Lexatus
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 6567 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:35 AM |
Would it spell the end of the Empire?
:) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Unreact
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2014 |
| Total Posts: 6153 |
|
| |
|
slasherx2
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6977 |
|
| |
|
Vaul
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10573 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:36 AM |
Probably. Although no doubt they'll continue on their edginess to another faction of the clan world.
Like a Gentleman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Lexatus
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 6567 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:37 AM |
Didn't they end the Coalition after they lost a war and made the Empire.
They also changed themes right? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jeen123
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1880 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:37 AM |
Some might leave. VAK would still be better than 99% of the clan world.
And we won't lose this war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lexatus
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 6567 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:39 AM |
Jeen, i remember when you and the rest of VAK/VAC said it'd be an easy war.
Your only 2 wins in front of EL/CAT and 3 wins infront in the conquest.
I think EL/CAT might pull of a full on invasion to get infront. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vaul
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10573 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:39 AM |
@jeen If you lose to CAT and EL, you just lost to a laughable group, and a group that revived just a month ago.
Basically meaning a whole lot of other groups would be able to crush you.
Like a Gentleman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
hubert637
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2448 |
|
| |
|
Deraktus
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1715 |
|
| |
|
warmakers
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 3264 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:41 AM |
@lex you're heavily mis-informed.
we have 8 wins on fear 8 wins on rsf and 11 on el |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:41 AM |
lol ya
i like donuts with the crust cut off |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lexatus
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 6567 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:42 AM |
According to EL and CAT it'ss 12-9 on conquest
and 10-8 vs EL/CAT
Going by 28/12 so... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dudeshark
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12534 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:46 AM |
the warscore is so outdated it's not even funny. And since EL's the only one that can scrap together wins
we're not fighting under their terms anymore. Idk why we ever did in the first place |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:48 AM |
| Technechal,y VaK has 30+ wins since they beat all conquest clans several times so yeah |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:49 AM |
"According to EL and CAT it'ss 12-9 on conquest"
yes, according to EL and CAT they are also saying a lot of other things which are all pretty much incorrect and heavily biased
they still refuse to show wins to prove they actually have that many |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:50 AM |
| not to mention this war would have been finished with if EL didn't decide to hold CAT's hand and close their base when we were 1 win away from getting EL out |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A680
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2014 |
| Total Posts: 4418 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:52 AM |
and VAK would have lost if you would have actually defended and not pick your servers
clan, you have lost this argument. get out
[ANDREW680 | A680] THE WHITE RANGER. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:55 AM |
"and VAK would have lost if you would have actually defended and not pick your servers"
Maybe if EL actually came to servers that were defended beforehand instead of ESRing then maybe you wouldn't be crying as much
oh wait, you would be..
We organise ourselves and not just dive head first and hope for the best. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A680
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2014 |
| Total Posts: 4418 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 11:58 AM |
do you even read what you say
you flood your servers like 17/30 and force raiders outnumbered the fact you blame EL for standing up to cheaptovia is incredibly dumb
[ANDREW680 | A680] THE WHITE RANGER. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 12:00 PM |
"you flood your servers like 17/30 and force raiders outnumbered the fact you blame EL for standing up to cheaptovia is incredibly dumb"
All the raids I've attended had EL in them before we arrived.
If we do rarely join a server without defenders, at least we don't pull an EL and start spamming the forums with "DEFEND YOUR SERVER!!" and "x is SO BAD!!!!!!" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A680
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2014 |
| Total Posts: 4418 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 12:01 PM |
then actually defend and then they won't spam the forums how dumb can you get seriously
[ANDREW680 | A680] THE WHITE RANGER. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
A680
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2014 |
| Total Posts: 4418 |
|
|
| 11 Jan 2015 12:04 PM |
"All the raids I've attended had EL in them before we arrived."
THIS also doesn't change the fact that VAK picks their servers and never defend the preflooded ones such as 21/30
[ANDREW680 | A680] THE WHITE RANGER. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|