|
| 24 Oct 2014 04:06 PM |
| our brain wouldn't be complex enough to understand it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Oct 2014 04:08 PM |
but our brain doesnt get simpler in your hypothetical statement it gets SMARTER to the point it can understand how it works not SIMPLER
{<~>the pessimist is always right<~>} add 9k to my post count my 2 prev accs were deleted |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Skeix
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2813 |
|
|
| 24 Oct 2014 04:09 PM |
| is it bad that I got lost on what you were saying while reading this |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Oct 2014 04:10 PM |
On the contrary, you could have a ton of memory and deditated wam
just loop the stuff over and over again so it's like 3 components * 400
you only gotta learn 3 things which loop 400 times.
get rekt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Oct 2014 04:12 PM |
@guest
if our brain was so simple, that us, our brain, could understand itself, our brain would be to simple to understand itself. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Oct 2014 04:13 PM |
u said if we were smart enough to understand our brain = an UPGRADE that implies the opposite if our brain got smart enough to understand itself it could.
{<~>the pessimist is always right<~>} add 9k to my post count my 2 prev accs were deleted |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|