meepo44
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 921 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 04:42 PM |
Don't ask me why. I FELT LIKE IT. SO TAKE MY LOGIC AND LIKE IT >:/
This answers three questions about three different logical theorys. And disproves their existence.
Q: Is Time an illusion?
Time is a state. It is relative. Its eternal. Unending. Never beginning. We speak of the beginning of time. That just means things we understand. Time has always been. And always will be. In time movies. You think you can break time? You cannot travel back in time. Because you ARE back in time. And forward. What exists now as much exists then as it exists yesterday.
This goes along hand in hand with the multiple universes logical falsehood.
Multiple universes cannot exist. Because the past has happened in the state it is in. And the future is defined only by the state of the present. If the present is DIFFRENT. Then the future will be so. That's why time travel is impossible. It would have to think that time SAVED everything. Like a really tall building. And you can descend it. But its not. You can no more travel in time then you can Quite differently then you think Travel into the future. You cant travel into the future. You ARE in the future. If you froze your mind asif no time had past. Or gone right past the time in a time vehicle. Disapeared from existence and reappeared. Then. Would you really have MOVED? No. you would just cease to and continue to exist. Things would have moved. YOU would have moved. Out. Not up.
you cant go BACK in time. Just like you cant go FORWARD in time.
Think about it instead of going forward in time. Since then you would think that time flowed.
Of FREEZING time. You can freeze time. Time is always frozen. Everything is always frozen for the second you were there. That's why we can only go forward. not freeze it or backwards.
We exist in time for the ONE SECOND we exist in it. The future is where we are. The past is who we were. The present is when we are.
The deepness.
You have no comprehension >:) Show less
A: Yes.
Q: You cant prove anything exists?
Not being able to prove anything exists contradicts the three basic assumptions of logic.
I am here. I assume I exist because im here. I think therefore I am. I assume other things are here because there here to myself, who i think is here. I assume that i can interact with the things around me. And effect them.
^ Without those three basic assumptions nothing exists.
But. You forget that we would be ASSUMING that nothing exists. Which already proves it wrong.
Therefore.
I can prove. That i exist.
The only way that we could NOT prove other things exist. is if our perception was altered. Notibly. By something that exists. If nothing existed then NOTHING would exist. Point taken that we could just see the universes nothing as something. But then we would be nothing to. And on that assumption.something is nothing. but we don't consider our something to be nothing so that's incorrect
On this reasoning. I prove that I. And other things around me exist.
I don't say the third assumption. because im NOT sure that MY perception of the things i interact with are accurate. Since it can be distorted. But that's really just a note. Since obviously then i could still interact but don't. Though very well could if i was suddenly changed in my perception of my known universe.
All three of the basic logical assumptions proven. As they have many times before. And the theory of solipsism, DISPROVEN.
Not lowered in liklyhood like most things.
A: Wrong. Everything exists.
:Note on previous
I would like to point out. That something = nothing. Is a possibility.
But to make that claim it would have to be absolute. And the first hypothesis would be discredited. And the nothing else is real theory is also discredited. But since we KNOW that WE are real. It cannot be the case. In which case. The second assumption must apply. To state it simply.
We are something to everything. And likewise.
Meaning other people really ARE proof of our and their existence.
Q: Every possible scenario has happened because of multiple universes?
Multiple universe theory is a inaccurate hypothesis. If we exist in a state of infinite possibility. But finite being. We make choices. Do things. Everything happens on a basis of.. well basis. This is the universe that is. The only one that could be. It could only be because its the only one that is. I was always going to write this post. Im writing this post. If I had not written this post then this post would not be. In any other universe the EXACT same thing would happen.
There is no true random. Therefore. There cannot be anything different from that which is.
A: Yes that was easy. Obviously there are not multiple universes.
FINAL QUESTION?
Q: Should I be a logic teacher?
You decide.... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
BloXzon2
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Mar 2014 |
| Total Posts: 2810 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 04:43 PM |
| Just because you google up the answers doesn't exactly mean you're Mr.Child Prodigy... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meepo44
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 921 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 04:52 PM |
I have not gone to google or wiki.
I took this stuff off the top of my head.
:/
Yea TL;DR away.
I don't give a crap. If you want to TL;DR why are you even here. Its a post about logic... If your not REALLY Interested your probably not going to get it anyway.
Do I need to be a prodigy to have a fundamental understanding of logic? No.
But it WAS a lot of fun :D |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:01 PM |
| I feel like he copied and pate |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Impirus
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 286 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:01 PM |
i would like to point out MY logic...
1) the logic stuff in this post appears to make it logical you're a time kiddie.
2) the only logic i could see in this post is you making grammatical mistakes too much for a logic post.
~im an oter (part time c7ger) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meepo44
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 921 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:01 PM |
| That's because your puny mind could not possibly fathom writing it.... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Impirus
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 286 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:03 PM |
@bloxzon
if he googled it up, it wouldnt've had that much of grammatical mistakes... or google wont be pro anymore. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:03 PM |
| that "Show Less" following the first answer is a bit sketchy, no? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Impirus
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Sep 2012 |
| Total Posts: 286 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:04 PM |
meep... dude... stop being a universe kiddie and stuff, i used to think about those but i've abondoned the idea, yay.
~im an oter (part time c7ger) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meepo44
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 921 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:10 PM |
I copyed it off where i first posted it.
Which was on youtube.
I posted it in... 3 separate posts and replyed to the top one with the note that's below it now.
I had to remove some shet from all over the posts. I must have missed that one. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
meepo44
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 921 |
|
|
| 13 May 2014 05:10 PM |
Imp you have no idea what your talking about.
And neither do i O-o???? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|