|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:18 PM |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbmqymBOOAc i'd like to know how thx |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:20 PM |
| i mean seriously i couldn't even record that HD in 2012 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
randy295
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 26637 |
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:21 PM |
....magic? To be serious I dont even know |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:21 PM |
i never seen the beatles in that kind of definition now i've seen everything |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:23 PM |
>not even seeing the film rims >not identifying the white dots everywhere
its scanned film you donkey |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:24 PM |
">not even seeing the film rims >not identifying the white dots everywhere"
yeah but you can see so much detail and stuff
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:25 PM |
my point is the detail is amazing, it's just that the film is wore down after 50 years basically it would look crystal clear back in 1966 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:26 PM |
"yeah but you can see so much detail and stuff"
ITS SCANNED FILM |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:26 PM |
usually the camera quality for 1966 was this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcgZIz0Fd-w |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:27 PM |
"my point is the detail is amazing, it's just that the film is wore down after 50 years basically it would look crystal clear back in 1966"
>never heard of a process called restoring and digitizing
pls |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:27 PM |
| are you guys not giving it any credit for it's time period |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:28 PM |
"usually the camera quality for 1966 was this"
it was transferred to vhs
what would you expect for 240p from a tape |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:28 PM |
">never heard of a process called restoring and digitizing" looks like we have an angry little boy here trying to prove everyone wrong |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:29 PM |
"it was transferred to vhs what would you expect for 240p from a tape"
oooo so you're the expert on determining whether one is VHS or film? neat |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:29 PM |
"looks like we have an angry little boy here trying to prove everyone wrong"
looks like we have a casual person on our hands |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:30 PM |
"looks like we have a casual person on our hands" sorry i'm not a stuck-up jerk like you that has to be one step ahead of everyone else |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:30 PM |
"oooo so you're the expert on determining whether one is VHS or film? neat"
"oh no he proved his point so now im gonna switch to insults" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:31 PM |
| yeah it is pretty neat, but idk they probably used giant decent cameras, but when it's played back/live its poo poo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:31 PM |
""oh no he proved his point so now im gonna switch to insults"" lol i was asking you how the hell and where the hell you're coming up with how the films were VHS or film |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:31 PM |
"sorry i'm not a stuck-up jerk like you that has to be one step ahead of everyone else"
im just trying to prove my point |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:32 PM |
"lol i was asking you how the hell and where the hell you're coming up with how the films were VHS or film"
are you blind |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Jan 2015 10:32 PM |
i didn't expect some know-it-all 12 year old to try and correct me in the post like seriously get out |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|