|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:02 PM |
i say this because earlier today i looked outside the window at school and saw someone's car with a confederate flag on it even though the flag means a lot more than just the south lol.
DTLM |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:03 PM |
then i wouldn't be alive
because one of my ancestors was in the civil war.
and that would be the worst thing to ever happen to C&G
The rock of the forums.™ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SAPCenter
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 7889 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:03 PM |
| What do you mean nothing good? It would be a good thing, industry would boom and the south wouldn't be economically drained like it is today. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Adam335
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 21464 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:04 PM |
| >valuing economy over human rights |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:04 PM |
| Yeah If the south won I dont think we wouldve gotten any loans or the mass ammount of people in the country |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:05 PM |
SAP, Slavery would still be a thing. How would industry boom? We would've had to rebuild anyway which would leave much room for industry.
DTLM |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SAPCenter
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 7889 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:06 PM |
| Slavery would die out. Trust me, it would because it costs money to feed slaves and give shelter. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
1roy999
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5603 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:06 PM |
Dan please don't talk about the civil war.
Your stupidity in this subject hutys hurts.
The south was fighting to tie, or have a draw with the union - not beat them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:09 PM |
'Slavery would die out. Trust me, it would because it costs money to feed slaves and give shelter.'
it's not too bad actually i've got some huh workers here that work on the fields they made their shelter themselves and they also work on a garden so they produce the food themselves
you just dont know how to do it man
\\ Gameseater add 43k ish posts // |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:09 PM |
roy, the union didn't want to beat them either?
DTLM |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:11 PM |
Why fight a war if neither side is aiming to win.
"they watered us down so they forced to believe, that they won us through force and greed" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:11 PM |
| South wanted to be their own country. Abe wanted to keep the country together, and at first he didn't even care about slavery |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sparing
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4254 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:12 PM |
slavery would inevitably die out eventually - that's a tautology. if the south would have won, there's a good chance that we'd be better off in terms of economy and business. perhaps not at this point, but at least initially for awhile. and maybe our nation wouldn't have this horrible liberal framework that has hurt us through the ages. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mugged
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12775 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:12 PM |
| ...mississippi................................................... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SAPCenter
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 7889 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:13 PM |
| Abraham Lincoln was one of the worst presidents in history. He supported the burning of southern towns just because it was land on the CSA. Not only that, but he had this "brilliant" idea of sending blacks back to Africa. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
INFRING3
|
  |
| Joined: 30 May 2014 |
| Total Posts: 847 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:14 PM |
HEIL THE NORTH, You C**ts dun understand our power!
|You mortals are weak and misguided| |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:16 PM |
Sap, He didn't support slavery so he thought to send them to Africa so they could be their own people. it might sound dumb now but I guess it didn't back then.
DTLM |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yeller
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5342 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:16 PM |
"Slavery would die out. Trust me, it would because it costs money to feed slaves and give shelter."
The reason they had slaves was because they costed less than paying wage to workers... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mugged
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12775 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:17 PM |
yeller u remind me of some1 who goes to my school he looks a lot like u too
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SAPCenter
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 7889 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:17 PM |
| @Yeller, not really, the only people who had slaves were people who had money aka farmers. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:17 PM |
they fed slaves peanuts man thats taxing |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:18 PM |
Slavery existed long into the Victorian Era, that was just used for propaganda. It didn't truly stop until the 1960's, in fact it got worse.
If the South won, not much would be different from modern day, just maybe different rules, States would be more independent (Currencies, State Militaries, etc.), and that's about it.
Slavery still would've stopped, racism still would've stopped, etc., its just at that era most Countries still used slavery, including England, and the USA took it for propaganda. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:19 PM |
only ppl who didnt have slaves was the poor the south was more of an aristocracy the rich dominated |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Yeller
|
  |
| Joined: 16 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 5342 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:19 PM |
"Yeller, not really, the only people who had slaves were people who had money aka farmers."
Well yeah, because they grew large amounts of crops and purchasing slaves wasn't cheap. But to my knowledge they were good investments as long as they worked for a long life.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mugged
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 12775 |
|
|
| 22 Sep 2014 08:19 PM |
| word ur looking for is oligarchy nitro my love |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|