Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:10 AM |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcAZT7CtAfE
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fingggers
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 226 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:13 AM |
| Exactly. Iginla should have won his cup. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:21 AM |
Butt Hurt Calgary Fans. Its still debated on wither it was an illusion not. But it went to 7 in Tampa and you guys got destroyed by Tampa and only scored your one goal on a bad penalty by the ref on Pratt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVEKeDVAzr0
GG |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:21 AM |
''Butthurt calgary fans''
IM NOT EVEN A CALGARY FAN LOL |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:23 AM |
| In 2014, THE TEAM I ROOT FOR SWEPT YOU IN 4 GAMES |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fingggers
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 226 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:24 AM |
| the puck was clearly in the net, and it wasn't kicking motion, he skated towards the net and the puck went off his blade in to the net. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:24 AM |
| Yes because we had no good backup that season when bishop went down. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:28 AM |
Look at this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcAZT7CtAfE
They reviewed it so many times and they said "No Goal". Sure it looked like it went in and It probably did but they also looked for a "Kicking motion". They dropped the puck and that was the end of it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:30 AM |
Even if it did cross the line it would of never counted because it was kicked in. Its been 10 years since this so stop talking about it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:30 AM |
You sure about that dude ?
then explain me how that was a good goal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mmN5U6J8fU |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
| |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:33 AM |
| Because its the refs call. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:34 AM |
''because its the refs call''
are you dumb... ?
I hope you know the refs doesn't decide if its a Goal or No goal |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:35 AM |
You are basically trying to make a guess wither or not that player kicked it in or not. The Quality of the video in Tampa was not 100% conclusive. Honestly it would be interesting to get NHL refs to sit down and review that video and see whither they would of said Goal or No Goal. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
nomerdude
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 8202 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:38 AM |
why are people still talking about this it was clearly not in, the elevation of the puck caused a forced perspective.
if the 2004 cup didnt happen i probably wouldnt have gotten into hockey |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:48 AM |
it did go in
you can debate either it went in or not
but you can't say it was a fvcking kick in motion
because it wasnt at all |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
nomerdude
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 8202 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:49 AM |
was the final call no goal because it was a kicking motion? because it was clearly not in... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
nomerdude
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 8202 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:50 AM |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLav481BVEA |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 11:58 AM |
| The "phantom goal" wasn't in. They looked at it many times and even made an animated version of it and it never went in. It was an illusion. So everyone shut the fk up. The only people that believe that the goal went in are Calgary fans. Plus they also got a break in this game on the Pratt penalty. Clearly it should have been called on saprykin and they scored on it. Both teams got breaks. Tampa was the better team and deserved to win. So butthurt Calgary fans and people who don't like tampa bay sck my ass. There was no "phantom goal." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Aidsaids
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 19581 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 12:06 PM |
1. it did cross the line 2. it was kicked it
so no goal |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Armatura
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4551 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 12:14 PM |
again you can't say it was a kick in goal
when you review it you clearly see the guy didn't even know the puck was here
but if you look at this one, which was totally intentional, and still called a good goal, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mmN5U6J8fU
Why would the flames one be NG ? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 12:16 PM |
wasn't intentional kicking good goal flames win cup!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
nomerdude
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 8202 |
|
|
| 27 Sep 2014 12:19 PM |
it did not cross the line it was not kicked in
no goal.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|