entanks
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1290 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:44 PM |
As I apparently just found out, the Soviet Union still would of won (I believe this, they really are some tough mother f'ers). However, not being as "kind" as the US, they would of taken control of most of Europe, and communism would have spread all around Europe.
Creating a very different Cold War... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:45 PM |
do remember that a huge portion of russian equipment was american-produced yay lend-lease |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:45 PM |
no
hatlar split his army
he would have sent more to fend them off. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:45 PM |
| do remember that a huge portion of russian equipment was american-produced [2] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:47 PM |
@genrals;
yes, 95,000 T-34s were made in Detriot.
and 43,000 IL-2 were made in Texas. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
entanks
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1290 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:47 PM |
| @robloxrock3, Well, I don't think it would of mattered, the Russian winters themselves could kill thousands of Germans. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
EricRoach
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 11658 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:48 PM |
| japan would've flanked russia, and not just through the east side, they'd capture all of china, and then move onto the now russian satellites, eventually cutting russia from contact, and beginning a slow movement to the capital. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:48 PM |
"yes, 95,000 T-34s were made in Detriot."
funny because 60,000 T-34s were produced, max
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:49 PM |
| soz, i was looking at stats for T-54/55. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:50 PM |
no T-34s were made in the USA
USA supplies made up 1/10 of Russian wartime needs |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Acusiont
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 33414 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:50 PM |
>soviet union was rekting germany on the eastern front at the same time britain, canada, us, etc. were rekting germany on the western front >if it was just the soviet union on the eastern front, germany's troops would not have had to have been so spread out >could have focused troops in eastern front to battle soviet union >soviet union still wouldve managed to push through >capture berlin >raze berlin to ground >scream "FOR MOTHER RUSSIA1111" >take over rest of germany before britain liberates france >soviet union continues into france, "liberating" it but actually taking it over >france is now communist >soviet union continues its spreading of communism into italy >no marshall plan >no truman doctrine >communism takes over europe >actually a formidable foe to US >US is part of the 3% of the world to be capitalist today |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:53 PM |
| I think that Germany would have conquered Great Britain like they did France, and then move all their troops to the Eastern front to fight the Soviet Union. I don't know how Germany would have fared against the Soviet Union, however, because the Russians could not even feed themselves. If Germany invaded they would face harsh winters they were ill equipped for. Russia also practiced a scorched-earth policy burning cities to the ground as they retreated to prevent the Germans from acquiring resources to sustain their military efforts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
relivable
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Apr 2014 |
| Total Posts: 907 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:54 PM |
| I'm Russian so hail communism! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:54 PM |
"Russians couldn't feed themselves."
now, you do notice that 1/2 of russia is ice, another 1/3 is bad, but the remaining land ( ALOOOOOOOT) is arable. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:55 PM |
| Stalin practiced forced industrialization. He took grain from the peasants and sold it to improve his economy. This led to the largest man made famine ever. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:56 PM |
| Germany had already attacked Russia breaking their treaty and taking them by surprise. He could of finished them off easily. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2BaNeZ
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 15115 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:57 PM |
Soviets switched sides in the middle.
I'm dirty dan!
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Acusiont
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 33414 |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:58 PM |
"He could of finished them off easily."
maybe if germany's forces weren't divided |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 27 May 2014 08:58 PM |
"Soviets switched sides in the middle."
Soviets were not involved into 1941, and they were only in a NEUTRALITY pact. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|