|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:04 PM |
| the NHL final didn't have the same old tired storylines of the NBA final |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:05 PM |
| I prefer the NHL Final, too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:05 PM |
| But the Stanley Cup Final is probably going to end up in a 4-0 sweep while the NBA Finals is gonna go to 7 games? Which seems more exciting? IDK THE SWEEP!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:06 PM |
| Sir, you say that because San Antonio is in the Final, but that's fine. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:07 PM |
the NHL had a better quality of play than the NBA. games 1 and 2 went to OT (game 2 double OT), game four is a close one, and who even knows. it could go to seven
the NBA has been blowout, grinder game, blowout. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:07 PM |
"Sir, you say that because San Antonio is in the Final, but that's fine."
...but you're wearing a Kings jersey |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:07 PM |
| anyone who says the NHL final isn't close hasn't been watching the games |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:08 PM |
| I am more into NHL b/c one of my teams are in, your NBA team is in. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:09 PM |
"anyone who says the NHL final isn't close hasn't been watching the games"
Just because two or three games in a whole series that goes to 7 are blowouts, doesn't mean the series is boring. Championships in both leagues aren't won by one game, they're won by a series. The more games it takes to win, the better. Plain and simple. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:10 PM |
NHL>NBA for sure, its stupid that the finals again are Spurs vs Heat.
"Why are you asking, you a cowp or something?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:11 PM |
"doesn't mean the series is boring."
the series is boring. it is nowhere near the quality of last year's NBA final
"The more games it takes to win, the better. Plain and simple."
where did you get this hot nugget of logic from
teams can play a sloppy seven games and then one of them ends up with the championship on what appears to be complete accident |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sillkin
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 224 |
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:12 PM |
"NHL>NBA for sure, its stupid that the finals again are Spurs vs Heat."
It's stupid to see Miami in the Finals for the fourth year in a row, San Antonio has't won another championship in 7 years.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:12 PM |
| lakers-celtics in 2010 went to seven games and was not an entertaining series |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:13 PM |
| also lol sir hurricane doesn't understand what a storyline is |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:13 PM |
"It's stupid to see Miami in the Finals for the fourth year in a row, San Antonio has't won another championship in 7 years."
That wasn't my point, how about you come back at me with another argument?
"Why are you asking, you a cowp or something?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:14 PM |
| also why are you so confident the finals are going to go to seven games? the spurs have been blowing out the heat |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:15 PM |
"the series is boring. it is nowhere near the quality of last year's NBA final" I can tell you haven't been watching any NBA Finals games either.
"where did you get this hot nugget of logic from teams can play a sloppy seven games and then one of them ends up with the championship on what appears to be complete accident" It still takes 7 games, which means the losing team put up a fight.
"lakers-celtics in 2010 went to seven games and was not an entertaining series" Are you joking? That was probably when I became HOOKED on the NBA. Before, I was just into Spurs games. THAT series got me into the entire NBA picture. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:16 PM |
"also why are you so confident the finals are going to go to seven games? the spurs have been blowing out the heat"
Any Spurs fan is still nervous until the outcome of Game 4. If we win Game 4, then we can lay back because we won, but if Miami wins Game 4, we ALL know it's going to 7. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sillkin
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 224 |
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:17 PM |
"That wasn't my point, how about you come back at me with another argument?"
You're saying seeing a Finals rematch is stupid, while I'm saying Miami getting to the Finals 4x consecutively is stupid in boring.
This is the first rematch since the 1998 NBA Finals (Bulls vs. Jazz) NBA Finals rematch aren't really common.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:18 PM |
"I can tell you haven't been watching any NBA Finals games either."
uhhhhhhhhhhh i have. it's been blowout, grind, blowout
"It still takes 7 games, which means the losing team put up a fight."
lol
"Are you joking? That was probably when I became HOOKED on the NBA. Before, I was just into Spurs games. THAT series got me into the entire NBA picture."
here comes sir hurricane with his contradictory experience, trying to say that a series where both teams struggled to get above 80 points per game was a good one
"If we win Game 4, then we can lay back because we won, but if Miami wins Game 4, we ALL know it's going to 7. "
lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:20 PM |
"You're saying seeing a Finals rematch is stupid, while I'm saying Miami getting to the Finals 4x consecutively is stupid in boring.
This is the first rematch since the 1998 NBA Finals (Bulls vs. Jazz) NBA Finals rematch aren't really common."
a finals rematch is stupid, plus ontop of that miami has been there 4 times straight proving my point even more. the NHL finals is 10x better right now
"Why are you asking, you a cowp or something?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:21 PM |
"uhhhhhhhhhhh i have. it's been blowout, grind, blowout" Game 2 wasn't really a grind until the late 3rd quarter and mid-to-late 4th quarter. Spurs were dominating first half.
"here comes sir hurricane with his contradictory experience, trying to say that a series where both teams struggled to get above 80 points per game was a good one" Defense was all over in that series. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:21 PM |
finals rematch = same stories, same players
"Why are you asking, you a cowp or something?" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2014 09:22 PM |
"Game 2 wasn't really a grind until the late 3rd quarter and mid-to-late 4th quarter. Spurs were dominating first half."
so when the game counted, it was plain grinding
okay nope you are not proving anything
"Defense was all over in that series."
time for more excuses as to why the most hyped series ended up to be boring basketball |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|