Milnaria
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 7536 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2014 08:24 PM |
If the Native Americans shared everything they had with their tribe, and there land was for everyone in the tribe equally with no specific ownership. If they have only one class of people (No rich class, peasants etc) , who provide everything for each other then that makes them the only people who were pure communist and did not fall on their own terms.
>Right |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Milnaria
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 7536 |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2014 08:26 PM |
| yes i agree but it was wonderful for them, because they didnt have to try and get jobs, their only thing to do was to survive and be happy i guess |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Milnaria
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 7536 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2014 08:27 PM |
| Only job was to gather and hunt. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2014 08:29 PM |
| that is called primitive communism which is arguably distinguishable from the Marxist Vision. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Sep 2014 08:30 PM |
| yeah Karl Marx had a different view on it, and besides they were completely different, the natives thought it was a way to live, but Marx thought it was a way to have in the modern world |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Altair55
|
  |
| Joined: 28 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 36840 |
|
|
| 29 Sep 2014 08:31 PM |
| Tribalism != communism because A. there was no real economy or form of currency and B. they had inherited leaderships rather than Stalinist dictatorships or elections. You could argue that they're a monarchy or whatever you want but they didn't have an actual economy at all let alone a communist or capitalist one. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|