|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:40 PM |
He left because the admin would not work.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:41 PM |
Meaning you banned him or...?
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:42 PM |
I attempted to reset his stats, however it would not work, so he left. I attempted to reset his stats because I had to kill him to prevent him from killing me, before the match started, while I was telling him the rules.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:44 PM |
-sigh-
this kid is an idiot i swear 2 god
>go to heavily edited RCL place with like dynamic lighting and fog and sht >>me: "ok lets go" I spawn, and my spawn is surrounded by invisible walls >>>Radec: "DONT START!!!!" (Even after we respawned on red and blue) >>>>Radec: ":kill weap" X8 >>>>>We finally start he says he won't reset stats
no sorry thats not rcl
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:46 PM |
and there were no rules to make, they were all agreed in PM
-Bricktops -No respawns after kill -RCL -no admin use
sort of broke all those rules tho |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:49 PM |
Wrong. There is nothing unfair about my RCL place. It is the same exact thing on both sides. The RCL place does not need to be unedited.
2. You can only go one way, straight. The right and left are blocked off, to make the path shorter.
3. Just because I teamed you, doesn't mean we start. It does not start until the countdown, which never took place.
4. I killed you multiple times due to you coming out, while I was attempting to establish the rules of the duel.
5. I never said I would not reset stats. My admin had a glitch issue.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:51 PM |
"and there were no rules to make, they were all agreed in PM
-Bricktops -No respawns after kill -RCL -no admin use
sort of broke all those rules tho"
I've never agreed to any of these rules. I've never said bricktops, or any of these rules.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:51 PM |
.....................
RCL isn't just about the weapons you know, it's also about the ACTUAL maps (Unedited maps)
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
VlLLAlN
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7552 |
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:54 PM |
-sigh-
you know what, you're not worth it.
If you're not going to fight at an actual, neutral sided where neither of us have admin RCL place, on an official map such as bricktops or narrowgil in which is unedited, we'll talk.
go back to your brickshooter ww2 group |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
VlLLAlN
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7552 |
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:54 PM |
you shouldn't over edit bricktops either
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:55 PM |
"RCL isn't just about the weapons you know, it's also about the ACTUAL maps (Unedited maps)"
Who ever said this? You are wrong. Other than the ambient, which made the place look sterile, the grass which you did not walk on, and the clouds near the center, nothing changed. I blocked off two passage ways to make the game shorter.
If you were good, you would RCL me in that map, no matter how different the map is.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:57 PM |
It was a heavily edited Bastion with:
-Blocked off sides -Fog -Dynamic lighting -weird mesh grass in the pit thing -recolored (Which I don't really care about) -Overuse of admin
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
VlLLAlN
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7552 |
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:58 PM |
Radec do not block off passages
thats editing it badly |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:58 PM |
"If you're not going to fight at an actual, neutral sided where neither of us have admin RCL place, on an official map such as bricktops or narrowgil in which is unedited, we'll talk." Any decent RCL player can fight on any map, as long as it is simple and fair, which mine is. You take the fact that it is edited as an excuse for not RCLing me.
"go back to your brickshooter ww2 group" Why do you even bother speaking of this, when BlazeIII and I defeating your argument so bad?
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:58 PM |
I'm not going to play by your rules...
my offer is the only thing that stands.
Fight at a fair, neutral place. Then we talk.
Neutral as in the place isn't owned by you.
tracking this thread btw lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
VlLLAlN
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 7552 |
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 10:59 PM |
Your ww2 group isnt too good
I was in it and I didn't really like it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:00 PM |
"Why do you even bother speaking of this, when BlazeIII and I defeating your argument so bad?"
all you did was spew fallacies and red herrings how does that defeat his argument |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:02 PM |
"-Blocked off sides" The sides were blocked off to make it so both people had only one path, making the game quicker.
"-Fog" There was minimal fog, which does not affect game-play in anyway.
"-Dynamic lighting" There is absolutely NO global lighting.
-"weird mesh grass in the pit thing" That is just a design. It does not affect gameplay at all.
"-recolored (Which I don't really care about)" If you don't care about it being recolored, then why post it.
"-Overuse of admin" I used admin to kill you, to restrain you from starting, before I say to start.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:03 PM |
"all you did was spew fallacies and red herrings how does that defeat his argument"
My comment was in reference to a different thread, not this one.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:06 PM |
"Your ww2 group isnt too good
I was in it and I didn't really like it"
Well, I'm not going to attempt to argue with that.
To Weaponization,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCP1mnQDwfM
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:07 PM |
yes i understand context thank you
clearly you dont because why would i respond regarding to that statement if i didn't understand the context of it lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:11 PM |
Due to you not understanding my point, I will try to rephrase it in more detailed terms, to aid your understanding.
>wep makes a thread, which consists of criticizations against German clans. >BlazeIII and I respond to him, ultimately defeating his argument. >He does not respond.
>He mocks Allemand. >I tell him that we've already proven his points wrong, in his other thread.
~Get Radekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Dec 2014 11:13 PM |
| why did you resort to redundancy even though i clearly pointed out i understood what was being referred to |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|