Bigtiop26
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 29887 |
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:10 PM |
"HEY LOOK EVERYONE, WE ADDED DECISIONS IN BLACK OPS 2" "OH THAT'S GREAT, THIS IS THE FIRST STEP TO THE SERIES GOING IN A GREAT DIRECTION" "HEY GUESS WHAT. NO MORE DECISIONS, BUT AT LEAST THERE'S FING FFFFFFFFFFFFISH" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:12 PM |
because infinity ward and sledgehammer can't make games that aren't boring just wait for treyarch's games every 3 years |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bigtiop26
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 29887 |
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:13 PM |
Okay so first rule of CoD:
Treyarch knows what they're doing. So we just have to wait until the game after AW to have something good? Black Ops 3? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:14 PM |
yes
or just play the newest cod is you have nothing else to do, other wise just wait 3 years |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Bigtiop26
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 29887 |
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:15 PM |
So in that way, CoD waits the normal length for making a sequel. What else did Treyarch make? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:17 PM |
world at war black ops 2 black ops 1 cod 3 which im pretty sure everyone hated |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
liam1127
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 6684 |
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:20 PM |
we're yet to see what sledgehammer can really do
they only worked on MW3's campaign iirc so there's really not much for them to work with there. Hopefully all of the interesting campaign dynamics of BO2 will come back. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:22 PM |
yeah but by judging by the looks of advanced warfare the colors are going to be boring and grey/dark white also they will have bad delay and you'll die fast like in every infinity ward game as long as it's better than ghosts ill be happy
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:24 PM |
Advanced Warfare looks okay, but theres literally no color in it.
They did fantastic with black ops 2, its almost to the point where i can call it a masterpiece of a game. Then Ghosts happened. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WikiThis
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2013 |
| Total Posts: 20357 |
|
|
| 03 Aug 2014 07:50 PM |
Treyarch is my favorite of the COD developers (for now) Though they could do better on the Spiderman Games. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 05:10 AM |
I'm the reverse, but i never touched ghosts (Or black ops 2) so that'll probaly be why. I prefered the modern warfares over black ops 1 for some reason. I quite liked 3, as it was actually pretty good, and didn't just go "MURICAN, BRIT, MURICAN, RUSSIAN etc." Wish they'd make a new WW2 game :L.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
liam1127
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 6684 |
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 06:30 AM |
"MURICAN, BRIT, MURICAN, RUSSIAN etc."
Yeah but...it sort of did exactly that, with the locations
in the trailers they stylised it as AM3RICA, 3NGLAND, FRANC3, G3RMANY
I know that's not exactly what you meant. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 06:41 AM |
Nnonon. I meant Call of Duty 3, about that point Alot of WW2 games simply seem to go "YOUR AMERICAN" "NOW YOUR BRITSH" "NOW YOUR RUSSIAN" Call of Duty 3 actually had player characters as Canadian Infantrymen, and Polish tankers. It made a refreashing change from "Yeah, the allies were pretty much Britan, America and Russia."
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 07:13 AM |
| They actually didn't even get a say in the making of MW3s campaign as they had already written the script and started the game a little. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 07:15 AM |
oh and as for the new one. It's gooing to be in a lot of different countires as it's not a military. They can go where they please.. :l
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 08:04 AM |
| The decisions did absolutely nothing, pretty much everything was the exact same thing except the end. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kpersfan
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5083 |
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 08:33 AM |
| The fish AI was horrible anyway. They swim through walls. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bigtiop26
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 29887 |
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 09:53 AM |
"oh and as for the new one. It's gooing to be in a lot of different countires as it's not a military. They can go where they please.. :l"
So they're Outer Heaven?
@tested
It's the thought that counts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 09:53 AM |
@testel
What are you talking about, each decision changed the whole storyline and how it played. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 09:59 AM |
| If each decision changed the story significantly at all there would be different missions when you made a different decision, instead it just slightly changed how the cuscenes played out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bigtiop26
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 29887 |
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 10:01 AM |
| Better than no decisions at all, at least. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 10:05 AM |
The choice affected each outcome and playing field, from 1980s, to 2025, and yes the choices did affect missions.
Ex. (spoilers) in one mission your in Afghanistan 2025, and you have a choice to shoot your friend or the enemy, if you shoot your friend, thats over and menendez is captured, if you try shooting menendez, you fail, somehow grabs your gun, and shoots you.
You then switch to another character and go down to this firefight to capture menendez. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 10:10 AM |
But no games is without its flaws and its COD so you have the cliche pieces.
But some of it was just freaking ridiculous that i actuallly laughed at. Your on a horse fokin dodging artilley shells, foking mortar fire and fokin tanks and freaking bullet fire |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bigtiop26
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 29887 |
|
|
| 04 Aug 2014 10:15 AM |
I don't get it. Is it because horses are inherently funny? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|