|
| 12 May 2014 07:12 PM |
who would win :
vaktovia or frost clan |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:14 PM |
flamebait much?
Rainbowdash/Sadmiles4ever |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
XTGNecro
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18514 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:14 PM |
| XTG would win, how could u not know that |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ShadowSTR
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Jul 2010 |
| Total Posts: 24465 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:14 PM |
| Give it a few months and see for yourself (; |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Raethyr
|
  |
| Joined: 08 Mar 2008 |
| Total Posts: 20527 |
|
| |
|
pat9z
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 245 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:15 PM |
they arent good other than at their own base and thats cause it takes time to master their bows
they arent better at fighting then the average clan. there endurance usually wins them raids |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Ratiowise
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10264 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:17 PM |
FC was leading in the first war, but VAK has come a long way since 2011-2012 so yeah.
FC would still win because VAK's still bad with bows xd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:17 PM |
@patz
so your saying if VAK where to raid us right now theyd win?
pshh |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
XTGNecro
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 18514 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:18 PM |
frost clan is very gud they destroy all clan!!!! they are stronk |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pat9z
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 245 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:18 PM |
no frozen im answering the ops question
frost clan isnt good, they are average in activity and skill
vak isnt good either |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:19 PM |
| well as long you insult vak too im fine |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ratiowise
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10264 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:20 PM |
"frost clan isnt good, they are average in activity and skill"
our average member is better than the average vak with stas. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dans59
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8606 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:20 PM |
fc>vak
used to be tgi>vak but now vak>tgi
but ye to answer your question it's fc>vak |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:21 PM |
says the one with fake tra Mp group as primary and while being in tra itself
Rainbowdash/Sadmiles4ever |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pat9z
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 245 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:21 PM |
ratio
fc isnt good at raiding, they cant get it done quickly
it takes hours and that is why fc has good endurance because they can last in raids for a long time
but they arent good enough to win quickly and they rarely loose at fw2 because they have practice with their bows and already mastered them |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pat9z
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 245 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:22 PM |
| zach u can insult me all u want but u cant argue with facts |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ratiowise
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10264 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:23 PM |
"ratio
fc isnt good at raiding, they cant get it done quickly
it takes hours and that is why fc has good endurance because they can last in raids for a long time
but they arent good enough to win quickly and they rarely loose at fw2 because they have practice with their bows and already mastered them"
considering you're in tra, i find it very hypocritical of you to say that WE'RE bad at raiding.
plus, we're currently leading the fc-vak war which has been postponed TWICE by vaktus. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
are31
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 13767 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:26 PM |
at least fc has a fair base
ᴬᴿᴱᴲᴵ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pat9z
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 245 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:26 PM |
go ahead and attack the clan im in instead of defending your own
tra is average in skill too tra is more active than fc tra has endurance like fc
idc what you are winning because my point still stands, my point is still true
if you cant get things done quickly in a raid and it takes you hours to win, you arent as good as you are hyped up to be, u just have good endurance and outlasted the enemies |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:29 PM |
ahem
fc is strong and good at raiding. we don't flood too often, so that's why we take awhile to win. it's hard to win when ur outnumbered while raiding.
besides, we don't expend all of our resources on little raids on weak clans.
-Hunterspeedy |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ratiowise
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10264 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:31 PM |
"go ahead and attack the clan im in instead of defending your own
tra is average in skill too tra is more active than fc tra has endurance like fc
idc what you are winning because my point still stands, my point is still true
if you cant get things done quickly in a raid and it takes you hours to win, you arent as good as you are hyped up to be, u just have good endurance and outlasted the enemies"
tra, like usm and ussf, is full of military tryhards that devote their life to roblox. it's kinda the only thing that makes tra active.
tra is decent and all, but if you're gonna call fc "average" in skill, it would be more realistic to call tra below average.
tra does not have endurance, my god. in the very quick el-tra war, you guys rqed from a raid in about 15. WAYYYYYY better than rat but not comparable to fc xd |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pat9z
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 245 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:31 PM |
wow finally someone from fc is defending their clan
if fc was so strong they wouldnt need to rely on numbers to win raids. i saw fc raids last hours on jc
if you dont flood often thats because u dont have good activity
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ratiowise
|
  |
| Joined: 18 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 10264 |
|
|
| 12 May 2014 07:33 PM |
fc does not simply flood.
we try our best to make the server even so we can easily farm kos and we quickly flash raid when we're serious. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|