|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:39 PM |
Greetings, clanspeople!
As of today, November 30th, Nightfall Clan hereby declares war upon Vortex Security.
NFC and VS officials have been talking about the war for quite some time now, but apparently there has been some ¨unfinished business¨ regarding VS and GG. Although I'm not exactly enthralled by the fact that the Green Gods are being prioritized over NFC and I, I will graciously allow some time between the two to finish whatever nonsense they're doing as necessary.
However, the war will begin on 4:00 PM EST, December the 14th, a Friday, which is a little earlier than the time when a VS official told me the GG-VS nonsense should be over. I will declare war regardless of whether or not the VS-GG shenanigans are over by that time. If VS finishes earlier, they may request to begin earlier as well.
In the unfortunate case that VS attempts to ¨decline¨ this war, please note that this war is not a proposal, but a declaration, and NFC will begin the war on its own accord regardless of the say of Vortex Security.
Here is the list of NFC's proposed war terms: - NFC hereby gives VS the privilege of how the war should end, but I have decided it should end in two ways: -- 1) Whichever clan reaches 10 officialized raid victories is the victor. -- 2) Whichever clan has the most raid victories by the end of the week (11:59 PM EST of December 21st, a week from December 14th). - NFC also provides VS the privilege of whether they would like allies involved in this war, as NFC does not care either way. - SENSIBLE and STANDARD fort rules apply. Preflooding is allowed, but no empty server raids (this won't matter for NFC since the raid begins upon respawn). - As soon as the war is officially begun, no changes are allowed to be made without the consent of both sides. - There are no autowins under any circumstances. - Raid wins must have image or video-based proof to be counted, and will be thoroughly analyzed. They should have all necessary information in them to prove that it was a valid raid.
Comparing Vulcan and Topixa and my proposed terms: - Vulcan gives defenders a substantial spawn distance advantage, easy to spawncamp raiders. Topixa's defender and raider spawns are almost equal, with defenders having perhaps a 5 stud advantage. - Vulcan requires 8/24 defenders, Topixa requires 7/25. - Being that Vulcan gives the defenders a substantial spawn distance advantage and has a slight edge in terms of numbers as compared to Topixa, I believe that lowering the gun damage and lowering the gate HP is very reasonable, and in fact no qualms have been raised against this when I brought it up, and one of the VS officials said that they would bring it up with imnotaguestimagirl.
I believe that these are all fair and sensible war terms, but if VS has any qualms with them, they may contact me via Skype or xfire. I am open to all reasonable negotiations.
Contact me via PM for more information and contact information (again, Skype/xfire). Hail NFC!
Signed, BelmontLegend255, Chancellor of NFC AustinLink, Second in Command Councilman |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Unreact
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2014 |
| Total Posts: 6153 |
|
| |
|
Vaul
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10573 |
|
| |
|
Gnaritas
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 1199 |
|
| |
|
Ashenn
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jul 2014 |
| Total Posts: 34 |
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:40 PM |
im dreaming right.
-ashenn- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
campy
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jan 2008 |
| Total Posts: 24127 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:41 PM |
| Even though it's VS they'd probably win |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:41 PM |
| I sent the thread link as soon as I posted it to Austin. No one shall get the first post besides Austin... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:42 PM |
grrr
I wanted tgi to war vs |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Unreact
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2014 |
| Total Posts: 6153 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:43 PM |
@glu; aren't you resalth? If so...
> you said X-101st would win in X-101st-NFC war NFC wins
> you claim VS superiority VS has yet to get a raid win on us and NFC has already won at Vulcan
your underestimation is tremendous |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
omada99
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 805 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Seviro
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 46758 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:48 PM |
@Instant
I'm giving that decision to VS. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:48 PM |
HOT DAMN
- give me ur sun - |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:48 PM |
What's VS? I thought they died in 2012? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:50 PM |
@TPHG
Trying to keep this war friendly (as friendly as wars can be, at least) hnnnng |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:51 PM |
| The only reason NFC beat X101 was because X101 didn't feel like raiding back |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:52 PM |
They raided back quite a few times, they just didn't get enough members to beat us at Virium
Albeit I as well as 90% of everyone hate Virium so there's that
We'll see the validity of your claims after the war :^) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Seviro
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 46758 |
|
|
| 30 Nov 2014 10:53 PM |
| i demand to know why your ¨decline¨ thing looks so weird |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|