID never works. So the "4v16" thingy doesn't count for crap.
2. We won at SMO II 5 times, i'm pretty sure if we sent some of VOID over to defend SMO II and let VAK raid it, our VOID would succeed in the defence. Does that mean we can blame them for having an OP base? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Killicide
|
  |
| Joined: 08 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 13715 |
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:29 PM |
"1. The bomb health is scripted so that the less defenders there are, the lower the bomb health is so it can be easily destroyed. That's why flooding or pre flooding against VOID never works. So the "4v16" thingy doesn't count for crap."
If you all couldn't get past 6 Vak defending your OWN BASE, what makes you think you'd have even the slightest chance if they had more Vak there? LOL. Your base is unfair get over yourself. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:30 PM |
| LOL, if you lose a raid at your own base then that is sad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:31 PM |
I never denied Labs was unfair but SMO isnt the fairest either so you're just biased if you just say Labs is unfair.
If it was up to me, I would add a terminal like VAK does but it's not |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:31 PM |
| Kill has a point. VOID is so butthurt right now lol, you guys are trying so hard to find BS and excuses to try and slide this xDD |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:32 PM |
| @Killicide, the amount of raids we won against 14 VAK with only 6 VOID tho... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:32 PM |
There is a LARGE LANDSLIDE BETWEEN THE FAIRNESS OF SMO AND LABS
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yeller
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5342 |
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:33 PM |
SMO is not a 100% fair base that is completely equal for both teams.
However, if VOID defended SMO 2.0 with 6-7 of them, and we even bumped the server size down to 20 so only 14 or so Vaktovians were on the raider team, the raider team would win. That's the difference of labs and SMO. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:34 PM |
They have more experience than us and we made more progress when we were raiding at the first day of war. /LXpRsgw
-Kakashi † |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:34 PM |
| SMO honestly isn't that bad. With decent teamwork it's not hard to win. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:34 PM |
Imagine if VAK used Labs and VOID used SMO
RIP VOID LOL
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:37 PM |
| Bump so that everyone is updated |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 09:39 PM |
"LOL, if you lose a raid at your own base then that is sad."
vak is sad confirmed |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Yeller
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5342 |
|
|
| 17 Feb 2015 10:18 PM |
Hmm. The idea of having the bomb health coorespond with the number of defenders isn't in itself a bad idea. However, when a single defender out of six or so can break through to pop a couple shots at the bomb alone and destroy it is a bit crazy.
Should VAK's terminal take longer to take over the more raiders there are than defenders? Or it could go the other way if we brought back the ability to win a defense at SMO. The fewer defenders, the quicker the terminal goes when we have it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|