|
| 22 May 2014 05:05 AM |
1. Ability to delete comments on own content. i.e. Places, Models, etc. 2. Dynamic Lighting casting shadows from players and bricks and not showing lights through thin walls. 3. Add camera style for in-game experience under place options. i.e. Basic Settings > Camera Format > List: Classic, First Person Locked, Mouselock locked, First Person Disabled, etc. 4. Group name change -- 1.5k - 2k 5. Price floor reduce to 5 robux/50 tix 6. Sparkle time gears. Oh yeah I went there. 7. Add a new BC called UBC -- Ultimate Builders Club -- 100 robux daily/$30 a month 8. Allow future updates to be enabled/disabled from an in-game script, i.e. the anim update that was removed could have been removed manually with something along the lines but perhaps not exact: game.AnimSettings:RevertCoreAnims(true/false)
Feel free to add more suggestions onto this. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:11 AM |
| 9. The new bug that adds a ton of brightness to an avatar picture. Remove it (implying it even is a bug) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DataStore
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8540 |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:12 AM |
1) No. Scammers, or other mischievous people, would delete negative comments from the place. Whilst the voting system is available, some people will check the comments and may go into the place, since they may see the current rating as unfair.
2) There's an option, in the properties for dynamic lighting, that does this.
3) I don't see a need for this? Is there not already a way to select your camera mode?
4) No, not at the moment. As I've said, on many threads suggesting this, there are several issues ROBLOX needs to address, primarily the social impact of such a feature. Aka, join a group called "Elite SFers", unbeknownst to you it changes to "Cry Baby" - you're now embarassed and bullied.
5) No. It has already been reduced twice, I believe, and doesn't require any further reduction.
6) No.
7) No. OBC is the last BC they are introducing, with it starting to migrate to more of a BC for developers. They, the people who run ROBLOX, have already stated it's the last BC aswell.
8) No. The more options you give people, to undo updates, the more people will whine for options for all of the main updates. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:14 AM |
| Well jee you're full of negativity now aren't you? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DataStore
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8540 |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:15 AM |
| No, I'm not full of negativity. These are simply my opinions on why they shouldn't be added, aswell as giving evidence where evidence is required. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:20 AM |
1) supplied evidence
2) there isn't, :(
3) no evidence, just questions.
4) supplied evidence
5) made a valid point
6) just said no
7) ok cool
8) the more you don't let them the more then will whine. :) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DataStore
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8540 |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:29 AM |
1) - 2) There is - Shadows. 3) I didn't outright no support, I questioned whether it was really necessary considering two of those options already exist. You can already go first person by zooming in, so I see no need for that option. 4) - 5) - 6) Exactly, because ROBLOX needs to stop making sparkly time this and that. It's ridiculous. 7) - 8) And? ROBLOX isn't going to allow every game to use a varying amount of an update, as it doesn't go with what ROBLOX wants the game to look like. It would also likely become a complete mess by the end of it. People really need to learn to live with it.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2014 05:57 AM |
1)No.People could use that to remove any proof of any wrongdoing 2)They already do that... 3)You could already do that.. 4)No.People could change the group name from a good name to a horrible name which many people in the group don't like 5)No.It's a bit too little. 6)I think there is already one. 7)Sure 8)You can do that right now... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2014 06:02 AM |
All seem correct to me.
Jetpackguy12, bringing legitimate sense to S&I |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 May 2014 10:24 AM |
| ok also this wasn't made for you to all hate on, it was obviously S&I for **ROBLOX** to review, not you :) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 10:30 AM |
these are good ideas.
also the shadows option does **NOT** cast shadows k? k. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DataStore
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8540 |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 11:05 AM |
Eurgh, South.
There are people who would do it, which is the main reason they haven't allowed users to do this. ROBLOX developers have also echoed the same argument that I've displayed, among other arguments, in a lot of the BLOXcasts.
Just because you may not be willing to waste a certain amount of money to embarrass someone, doesn't necessarily mean others wouldn't. You also have to look at it through the eyes of people who steal accounts, and what they would be able to do to remove your groups which you have worked hard on, and so on.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
DataStore
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8540 |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 11:08 AM |
South, as I've already said to you on numerous threads, regarding the suggestion of name changing for groups, just because you may not find one thing insulting doesn't mean that another person won't. I would also like to point out that that was an example, and far more vile changes can be made - which are still within the rules of ROBLOX.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Sereka
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1099 |
|
|
| 22 May 2014 11:15 AM |
6) http://www.roblox.com/Merelys-Sparkle-Time-Hoverboard-item?id=124127383
7) An add on for one month is 30 dollars? You can buy a permanent Xbox/PS or whatever game for that price. Not worth it. Also, mods are not creating a new BC anyway. OBC is enough, we don't need more otherwise we keep asking for more. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2014 12:36 PM |
| If someone changed their group name to embarrass someone else then they would surely be banned anyways :) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 May 2014 12:38 PM |
| Not to mention they could leave the group, and the group would be content-deleted |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 May 2014 01:44 PM |
| Cool story, I obviously didn't care :D |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 May 2014 01:48 PM |
"Cool story, I obviously didn't care :D" >obviously< you do care don't you? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tery215
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 3879 |
|
|
| 25 May 2014 06:49 PM |
#6 is already implemented
See: http://www.roblox.com/Illumina-item?id=16641274 Illumina |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|