|
| 22 Jul 2014 08:13 PM |
I'm tired of defending AI, We wont win when they have 17-5. We can try our best to hold 1 term, But then 5 or 6 come and take it!! We either need more ACTIVE members or a new fort we have advantages too. -I would suggest Arvore II or Arvore, With new tech or revamped. -The 3 term idea was good, But when you have 17 Raiders, and 5 RSF, That idea would fail! That's why 1 term would be good.
-Make RSF have some advantages, Like spawn closer to term, Tell me what fort that don't have their at advantages! -When we had Arvore II, It was fair, WE both spawned close, no spawn killing. It was amazing!!
-Arvore was the same way, Fair and if gate was closed 1 way in sword jumping!! Was a good fort, Needs revamped but good.
-Now, We need more ACTIVE members, when we only have a couple people at raids is not very good. When we raid we need a mass server raid or even when we defend, its always good to have a ACTIVE group. Half of our recruits either have quit Rolox or quit clans.
Just defending AI is point less, It may make our skill better but really, We need a new fort bad.
Some people may not like my idea's but they are good. I will still defend, because a true soldiers never gives up! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 08:16 PM |
preach to the choir. preach to the choir. amen!
[iplayhard] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DanSkillz
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 67 |
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 08:30 PM |
Wow, best idea I've heard since AI was created. I think the best one and more updated one is Arvore II.
#ArvoreIIForMain |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 08:31 PM |
| Or you can update your base after you lose. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DanSkillz
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 67 |
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 08:33 PM |
We already did that but it's the same shet. sorry for bad word. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
truefire2
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5330 |
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 09:28 PM |
| Sword jumping doesn't work with new anims I think. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:09 PM |
| Well, If we fix AI, We would run into more and MORE problems. SO NO. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:09 PM |
| Wish I could delete posts and ban people for form... Haha #Roblox |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:15 PM |
| If we were to change our fort and improve it to make it a decent fort to raid and defend, we would have to postpone the war yet again, for a longer period of time. Many people overexaggerate the changes that have to be made to AI. Though, I agree that it is far too easy to gain a victory there. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:16 PM |
"no spawn killing. It was amazing!!"
but if you spawn camped, you won
llamas ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Statfire
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5119 |
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:18 PM |
-I would suggest Arvore II or Arvore, With new tech or revamped.
hail |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:21 PM |
| N0va, But the thing is, If you went in a group and rushed. You would SHERKT everyone out there. So spawn camping isn't a big deal.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:22 PM |
| True, Well we could make an obey in then, or something |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
scorch775
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 14 |
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:39 PM |
| I agree with Cam, we need a new fort severely... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 10:43 PM |
| My main issue with Arvore and Arvore II is that there is only one way to get to the terminal island, which is the bridge. This doesn't solve the issue of it being too easy for raiders to win. As I said, making major changes to either of these forts would result in an extended war postponement, which we are trying to avoid. It would be far more efficient to just make changes to AI. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 11:06 PM |
| Gege, You don't get it. We did change AI. Then we ran into the bug with guns.... Arvore II Is a good fort because the bridge!! Because its harder to get to term if people are shooting you in the back. Plus, Once they get to the end of the bridge they have to stack to get over and open the gate. Which getting shot at is not good while stacking.. :( Now, Arvore I, Since you cant sword jump any more ( I think) We would have to think of a second way to get in. ( If gate was closed). Well, The war will be lost if we don't get more members active or a better fort. So a postponement would not be bad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 11:14 PM |
| You make it sound like it's logical to give up on a fort due to a gun script breaking, when it can easily be fixed. Our main issue is the lack of attendees at training, having only the bridge makes it extremely difficult when outnumbered or when camped which I can assure you, will happen at every single defense. That'll allow UAF to rack up on wins once again. Our defenses are the biggest issue since the only times we have lost were when outnumbered or if someone presses the red button. We've won many defenses as well, so what needs to be done is have some changes be made to AI to fix the guns and make it harder for raiders to win. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jul 2014 11:46 PM |
| RSF Fort is a great fort, you guys are just too inactive and now you want a fort thats op so you can win 3v20 If RSF was to get better guns and such It would be alot funner to raid/defend. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ranith78
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 112 |
|
|
| 23 Jul 2014 01:14 AM |
| um ok but lets keep it fair for both sides |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2014 06:26 AM |
| This post is not all about the gun scripts braking!! Lol, It is logic, You need to know how to make a base before you can do it!! What does attendance have to do anything about trainings, Who cares about trainings, WE need people at AI defending. But wait Half of us are INACTIVE. The only way to defend AI is to get better guns and win in numbers. ( Not happening anytime soon) That's why Arvore II or Arvore would be good. Just put the 1 term in their and new guns and BAM There is a raiding for that WE have ADVATAGES TOO. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2014 06:28 AM |
| Beast, We don't want a OP fort, WE want a fort that we both have advantages too. Right now, If we don't win in numbers then already win for raiders.... Because you can have 6 people go to 1 term and guard it! If we have 4 members on AI we can only hold 2 terms at the most! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2014 06:33 AM |
The only way to defend AI is to get better guns and win in numbers. ( Not happening anytime soon) That's why Arvore II or Arvore would be good. Just put the 1 term in their and new guns and BAM There is a raiding for that WE have ADVATAGES TOO.
Besides the Revolver, the rest of the guns are fine to keep once fixed. You don't need to win in numbers at AI if you have skill and use strategy. If anything Arvore I and II takes more difficulty to defend since once they capture the bridge, you're screwed. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2014 06:36 AM |
| (ignore the first part of my last post, I was using it as reference since I couldn't see what you had posted) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Reggected
|
  |
| Joined: 03 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1434 |
|
|
| 23 Jul 2014 06:57 AM |
The reason the guns/gun scripts are breaking is because of the team change GUI. We need True, Pie or Gig to revamp this one script (Team switch GUI) And the problem with our guns breaking, will be over, hopefully...
[RSF] Pirate Reggected |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|