|
| 22 Apr 2014 10:11 PM |
Player points should be just that--Player points. They should be just for players, to show off how much time they spend doing what and they can rank themselves in whatever way they want based off of that. I really don't care.
This would be different:Clan points.
Clan points would be based off of a new "automated" war system, which would be divided into several parts.
First off, the 100 member limit for clans? Shuck that out like corn. Instead, have a roster. Infinite in size, of course, invite only still(if the leader chooses so), but make a party roster. This "raiding party" would be the ones eligible to earn points. Everybody else is able to be switched into the raiding party, but they are normally just substitutes.
Points could be earned in the following situations:
1. Matchup raids
Not at war, want some practice and some points? You can gather your raiding party, and be put into a matchup that looks at the following factors: -->Number of people(Equal numbers) -->Ranking on leaderboard -->Wins/Losses -->Genre You have one raid or defense against this group. The winner gets a clan point.
2. Open war
A war where each raid is worth one clan point as long as at least 3 clan members from both groups are in it. The winner of the war is the one who wins the most clan points FROM THAT WAR, and that war winner gets a selected stipend out of the enemy group's clan points. So if VAK beat RAT(or vice versa), and VAK had 100 clan points, and RAT had 99, VAK would get an extra 10 for winning, and RAT would be left with 89, while VAK gets 110. Allies would be allowed in this war, and the forts would be open to other groups raiding at any time as well.
3. Closed war
Just like an open war point wise, but instead, no allies, and other groups are barred from both forts. The groups would also have the choice to limit it just to the clans.
Clan points would cumulate and be ranked on the leaderboard based on group size, wins, and losses.
So, Superclan division(30k+ members), Interclan division(1k-29.9k members), and powerclan division(1-999 members).
Each would be ranked by the number of points. This would allow smaller clans to still reap the benefits from winning clan points, because they are kept seperate from the superclans.
meh, 4th red bull. I don't even care. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2014 10:18 PM |
Already posted in S&G a bit ago
http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=131632271
Support it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2014 10:19 PM |
S&I* my bad.
Support: http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=131632271 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2014 10:22 PM |
I support yours, forgot to mention in first one, my bad. I honestly hope this gets implemented, because if any form of Leaderboards have to stay, this would at least make it clan-based. I think we have slightly different ideas, but as long as they're automated on the group page, open (not 100 member cap) and separated from PPs, then I'm content.
http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=131632271 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Apr 2014 10:22 PM |
I SWEAR I ALWAYS TYPE IN S&G TOO
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
BLEXCOT
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1902 |
|
|
| 22 Apr 2014 10:23 PM |
| whyyyy are yall making allll these damnnnn suggestionnns i would ignore all of them if i was a mod too -__0 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Apr 2014 08:15 AM |
Support. But if you don't email roblox admins, they wont care, because thats how it works.
Vendetta created a petition with over 70 pages, and what admins did? Nothing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|