|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:28 AM |
"you can't really decide which is better unless you want to talk opinions, or we can have a bit of rivalry and see which really is better :)?" what?
zap zap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:29 AM |
Oh God... I almost lost it seeing "EL" and "Good reputation" in the same sentence.
You must be confused, EL has NEVER had a good reputation, nor does it now. EL will continue to get worse because of the HRs. During my time as an EL Officer, there was so much arguing and fights, that we were constantly being threatened by the HC. Which of course, that didn't work, because the HC just pretend to get a hoot, but really don't give a rat's behind.
Zapirian, is probably the worst in there, followed by xMaleden, then coming lazyfirestar, and finally Kopris.
EL constantly gives free promotions and auto promotes favorites and ex-HRs to OiT+.
Example: RetiredColonel leaves and flames EL and it's HC. Two hours later, he rejoins and instantly gets his rank at Marshall back. Like what the crap. I can tell you if I rejoined I would have to start all the way from Recruit back up to where I was.
"EL's base is to OP."
Uh, yeah it is. Newsflash: EL can't win a defend without an OP base in their favor.
"EL would still be Green Gods." That is true... There is no arguing about that. Sorry Emp... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:31 AM |
| has anyone bothered to look at GG in the past few months |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:32 AM |
""EL's base is to OP."
Uh, yeah it is. Newsflash: EL can't win a defend without an OP base in their favor." Explain how it's unfair?
"EL constantly gives free promotions and auto promotes favorites and ex-HRs to OiT+. " Usually because they're actually good and they're the most useful in that position.
zap zap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:37 AM |
"How is it unfair?" Go look at it Zapirian. Use your eyes, I know you have some.
"Usually because they're active and good at that rank."
If they leave, then they should have to re-rank back up. Or else it just shows favorites. What you guys don't understand is, re promoting those people, are what makes you lose the most members. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:40 AM |
"Go look at it Zapirian. Use your eyes, I know you have some." You're the calling it unfair.
"If they leave, then they should have to re-rank back up. Or else it just shows favorites. What you guys don't understand is, re promoting those people, are what makes you lose the most members." They're good so we favorite them. It's practically in every clan and in life.
zap zap |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:42 AM |
| okay here is the thing, As far as I read here I think EL is bad... GG would surely beat them |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 09:58 AM |
| reputation where cant find it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 10:00 AM |
| EL officers always shout and complain... it's nonsense. They need to have some sort of health and wellness class. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iGrimmx
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2042 |
|
| |
|
xMaleden
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2542 |
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 10:08 AM |
| Fine then. New base release in a week. :^) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 10:10 AM |
| GG updated out fort before any raids took place at 12am before the war started, all we added was gamepasses and you claimed 20 war score, so we claimed 60 war score because of exploiters |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 10:12 AM |
| EL has something GG doesn't :^) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 10:12 AM |
they are bad
chicken nuggets |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 10:12 AM |
all of u judge EL about the past
judge it on today
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Nov 2014 11:07 PM |
Zapirian, you favorite them correct. So, therefore, there is no reason for other people to join that clan, right? Because they have no shot of becoming HR because the favorites are snobs.
"New base in about a week." Oh I've got to see this... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|