|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:26 PM |
//LIBRARY OF THE SUPREME COURT, SECTION 0004.//
//BAN ON THE PSCA//
-ARTICLE I-
In the recent days, Speaker rossb654mail was elected into office. And in the recent days as well, the PSCA has been attacking the NSA Director Poly. The PSCA KEYWORD(tried)KEYWORD Poly, and automatically found him guilty under the conduct of a bias quorum, and without Judicial officials to attend. First and foremost, I would like to remind the PSCA that the Legislative Branch CANNOT try high members in the Executive Branch. To the seventh graders in there, the Judicial Branch's job is to interpret the law. If a case were to happen, it would go through the Supreme Court.
-ARTICLE II-
Following this, Poly fired two of his Agents for being inactive. According to the Executive Rules, created by former President Zeyad567 (formally known as PowerofPersuation.) states that a High Ranking official of an Agency has complete control over the Agency and can fire and suspend at will for good and logical reasoning, I am pretty sure that inactivity files under this. Therefore, Congress had no right to conduct an investigation without the DoJ'S consent. Coup d' tat.
-ARTICLE 3-
In Poly's uttermost defense, he also has a witness side to this story. Before the PSCA took action against Poly, he crept into his DM'S via Skype and demanded that he goes to the Committee HQ or he will be fired. To cover it up, he blocked Poly and deleted the messages. Now let's back up and re-read that sentence. "Or you will be fired," sounds like a threat, right? It sounds as if Ross is commanding a firing squad. In my personal view, Ross likes to bend the constitution to his liking.
-ARTICLE 4-
When Poly fired the two agents for inactivity, he was attacked and "Tried" by the PSCA. The PSCA "jury" was bias, in favor of an NSA Agent who uttermost dislikes Poly. Now obviously, this will automatically end in a "Nay" to Poly. In the Judicial Branch, we have a saying that every decision is priceless. It just so happens that on a daily basis in Congress, the Senators and House members on persuaded to vote towards the High Rank's liking. This basically destroys the thinking behind the Congressional decision. And it is sad, because most of the time they do not know what they are voting on. Boo hoo.
-ARTICLE 5-
As you read in the title, you can know what this has come to. The PSCA will be banned due to it's Obstruction of Justice on the factual evidence that a secret "court case" was made to fire Poly. It will also be shut down for abuse of power and lack of warrants, because the Supreme Court and the Attorney General had no idea about this PSCA scandal. But hey, we all have some sort of dark side to ourselves. Isn't that right, Congress? The PSCA is hereby forbidden to meet in public or secret, or all members will be tried fairly for Violation of Conduct.
-ARTICLE 6- I made this Article knowing that Congress would cry and point out that "WE CAN'T DO THAT ABUSE CORRUPTION111!1!!!," so grab your journals, because I am about to take you to school. It is a common known fact in the United States that the Legislative Branch MAKES the laws, they do not interpret. Refer back to the article, and I personally put the summed up definition of the Judicial Branch in there. Congress is also obviously bias, and incapable of making their own decisions. So ask yourself, who really doesn't know law here? It is ironic how you slam the Supreme Court for being corrupt and power hungry, but take a look in the mirror sweetheart. This country is full of Liberals.
I bid you a good day, and a happy thanksgiving. Je me bats le diable dans sa propre maison.
--SIGNATURES-- -Supreme Court Justice Addy -Supreme Court Justice Thunderstarcat -Supreme Court Justice Sufferpoop -Supreme Court Justice Ryanrevan -Supreme Court Justice CoeJoetheGreat -Supreme Court Justice NTelsa [PENDING] -Chief Justice Rob3333 [PENDING.] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
phytt
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 151 |
|
| |
|
Screo
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Feb 2014 |
| Total Posts: 1329 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:29 PM |
| i'm not sure what happened but uh. OOOOOOOOOOOO ROASTED GET BURNT AAAAAAAA |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:29 PM |
well TECHNICALLY the Senate would try a member of the Executive branch, assuming the House passed articles of impeachment.
but ya |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:30 PM |
came up that's all me
no help that's all me
stay true that's all me
all me forreal |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:30 PM |
| i always hated ross anyway |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:31 PM |
@Faux,
Regardless, the DoJ must be there to represent and hold the case.
Even so, they have much against them on the other hand.
So yes, the Supreme Court shut it down. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jcmand
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3959 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:31 PM |
"I would like to remind the PSCA that the Legislative Branch CANNOT try high members in the Executive Branch. "
what yas they can
"It will also be shut down for abuse of power and lack of warrants, because the Supreme Court and the Attorney General had no idea about this PSCA scandal."
what does lack of warrants mean, they can issue warrants as legislative subpoenas
"According to the Executive Rules, created by former President Zeyad567 (formally known as PowerofPersuation.) states that a High Ranking official of an Agency has complete control over the Agency and can fire and suspend at will for good and logical reasoning, "
the same rules you rule unconstitutional?
rip haters |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:31 PM |
| well you and the four other supreme court justices who signed this document but yeah |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
soviet510
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2705 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:31 PM |
THANK YOU!
THEY ARE CORRUPTED AND THREATEND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO BE EXPELLED IF THEY DID NOT AGREE WITH PSCA!
Hence Funtoad?
Add this to your forum.
Soviet can I have a picture of the audit log please - PSCA wanna see something. 11/26/2014 10:06:54 AM by Psychodynamic
No warrant or message was sent to me... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iCjs
|
  |
| Joined: 21 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 474 |
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:33 PM |
"Regardless, the DoJ must be there to represent and hold the case."
um, no.
that trial would be held by the Senate and the Senate alone.
the DoJ has nothing to do with this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:34 PM |
Explain the bias jury members, and the Judicial Branch MUST be notified, it is in the constitution my friend.
I rest my case, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:34 PM |
| tl;dr all is saw was bias, ross, poly, idiot, liberal, masturb- i mean thanksgiving and more. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jcmand
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3959 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:35 PM |
sounds like u guys have no clue how committees function
rip haters |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:36 PM |
sounds as if congress doesn't know how to function well
read the constitution, and become an informed citizen. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:36 PM |
My entire hearing
Section A: http://youtu.be/HY6WFRdMeJg Section B: http://youtu.be/TcCeI4ykQoI Section C: http://youtu.be/1WGOi--AvTU
Please note that terrible comment Ross made towards me. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jcmand
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3959 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:37 PM |
ive checked it twice like santa
where does it say "when a committee holds a hearing, representativse from that department must be present"
no
rip haters |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
soviet510
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 2705 |
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:38 PM |
the legislative branch, silly.
if that were true, then congress would again remain all powerful over the doj.
"A court's authority to examine an executive or legislative act and to invalidate that act if it is contrary to constitutional principles." -judicial review |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jcmand
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 3959 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:39 PM |
ik they corrupt but what lets the sc do this
where does it invest in the sc this power
rip haters |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:40 PM |
| refer to both the malbury vs. Madison case, and the check's and balances chart. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2014 08:42 PM |
My entire hearing
Section A: http://youtu.be/HY6WFRdMeJg Section B: http://youtu.be/TcCeI4ykQoI Section C: http://youtu.be/1WGOi--AvTU
Please note that terrible comment Ross made towards me.
-POLY, VICTIM OF THE PSCA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|