JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 12:17 PM |
AMD Athlon X4 750K Processor: http://amzn.to/16BboCC
MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 Motherboard: http://amzn.to/18gKQx8
XFX Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition Graphics Card: http://amzn.to/139Kfc6
4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 RAM: http://amzn.to/15EjmOe
500GB Western Digital Caviar Blue Hard Drive: http://amzn.to/1bytfj5
NZXT Source 210 Case: http://amzn.to/13ZbiIR
430W Corsair CX430 Power Supply: http://amzn.to/18UZKsr |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 12:20 PM |
| Also, Windows 7 or 8. Think this build can run dayz on medium graphics? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2014 12:31 PM |
no
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOIRNVlw84Y |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fdfxd
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18382 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 12:38 PM |
| I lol'd when I saw athlon. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 12:49 PM |
"No what, any suggestions" Unless you're on a tight budget, I strongly suggest that you replace the CPU and PSU And getting a R7 260/X or Radeon HD 7790 would fair better than getting a 7770.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
fdfxd
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18382 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 01:08 PM |
| Chev is correct,Athlon is horrible. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 01:24 PM |
| Alright I'm new to this stuff, sorry, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 01:33 PM |
| What should I get instead of the Athlon |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2014 01:41 PM |
athlon is for budget how much money do u got left what games do you want to play |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fdfxd
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18382 |
|
| |
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 01:47 PM |
| My budget is 800 but I'm willing to spend more. I can add about 150 dollars to it, I wanna be able to play dayz. Pretty much the only game I want. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2014 01:47 PM |
tbh fx isn't much to brag about either google "gaming CPU hierarchy chart" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
fdfxd
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18382 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:07 PM |
| Then AMD FX 6310 is good for you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:07 PM |
oh its 800 lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiml6FxkWHo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lh_dGts6TeQ i like this guy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:17 PM |
| if you base it on the 800$ one you might wanna tone down the cpu a bit and put that $$ towards a gpu |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:18 PM |
| That's where I got it from |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
JoBruin
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5092 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:26 PM |
| gtx 660 is about 200$ should run anything on medium |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
fdfxd
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 18382 |
|
| |
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:49 PM |
Differences What are the advantages of each
Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 980 MHz Around 5% higher clock speed Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 1,032 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed Lower TDP 55W vs 140W 2.5x lower TDP Front view of GeForce GTX 660 Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory Better passmark score 4,119 vs 3,307 Around 25% better passmark score Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed Higher memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth Higher texture rate 78.4 GTexel/s vs 32.6 GTexel/s Around 2.5x higher texture rate Better floating-point performance 1,882 GFLOPS vs 1,044 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance More texture mapping units 80 vs 32 48 more texture mapping units More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors More shading units 960 vs 512 448 more shading units Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed Better passmark direct compute score 1,936 vs 1,354 Around 45% better passmark direct compute score Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus More SMX units 5 vs 3 2 more SMX units
oh yeah that's better alright |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 May 2014 02:51 PM |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
The GTX 750 Ti has a 40 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 660, but the GeForce GTX 660 has 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GeForce GTX 660 exhibits a 37.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 750 Ti has a 40 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 660, but the GeForce GTX 660 has 8 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GeForce GTX 660 exhibits a 7.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 750 Ti was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 660, and so the GTX 750 Ti is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games.
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti and the GeForce GTX 660 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The GeForce GTX 660 has 57.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 660 is much better than the GTX 750 Ti.
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 660 has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 864. The GeForce GTX 660 having 96 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 660 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750 Ti.
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti requires 60 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 660 requires 140 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GeForce GTX 660. The GeForce GTX 660 requires 80 Watts more than the GTX 750 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 660 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750 Ti.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|