ywis
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 12931 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:11 AM |
Less people required for official raid, or less time.
VAK's way of saying thank you, presumeably. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mitsu1000
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1424 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:14 AM |
| So you want even more advantages? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:15 AM |
| Why would we say thank you to someone accepting our demand for war? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ywis
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 12931 |
|
| |
|
ywis
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 12931 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:15 AM |
| Same reason for saying fwerk you! For not accepting your war |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Skyman772
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9305 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:16 AM |
VAK giving their foes an advantage?
I want what you're on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ywis
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 12931 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:18 AM |
they gave nfc a fair advantage
its just an idea xd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:20 AM |
"they gave nfc a fair advantage
its just an idea xd"
Because they are a swords clan.
EL is a guns clan, so they should be capable of fighting properly at a gun fort. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mitsu1000
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1424 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:20 AM |
A fair advantage? Alright then we're not going to fight the 4 others and instead only fight you.
Is that fair enough? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ywis
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Aug 2014 |
| Total Posts: 12931 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:22 AM |
Mitzu I dont think you understand how the war declaration was clearly and nicely set up as
Did VAK make everyone think by fighting more than one clan, those clans can actually get a win? Yes
But can they actually do it? No, why? Cause its gunna be messyyyy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:24 AM |
Which is why those clans need to work together.
Come on, we're already giving you a big enough advantage by making it so we need to get 75 wins in total while the other 5 clans only need to get 50. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dudeshark
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12534 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:27 AM |
"other 5 clans" RSF and VS pulled out. the least you could do would be to let EL bring in two allies to replace them.
- Lord of the sea |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mitsu1000
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1424 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:28 AM |
It's not really our issue that you're not up to the task, I do understand the terms.
Either by time limit (and how much of the goal is achieved) or if one of the parties achieves 100% of the goal the war ends with a victor.
The goal is 50 combined wins of you 5, what the raid party is made out of isn't up to us but you (you can all send your best warriors or whatnot) and defensive victories don't count.
Against 15 wins on each of the 5 groups's forts. That means if you get 50 wins and we get 15 wins against el 15 against cat 15 against vs 15 against RSF but only 14 against FEAR it isn't a tie, you win even if we have more wins that you, without counting the defensive wins.
After we get done with a group and learned their base we have to adapt to a new one, while if you can find a strategy can works it's pretty easy to repeat it again and again since the base doesn't change.
@Dudeshark ""other 5 clans" RSF and VS pulled out."
And? You fail to realize that even if they pulled out we STILL have to beat them, not 15 times but 8. That still makes it more than you have to beat us, and they're still different bases. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mitsu1000
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1424 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:29 AM |
Besides the fact that... you know, you're 5 groups total, you have more members.
These kind of discussions are so entertaining. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dudeshark
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12534 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:30 AM |
mit, except they won't be helping us in raiding? If you guys are as good as you claim, you wouldn't mind 2 replacing them.
- Lord of the sea |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dudeshark
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12534 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:31 AM |
what ever though I know VAK isn't going to give any ground. They're those types of kids that has to win to have fun.
- Lord of the sea |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Enzo01234
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6131 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:32 AM |
2 EL allies to replace the two withdrawn groups sounds like a cool idea.
[-★-] Blue Shall Prevail |> www.roblox.com/My/Groups.aspx?gid=869728 ] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:35 AM |
"the least you could do would be to let EL bring in two allies to replace them. "
Last I was aware you didn't have many allies.
I'm checking now in the other tab as I post this.
You have RSF, who declined.. yet is still going to be hit. You have RO-Force, who is dead and inactive and you have Fleetcom, who I'm pretty sure is also a dead hype clan.
You don't have two allies to replace them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dudeshark
|
  |
| Joined: 06 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12534 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 08:38 AM |
clans, we've already been negotiating with many clans about alliances. I know of 2 very well respected clans have already agreed to allying. On top of that, RAA and SF would probably jump at the opportunity to war and we have close ties with both of them.
- Lord of the sea |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 09:46 AM |
| Yet we've already stated that you may not add any more allies than what was already there since the declaration was made. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SilentHD
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1409 |
|
|
| 14 Dec 2014 09:52 AM |
VAK > All
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)/69 -IGN |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|